Late complications of circumcision in Iran

  • Rooh-Allah YeganeEmail author
  • Abdol-Reza Kheirollahi
  • Nour-Allah Salehi
  • Mohammad Bashashati
  • Jamal-Aldin Khoshdel
  • Mina Ahmadi
Original Article


Today, circumcision is the most commonly performed surgical procedure worldwide. Early and late complications may occur due to circumcision. To find the prevalence of late complications of circumcision, we studied 3,205 elementary-school boys aged 6–12 years in 2002. All of them were Iranian and Muslim. Nearly 3,125 of the boys have been circumcised. Most of the boys (2,214 boys) had been circumcised after 2 years of age. Moreover, most of them were operated by traditional circumcisers (43.49%). Late complications (7.39%) were reported in 231 boys. Excessive residual foreskin was seen in 113 children (3.6%). Excessive removal of skin was detected in 42 boys (1.3%), meatal stenosis in 29 boys (0.9%), granoloma in 22 boys (0.7%), penile rotation in 17 boys (0.5%), and 8 boys had secondary chordee (0.2%). The complication rate was not different between the neonatal circumcision and older groups. We suggested that circumcision should only be performed in medical institutions by suitably trained specialists.


Circumcision Complication Male Iran 



We thank pupils and parents, teachers, and chiefs of elementary schools of Khorram-Abad city for their cooperation.


  1. 1.
    Williams N, Kapila L (1993) Complications of circumcision. Br J Surg 80:1231–1236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moses S, Bailey RC, Ronald AR (1998) Male circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risks. Sex Transm Infect 74:368–373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Warner E, Strashin E (1981). Benefits and risks of circumcision. Can Med Assoc J 125:967–976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ozdemir E (1997) Significantly increased complication risks with mass circumcisions. Br J Urol 80:136–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Demirseren ME, Gokrem S (2004) Circumcision in unqualified hands: a significant risk of complication. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1090–1092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ben Chaim J, Livne PM, Binyamini J, Hardak B, Ben Meir D, Mor Y (2005) Complications of circumcision in Israel: a one year multicenter survey. Isr Med Assoc J 7:368–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahmed A, Mbibi NH, Dawam D, Kalayi GD (1999) Complications of traditional male circumcision. Ann Trop Paediatr 19:113–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sahin F, Beyazova U, Akturk A (2003) Attitudes and practices regarding circumcision in Turkey. Child Care Health Dev 29:275–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Akoz T, Erdogan B, Gorgu M, Aslan G, Altintas H (1998) Unusual complications of circumcision. Plast Reconstr Surg 101: 1915–1918PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leitch IO (1970) Circumcision. A continuing enigma. Aust Paediatr J 6:59–65Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brisson PA, Patel HI, Feins NR (2002) Revision of circumcision in children: report of 56 cases. J Pediatr Surg 37:1343–1346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Redman JF (1995) Circumcision revision in prepubertal boys: analysis of a 2-year experience and description of a technique. J Urol 153:180–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaplan GW(1983) Complications of circumcision. Urol Clin North Am 10:543–549PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smey P (1985) Re: Penile denudation injuries after circumcision. J Urol 134:1220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van Duyn J, War WS (1962) Excessive penile skin loss from circumcision. J Med Assoc Ga 51:394–396Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Upadhyay V, Hammodat HM, Pease PW (1998) Post circumcision meatal stenosis: 12 years’ experience. N Z Med J 111:57–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Persad R, Sharma S, McTavish J, Imber C, Mouriquand PD (1995) Clinical presentation and pathophysiology of meatal stenosis following circumcision. Br J Urol 75:91–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raynor SC (2000) Circumcisions. In: Ashcraft K, Murphy JP (eds) Pediatric surgery, 3rd edn. W.B. Saunders , Philadelphia pp 783–786Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Atikeler MK, Onur R, Gecit I, Senol FA, Cobanoglu B (2001) Increased morbidity after circumcision from a hidden complication. BJU Int 88:938–940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Campbell M, Walsh PC (1998) Campbell`s urology, 7th edn. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, p 1633Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rooh-Allah Yegane
    • 1
    Email author
  • Abdol-Reza Kheirollahi
    • 2
  • Nour-Allah Salehi
    • 3
  • Mohammad Bashashati
    • 4
  • Jamal-Aldin Khoshdel
    • 5
  • Mina Ahmadi
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Loqman-Hakim HospitalShahid Beheshti Medical UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Urology, Shohadaye Ashayer HospitalLorestan University of Medical SciencesKhorram AbadIran
  3. 3.Department of Surgery, Loqman-Hakim HospitalShahid Beheshti Medical UniversityTehranIran
  4. 4.Researcher of Surgery, Loqman-Hakim HospitalShahid Beheshti Medical UniversityTehranIran
  5. 5.Lorestan University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations