Climate Dynamics

, Volume 53, Issue 5–6, pp 2931–2947 | Cite as

The role of air-sea coupling in the downscaled hydroclimate projection over Peninsular Florida and the West Florida Shelf

  • Amit BhardwajEmail author
  • Vasubandhu Misra


A comparative analysis of two sets of downscaled simulations of the current climate and the future climate projections over Peninsular Florida (PF) and the West Florida Shelf (WFS) is presented to isolate the role of high-resolution air-sea coupling. In addition, the downscaled integrations are also compared with the much coarser, driving global model projection to examine the impact of grid resolution of the models. The WFS region is habitat for significant marine resources, which has both commercial and recreational value. Additionally, the hydroclimatic features of the WFS and PF contrast each other. For example, the seasonal cycle of surface evaporation in these two regions are opposite in phase to one another. In this study, we downscale the Community Climate System Model version 4 (CCSM4) simulations of the late twentieth century and the mid-twenty-first century (with reference concentration pathway 8.5 emission scenario) using an atmosphere only Regional Spectral Model (RSM) at 10 km grid resolution. In another set, we downscale the same set of CCSM4 simulations using the coupled RSM-Regional Ocean Model System (RSMROMS) at 10 km grid resolution. The comparison of the twentieth century simulations suggest significant changes to the SST simulation over WFS from RSMROMS relative to CCSM4, with the former reducing the systematic errors of the seasonal mean SST over all seasons except in the boreal summer season. It may be noted that owing to the coarse resolution of CCSM4, the comparatively shallow bathymetry of the WFS and the sharp coastline along PF is poorly defined, which is significantly rectified at 10 km grid spacing in RSMROMS. The seasonal hydroclimate over PF and the WFS in the twentieth century simulation show significant bias in all three models with CCSM4 showing the least for a majority of the seasons, except in the wet June-July-August (JJA) season. In the JJA season, the errors of the surface hydroclimate over PF is the least in RSMROMS. The systematic errors of surface precipitation and evaporation are more comparable between the simulations of CCSM4 and RSMROMS, while they differ the most in moisture flux convergence. However, there is considerable improvement in RSMROMS compared to RSM simulations in terms of the seasonal bias of the hydroclimate over WFS and PF in all seasons of the year. This suggests the potential rectification impact of air-sea coupling on dynamic downscaling of CCSM4 twentieth century simulations. In terms of the climate projection in the decades of 2041–2060, the RSMROMS simulation indicate significant drying of the wet season over PF compared to moderate drying in CCSM4 and insignificant changes in the RSM projection. This contrasting projection is also associated with projected warming of SSTs along the WFS in RSMROMS as opposed to warming patterns of SST that is more zonal and across the WFS in CCSM4.



This work was supported by NOAA grant NA12OAR4310078 and the South Florida Water Management District (PO 039231). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


  1. Adler RF, Huffman GJ, Bolvin DT, Curtis S, Nelkin EJ (2000) Tropical rainfall distributions determined using TRMM combined with other satellite and rain gauge information. J Appl Meteorol 39(12):2007–2023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alpert J, Kanamitsu M, Caplan P, Sela J, White G (1988) Mountain induced gravity wave drag parameterization in the NMC medium-range forecast model. In Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, 8th, Baltimore, MD. 726–733Google Scholar
  3. Boyer TP, Stephens C, Antonov JI, Conkright ME, Locarnini LA, O’Brien TD, Garcia HE (2002) Salinity. NOAA Atlas NESDIS 49 2:165 pp World Ocean Atlas 2001Google Scholar
  4. Carlson E (2012) Population trends in Florida, 2000 to 2030. In Climate Scenarios: A Florida-Centric View, ed. V. Misra, Available from:
  5. Carton JA, Giese BS (2008) A reanalysis of ocean climate using Simple Ocean Data Assimilation (SODA). Mon Weather Rev 136(8):2999–3017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan S, Misra V (2011) Dynamic downscaling of the North American with the ECPC-NCEP Regional Spectral Model from NCEP CFS global model-varied representation. J Climate 24:653–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang YL, Oey LY (2010) Why can wind delay the shedding of Loop Current eddies? J Phys Oceanogr 40(11):2481–2495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chou MD, Lee KT (1996) Parameterizations for the absorption of solar radiation by water vapor and ozone. J Atmos Sci 53:1203–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chou MD, Lee KT, Tsay SC, Fu Q (1999) Parameterization for cloud longwave scattering for use in atmospheric models. J Clim 12(1):159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dixon LK, Kirkpatrick GJ, Hall ER, Nissanka A (2014) Nitrogen, Phosphorous, and Silica on the west Florida shelf: patterns and relationships with Karenia spp. Occurrence Harmful Algae 38:8–19. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ek MB, Mitchell KE, Lin Y, Rogers E, Grunmann P, Koren V, Gayno G, Tarpley JD (2003) Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model. J Geophys Res 108:22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feser F, Burkhardt R, von Storch H, Winterfeldt J, Zahn M (2011) Regional climate models add value to global model data. Bull Am Soc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gent PR, Danabasoglu G, Donner LJ, Holland MM, Hunke EC, Jayne SR, Lawrence DM, Neale RB, Rasch PJ, Vertenstein M, Worley PH (2011) The community climate system model version 4. J Clim 24(19):4973–4991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giorgi F, Gutowski WJ Jr (2015) Regional dynamical downscaling and the CORDEX initiative. Annu Rev Environ Resour 40:467–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haidvogel DB, Arango HG, Hedstrom K, Beckmann A, Malanotte-Rizzoli P, Shchepetkin AF (2000) Model evaluation experiments in the North Atlantic Basin: simulations in nonlinear terrain-following coordinates. Dynam Atmos Oceans 32(3):239–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. He R, Weisberg RH, Zhang H, Muller-Karger FE, Helber RW (2003) A cloud free, satellite derived, sea surface temperature analysis for the West Florida Shelf. Geophys Res Lett. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heil CA, Bronk DA, Dixon LK, Hitchcock L et al (2014) The Gulf of Mexico (ECOHAB): Karenia program 2006–2012. Harmful Algae 38:3–7. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hewitson BC, Crane RG (1996) Climate downscaling: techniques and application. Clim Res 5:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hong SY, Pan HL (1996) Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model. Mon Weather Rev 124(10):2322–2339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huffman GJ, Adler RF, Rudolf B, Schneider U, Keehn PR (1995) Global precipitation estimates based on a technique for combining satellite-based estimates, rain gauge analysis, and NWP model precipitation information. J Clim 8(5):1284–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huffman GJ, Adler RF, Arkin P, Chang A, Ferraro R, Gruber A, Janowiak J, McNab A, Rudolf B, Schneider U (1997) The global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) combined precipitation dataset. Bull Am Meteor Soc 78(1):5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Juang HM, Kanamitsu M (1994) The NMC nested regional spectral model. Mon Weather Rev 122:3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanamitsu M, Yoshimura K, Yhang YB, Hong SY (2010) Errors of interannual variability and trend in dynamical downscaling of reanalysis. J Geophys Res 115:17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirtman B, Bitz C, Bryan F et al (2012) Impact of ocean model resolution on CCSM climate simulations. Clim Dyn 39:1303–1328. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kirtman BP, Perlin N, Siqueira L (2017) Ocean eddies and climate predictability. Chaos Interdiscip J Nonlinear Sci 27:126902. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Large WG, McWilliams JC, Doney SC (1994) Oceanic vertical mixing: a review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization. Rev Geophys 32(4):363–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laurindo LC, Siqueira L, Mariano AJ, Kirtman BP (2018) Cross-spectral analysis of the SST/10-m wind speed coupling resolved by satellite products and climate model simulations. Clim Dyn SubmittGoogle Scholar
  28. Li H, Kanamitsu M, Hong SY (2012) California reanalysis downscaling at 10 km using an ocean -atmosphere coupled regional model system. J Geophys Res 117:12Google Scholar
  29. Liu Y, Weisberg RH (2012) Seasonal variability on the West Florida Shelf. Prog Oceanogr 104:80–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu Y, Lee SK, Muhling BA, Lamkin JT, Enfield DB (2012) Significant reduction of the loop current in the 21st century and its impact on the Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res 117:C05039. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu H, Wang C, Lee SK, Enfield DB (2013) Atlantic warm pool variability in the CMIP5 simulations. J Clim 26:5315–5336. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu Y, Lee SK, Enfield DB, Muhling BA, Lamkin JT, Muller-Karger FE, Roffer MA (2015) Potential impact of climate change on the intra-Americas Sea: part-1. A dynamic downscaling of the CMIP5 model projections. J Mar Syst 148:56–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mellor GL, Yamada T (1982) Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev Geophys 20(4):851–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Misra V (2005) Simulation of the intraseasonal variance of the South American summer monsoon. Mon Weather Rev 133(3):663–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Misra V, Dirmeyer PA (2009) Air, sea, and land interactions of the continental US hydroclimate. J Hydrometeorol 10(2):353–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Misra V, Kanamitsu M (2004) Anomaly Nesting: a methodology to dowscale seasonal climate climate simulations from an AGCM. J Clim 17:3249–3262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Misra V, Mishra A (2016) The oceanic influence on the rainy season of Peninsular Florida. J Geophys Res 121(13):7691–7709Google Scholar
  38. Misra V, DiNapoli S, Bastola S (2013) Dynamic downscaling of the 20th century reanalysis over the southeastern United States. Reg Env Change 13:15–23. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Misra V, Mishra A, Li H (2016) The sensitivity of the regional coupled ocean-atmosphere simulations over the Intra-Americas seas to the prescribed bathymetry. Dynam Atmos Oceans 76:29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Misra V, Mishra A, Bhardwaj A (2017) High -resolution regional -coupled ocean–atmosphere simulation of the Indian Summer Monsoon. Int J Climatol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Misra V, Mishra A, Bhardwaj A, Viswanathan K, Schmutz D (2018) The potential role of land cover on secular changes of the hydroclimate of Peninsular Florida. NPJ Clim Atmos Sci. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moorthi S, Suarez MJ (1992) Relaxed Arakawa-Schubert. A parameterization of moist convection for general circulation models. Mon Weather Rev 120(6):978–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rummukainen M (2010) State-of-the-art with regional climate models. WIREs Clim Change 1:82–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shchepetkin AF, McWilliams JC (2005) The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): a split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model. Ocean Modelling 9(4):347–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shukla J, Hagedorn R, Hoskins B, Kinter J, Marotzke J, Miller M, Palmer TN, Slingo J (2009) Revolution in climate prediction is both necessary and possible: a declaration at the world modelling summit for climate prediction. Bull Am Meteol Soc 2:175–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Siqueira L, Kirtman BP (2016) Atlantic near-term climate variability and the role of a resolved Gulf Stream. Geophys Res Lett 43:3964–3972. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith SK (2005) Florida Population Growth: Past, Present and Future. Research Report by the Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. Retrieved from:
  48. Steidinger KA (1975) Basic factors influencing red tides. Florida Department of Natural Resources Marine Research Laboratory, 153–162Google Scholar
  49. Suarez M, Bacmeister J (2015) Development of the GEOS-5 atmospheric general circulation model: evolution from MERRA to MERRA2. Geosci. Model Dev 8:1339–1356. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tatsumi Y (1986) A spectral limited area model with time dependent lateral boundary conditions and its application to a multi-level primitive equation model. J Meteor Soc Japan 64:637–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tiedtke M (1983) The sensitivity of the time-mean large-scale flow to cumulus convection in the ECMWF model. In: Proceedings of ECMWF Workshop on Convective in Large-scale Models. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, United Kingdom. 297–316Google Scholar
  52. Tolbert WH, Salsman GG (1964) Surface circulation of the eastern Gulf of Mexico as determined by drift bottled studies. J Geophys Res 69:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Umlauf L, Burchard H (2003) A generic length-scale equation for geophysical turbulence models. J Mar Res 61(2):235–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van Vuuren DP, Edmonds JA, Kainuma M et al (2011) A special issue on the RCPs. Clim Change 109:1–4. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weisberg RH, He R, Kirkpatrick G, Muller-Karger F, Walsh JJ (2004) A West Florida Shelf case study: coastal ocean circulation on remotely sensed, Oceanography, 70–75Google Scholar
  56. Weisberg RH, Zheng L, Liu Y (2016a) West Florida shelf upwelling: Origins and pathways. J Geophys Res Oceans 121:5672–5681. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weisberg RH, Zheng L, Liu Y (2016b) West Florida shelf upwelling: Origins and pathways. J Geophys Res (oceans) 121:56772–5681Google Scholar
  58. Wilby RL, Wigley TM (1997) Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations. Prog Phys Geogr 21(4):530–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilks D (2011) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. 3rd edn, Int Geophys Ser 100: 704 ppGoogle Scholar
  60. Yang H, Weisberg RH (1999) West Florida continental shelf circulation response to climatological wind forcing. J Geophys Res 104:5301–5320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhao Q, Carr FH (1997) A prognostic cloud scheme for operational NWP models. Mon Weather Rev 125(8):1931–1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. (2014) The Gulf of Mexico ECOHAB: Karenia Program 2006–2012, Harmful Algae, 38, 3–7,

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction StudiesFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Florida Climate InstituteFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric ScienceFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations