Improving the CPC’s ENSO Forecasts using Bayesian model averaging
Statistical and dynamical model simulations have been commonly used separately in El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) prediction. Current models are imperfect representations of ENSO and each of them has strength and weakness for capturing different aspects in ENSO prediction. Thus, it is important to utilize the results from a variety of different models. The Bayesian model averaging (BMA) is an effective tool not only in describing uncertainties associated with each model simulation but also providing the forecast performance of different models. The BMA method was developed to combine the NCEP/CPC three statistical and one dynamical model forecasts of seasonal Ocean Niño Index (ONI) from 1982 to 2010. The BMA weights were derived directly from the predictive performance of the combined models. The highly efficient expectation–maximization (EM) algorithm was used to achieve numerical solutions. We show that the BMA method can be used to assess the performance of the individual models and assign greater weights to better performing models. The continuous ranked probability score is applied to evaluate the BMA probability forecasts. As an elaboration of the reliability diagram, the attributes diagram is used that includes the calibration function, refinement distribution, and reference lines. The combination of statistical and dynamical models is found to provide a more skillful prediction of ENSO than only using a suite of statistical models, a single bias-corrected dynamical model, or the equally weighted average forecasts from all four models. Probability forecasts of El Niño events based only on winter ONI values are reliable and exhibit sharpness. In contrast, an under-forecasting bias and less reliable forecasts are noted for La Niña.
This study was funded by the Hawaii State Climate Office through SOEST at the University of Hawaii at Manoa and the Climate Prediction Center of NCEP. We thank May Izumi for her editing service.
- Faust J, Wright JH (2013) Forecasting inflation. In Handbook of economic forecasting (Vol. 2, pp. 2–56). ElsevierGoogle Scholar
- Glantz MH (2001) Currents of change: impacts of El Niño and La Niña on climate and society. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- McAvaney BJ, Coauthors (2001) Model evaluation. climate change 2001: the scientific basis. In: Houghton JT (ed) Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 471–523Google Scholar
- Rings J, Vrugt JA, Schoups G, Huisman JA, Vereecken H (2012) Bayesian model averaging using particle filtering and Gaussian mixture modeling: theory, concepts, and simulation experiments. Water Resour Res 48(5)Google Scholar
- Sarachik ES, Cane MA (2010) The El Niño-Southern oscillation phenomenon. Cambridge Univ. Press, p 384Google Scholar
- Schepen A, Wang QJ, Robertson DE (2014) Combining the strengths of statistical and dynamical modeling approaches for forecasting Australian seasonal rainfall. J Geophys Res (Atmospheres), 117(D20)Google Scholar
- Trenberth KE (1998) Development and forecasts of the 1997/98 El Niño: CLIVAR scientific issues. CLIVAR Exchanges 3:4–14Google Scholar
- Wilks DS (2011) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. Academic Press, 676 pp 334–340Google Scholar