Evolution of Mediterranean Sea water properties under climate change scenarios in the Med-CORDEX ensemble

  • Javier Soto-NavarroEmail author
  • G. Jordá
  • A. Amores
  • W. Cabos
  • S. Somot
  • F. Sevault
  • D. Macías
  • V. Djurdjevic
  • G. Sannino
  • L. Li
  • D. Sein


Twenty-first century projections for the Mediterranean water properties have been analyzed using the largest ensemble of regional climate models (RCMs) available up to now, the Med-CORDEX ensemble. It is comprised by 25 simulations, 10 historical and 15 scenario projections, from which 11 are ocean–atmosphere coupled runs and 4 are ocean forced simulations. Three different emissions scenarios are considered: RCP8.5, RCP4.5 and RCP2.6. All the simulations agree in projecting a warming across the entire Mediterranean basin by the end of the century as a result of the decrease of heat losses to the atmosphere through the sea surface and an increase in the net heat input through the Strait of Gibraltar. The warming will affect the whole water column with higher anomalies in the upper layer. The temperature change projected by the end of the century ranges between 0.81 and 3.71 °C in the upper layer (0–150 m), between 0.82 and 2.97 °C in the intermediate layer (150–600 m) and between 0.15 and 0.18 °C in the deep layer (600 m—bottom). The intensity of the warming is strongly dependent on the choice of emission scenario and, in second order, on the choice of Global Circulation Model (GCM) used to force the RCM. On the other hand, the local structures reproduced by each simulation are mainly determined by the regional model and not by the scenario or the global model. The salinity also increases in all the simulation due to the increase of the freshwater deficit (i.e. the excess of evaporation over precipitation and river runoff) and the related increase in the net salt transport at the Gibraltar Strait. However, in the upper layer this process can be damped or enhanced depending upon the characteristics of the inflowing waters from the Atlantic. This, in turn, depends on the evolution of salinity in the Northeast Atlantic projected by the GCM. Thus a clear zonal gradient is found in most simulations with large positive salinity anomalies in the eastern basin and a freshening of the upper layer of the western basin in most simulations. The salinity changes projected for the whole basin range between 0 and 0.34 psu in the upper layer, between 0.08 and 0.37 psu in the intermediate layer and between − 0.05 and 0.33 in the deep layer. These changes in the temperature and salinity modify in turn the characteristics of the main water masses as the new waters become saltier, warmer and less dense along the twenty-first century. There is a model consensus that the intensity of the deep water formation in the Gulf of Lions is expected to decrease in the future. The rate of decrease remains however very uncertain depending on the scenario and model chosen. At the contrary, there is no model consensus concerning the change in the intensity of the deep water formation in the Adriatic Sea and in the Aegean Sea, although most models also point to a reduction.



This work has been carried out in the frame of the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades funded CLIFISH Project (CTM2015-66400-C3-2-R). Additional support received from the EU project SOCLIMPACT (This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 776661). This work is part of the Med-CORDEX initiative ( and HyMeX program ( DS also acknowledges the state assignment of FASO Russia (theme 0149‐2019‐0015).


This study was funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades funded CLIFISH Project (CTM2015-66400-C3-2-R).

Supplementary material

382_2019_5105_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (7.1 mb)
Supplementary file1 (PDF 7287 kb)


  1. Adloff F, Somot S, Sevault F et al (2015) Mediterranean Sea response to climate change in an ensemble of twenty first century scenarios. Clim Dyn 45:2775–2802. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amores A, Rueda L, Montserrat S et al (2014) Influence of the hydrodynamic conditions on the accessibility of Aristeus antennatus and other demersal species to the deep water trawl fishery off the Balearic Islands (western Mediterranean). J Mar Sys 138:203–210. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Artale V, Calmanti S, Carillo A et al (2010) An atmosphere–ocean regional climate modelfor the Mediterranean area: assessment of a presentclimate simulation. Clim Dyn 35:721–740. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Artale V, Falcini F, Marullo S et al (2018) Linking mixing processes and climate variability to the heat content distribution of the Eastern Mediterranean abyss. Nat Sci Rep 8(1):11317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bethoux JP, Gentili B (1999) Functioning of the Mediterranean sea: past and present changes related to freshwater input and climate changes. J Mar Syst 20:33–47. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bethoux JP, Gentili B, Morin P et al (1999) The Mediterranean Sea: a miniature ocean for climatic and environmental studies and a key for the climatic functioning of the North Atlantic. Prog Oceanogr 44:131–146. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beuvier J, Béranger K, Brossier CL et al (2012) Spreading of the Western Mediterranean deep water after winter 2005: time scales and deep cyclone transport. J Geophys Res Ocean. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beuvier J, Sevault F, Herrmann M et al (2010) Modeling the Mediterranean Sea interannual variability during 1961–2000: focus on the Eastern Mediterranean Transient. J Geophys Res Ocean. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darmaraki S, Somot S, Sevault F et al (2019) Future evolution of marine heatwaves in the Mediterranean Sea. Clim Dyn. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Lavergne C, Madec G, Le Sommer J et al (2016) On the consumption of Antarctic bottom water in the abyssal ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 46:635–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demirov E, Pinardi N (2002) Simulation of the Mediterranean Sea circulation from\r1979 to 1993: Part I. The interannual variability. J Mar Syst 33–34:23–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Djurdjevic V, Rajkovic B (2010) Development of the EBU-POM coupled regional climate model and results from climate change experiments. In: Mihajlovic TD, Lalic B (eds) Advances in environmental modeling and measurements. Nova Publishers, Hauppauge, pp 23–32, ISBN: 978-1-60876-599-7Google Scholar
  13. Dubois C, Somot S, Calmanti S et al (2012) Future projections of the surface heat and water budgets of the Mediterranean Sea in an ensemble of coupled atmosphere-ocean regional climate models. Clim Dyn 39:1859–1884. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Escudier R, Renault L, Pascual A et al (2016) Eddy properties in the Western Mediterranean Sea from satellite altimetry and a numerical simulation. J Geophys Res Ocean 121:3990–4006. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernández V, Dietrich DE, Haney RL, Tintoré J (2005) Mesoscale, seasonal and interannual variability in the Mediterranean Sea using a numerical ocean model. Prog Oceanogr 66:321–340. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferrari R, Mashayek A, McDougall TJ et al (2016) Turning ocean mixing upside down. J Phys Oceanogr 46(7):2239–2261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giorgi F (2006) Climate change hot-spots. Geophys Res Lett 33:1–4. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giorgi F, Lionello P (2008) Climate change projections for the Msediterranean region. Glob Planet Change 63:90–104. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gomis D, Alvarez-Fanjul E, Jordà G, et al. (2016) Regional marine climate scenarios in the NE Atlantic sector close to the Spanish shores. Sci Mar 80:215–234. DOI: 10.3989/scimar.04328.07A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gualdi S, Somot S, Li L et al (2013) THE circe simulations: resgional climate change projections with realistic representation of the mediterranean sea. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:65–81. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamon M, Beuvier J, Somot S et al (2016) Design and validation of MEDRYS, a Mediterranean Sea reanalysis over the period 1992–2013. Ocean Sci 12:577–599. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harzallah A, Jordà G, Dubois C et al (2018) Long term evolution of heat budget in the Mediterranean Sea from Med-CORDEX forced and coupled simulations. Clim Dyn 51:1145–1165. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Herrmann MJ, Somot S (2008) Relevance of ERA40 dynamical downscaling for modeling deep convection in the Mediterranean Sea. Geophys Res Lett 35:1–5. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V and Midgley PM (eds)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp 1535Google Scholar
  25. IPCC (2018) Global Warming of 1.5 °C.An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte V,Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds)] (in press)Google Scholar
  26. Jordà G, Marbà N, Duarte CM (2012) Climate warming and Mediterranean seagrass. Nat Clim Change 3:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jordà G, Von Schuckmann K, Josey SA et al (2017) The Mediterranean Sea heat and mass budgets: estimates, uncertainties and perspectives. Prog Oceanogr 156:174–208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li L, Casado A, Congedi L et al (2012) 7—Modeling of the Mediterranean climate system. In: Lionello P (ed) The climate of the Mediterranean Region. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 419–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Llasses J, Jordà G, Gomis D et al (2018) Heat and salt redistribution within the Mediterranean Sea in the Med-CORDEX model ensemble. Clim Dyn 51:1119–1143. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. L’Hévéder B, Li L, Sevault F, Somot S (2013) Interannual variabilityof deep convection in the Northwestern Mediterranean simulated with a coupled AORCM. Clim Dyn 41(3–4):937–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Macias D, Garcia-Gorriz E, Stips A (2013) Understanding the causes of recent warming of mediterranean waters. How much could be attributed to climate change? PLoS One. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Macias DM, Garcia-Gorriz E, Stips A (2015) Productivity changes in the Mediterranean Sea for the twenty-first century in response to changes in the regional atmospheric forcing. Front Mar Sci 2:1–13. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Macias D, Stips A, Garcia-Gorriz E, Dosio A (2018) Hydrological and biogeochemical response of the Mediterranean Sea to freshwater flow changes for the end of the 21stcentury. PLoS One 13:1–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malanotte-Rizzoli P, Artale V, Borzelli-Eusebi GL et al (2014) Physical forcing and physical/biochemical variability of the Mediterranean Sea: a review of unresolved issues and directions for future research. Ocean Sci 10:281–322. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marbà N, Jordà G, Agustí S, Duarte CM (2016) Evidences of impacts of climate change on Mediterranean Biota. Front Mar Sci 3:1–3. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mariotti A, Struglia MV, Zeng N, Lau KM (2002) The hydrological cycle in the Mediterranean region and implications for the water budget of the Mediterranean sea. J Clim 15:1674–1690.;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mariotti A, Zeng N, Yoon JH et al (2008) Mediterranean water cycle changes: Transition to drier 21st century conditions in observations and CMIP3 simulations. Environ Res Lett. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marshall J, Schott F (1999) Open-ocean convection: observations, theory, and models. Rev Geophys 37:1–64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Massutí E, Monserrat S, Oliver P et al (2008) The influence of oceanographic scenarios on the population dynamics of demersal resources in the western Mediterranean: hypothesis for hake and red shrimp off Balearic Islands. J Mar Syst 71:421–438. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meinshausen M, Smith SJ, Calvin K et al (2011) The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim Change 109:213. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Millot C (2014) Levantine Intermediate Water characteristics: an astounding general misunderstanding! (addendum). Sci Mar 78:165–171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Monserrat S, López-Jurado JL, Marcos M (2008) A mesoscale index to describe the regional circulation around the Balearic Islands. J Mar Syst 71:413–420. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nabat P, Somot S, Mallet M et al (2014) Contribution of anthropogenic sulfate aerosols to the changing Euro-Mediterranean climate since 1980. Geophys Res Lett. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oddo P, Adani M, Pinardi N et al (2009) A nested Atlantic-Mediterranean Sea general circulation model for operational forecasting. Ocean Sci 5:461–473. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pinardi N, Masetti E (2000) Variability of the large scale general circulation of the Mediterranean Sea from observations and modelling: a review. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 158:153–174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robinson AR, Golnaraghi M, Leslie WG et al (1991) The eastern Mediterranean general circulation: features, structure and variability. Dyn Atmos Ocean 15:215–240. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roether W, Manca BB, Klein B et al (1996) Recent changes in Eastern Mediterranean deep waters. Science (80-) 271:333–335. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roether W, Schlitzer R (1991) Eastern Mediterranean deep water renewal on the basis of chlorofluoromethane and tritium data. Dyn Atmos Ocean 15:333–354. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ruti PM, Somot S, Giorgi F et al (2015) Med-CORDEX initiative for Mediterranean climate studies. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 97:1187–1208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sanchez-Gomez E, Somot S, Mariotti A (2009) Future changes in the Mediterranean water budget projected by an ensemble of regional climate models. Geophys Res Lett 36:1–5. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sannino G, Carillo A, Pisacane G, Naranjo C (2015) On the relevance of tidal forcing in modelling the Mediterranean thermohaline circulation. Prog Oceanogr 134:304–329. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sannino G, Herrmann M, Carillo A et al (2009) An eddy-permitting model of the Mediterranean Sea with a two-way grid refinement at the Strait of Gibraltar. Ocean Model 30:56–72. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sein DV, Mikolajewicz U, Gröger M et al (2015) Regionally coupled atmosphere-ocean-sea ice-marine biogeochemistry model ROM: 1. Description and validation. J Adv Model Earth Syst 7(1):268–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sevault F, Somot S, Alias A et al (2014) A fully coupled Mediterranean regional climate system model: design and evaluation of the ocean component for the 1980–2012 period. Tellus A Dyn Meteorol Oceanogr 66(1):23967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simoncelli S, Fratianni C, Pinardi N, et al. (2014) Mediterranean Sea physical reanalysis (MEDREA 1987–2015) (Version 1). EU Copernicus Mar Serv Inf. 10.25423/medsea_reanalysis_phys_006_004.Google Scholar
  56. Skliris N, Lascaratos A (2004) Impacts of the Nile River damming on the thermohaline circulation and water mass characteristics of the Mediterranean Sea. J Mar Syst 52:121–143. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Somot S, Houpert L, Sevault F et al (2018a) Characterizing, modelling and understanding the climate variability of the deep water formation in the North-Western Mediterranean Sea. Clim Dyn 51:1179–1210. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Somot S, Ruti P, Ahrens B et al (2018b) Editorial for the Med-CORDEX special issue. Clim Dyn 51:771–777. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Somot S, Sevault F, Déqué M (2006) Transient climate change scenario simulation of the Mediterranean Sea for the twenty-first century using a high-resolution ocean circulation model. Clim Dyn 27:851–879. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Somot S, Sevault F, Déqué M, Crépon M (2008) 21st century climate change scenario for the Mediterranean using a coupled atmosphere-ocean regional climate model. Glob Planet Change 63:112–126. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Soto-Navarro J, Criado-Aldeanueva F, García-Lafuente J, Sánchez-Romn A (2010) Estimation of the Atlantic inflow through the Strait of Gibraltar from climatological and in situ data. J Geophys Res Ocean. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Soto-Navarro J, Somot S, Sevault F et al (2015) Evaluation of regional ocean circulation models for the Mediterranean Sea at the Strait of Gibraltar: volume transport and thermohaline properties of the outflow. Clim Dyn 44:1277–1292. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thorpe RB, Bigg GR (2000) Modelling the sensitivity of Mediterranean outflow to anthropogenically forced climate change. Clim Dyn 16:355–368. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Waldman R, Brüggemann N, Bosse A et al (2018) Overturning the Mediterranean thermohaline circulation. Geophys Res Lett 45:8407–8415. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Waldman R, Herrmann M, Somot S et al (2017) Impact of the mesoscale dynamics on ocean deep convection: the 2012–2013 case study in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. J Geophys Res Ocean 122:8813–8840. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zavatarelli M, Mellor GL (1995) A numerical study of the Mediterranean Sea circulation. J Phys Oceanogr 25:1384–1414.;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Javier Soto-Navarro
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. Jordá
    • 2
  • A. Amores
    • 1
  • W. Cabos
    • 3
  • S. Somot
    • 4
  • F. Sevault
    • 4
  • D. Macías
    • 5
  • V. Djurdjevic
    • 6
  • G. Sannino
    • 7
  • L. Li
    • 8
  • D. Sein
    • 9
    • 10
  1. 1.Mediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies (IMEDEA, UIB-CSIC)MallorcaSpain
  2. 2.Spanish Institute of Oceanography (IEO)MallorcaSpain
  3. 3.University of Alcalá de HenaresAlcalá de HenaresSpain
  4. 4.Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques (CNRM)Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRSToulouseFrance
  5. 5.European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC)IspraItaly
  6. 6.Faculty of PhysicsUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  7. 7.ENEARomaItaly
  8. 8.Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (LMD)CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Ecole PolytechniqueParisFrance
  9. 9.Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine ResearchBremerhavenGermany
  10. 10.Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of ScienceMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations