Advertisement

Inter-hemispheric differences in energy budgets and cross-equatorial transport anomalies during the 20th century

  • Valerio LemboEmail author
  • Doris Folini
  • Martin Wild
  • Piero Lionello
Article

Abstract

We analyze the evolution of inter-hemispheric asymmetries in the energy budgets (EBs) and near-surface temperature anomalies during the 20th century, as given in Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project, phase 5 (CMIP5) simulations. We also consider the cross-equatorial energy transports (CET) in the atmosphere and in the oceans, in order to evidence how EB asymmetries affect the redistribution of energy between the two hemispheres. Two different experimental settings have been considered, one including only the spatially homogeneous evolving greenhouse gas forcing (GHG), and another one a realistic superposition of all known evolving forcings (ALL), such as aerosols and volcanic eruptions. This study shows that, according to the CMIP5 models, the response of the climate system to the ongoing forcing during the 20th century has differed substantially from what would have resulted from an increase in GHG concentration alone. In the GHG ensemble the Northern Hemisphere (NH) warms more than the Southern Hemisphere (SH), while both hemispheres exhibit similar and positive EB anomalies at the TOA, mainly due to increasing shortwave absorption and with no significant variations of cross-equatorial energy transports. On the contrary, in the ALL ensemble the two hemispheres warm similarly, while the SH exhibits a positive EB anomaly twice as large as in the NH, due to a reduced LW emission (Outgoing Longwave Radiation, OLR) in the SH, with oceanic CET anomalies directed towards the NH. The EB asymmetry in ALL is ascribed to the asymmetry in OLR changes, which is explained by the different role of clouds in the two hemispheres. The ocean heat content (OHC) tendency per unit surface area is similar in the two hemispheres, so that the asymmetries in ALL EB determine CET changes. We evidence that CET changes in the ALL ensemble are associated with the inter-hemispheric asymmetry in the aerosol forcing, which is stronger in the NH than in the SH. We find no significant relation between CETs and inter-hemispheric near-surface temperature asymmetries in GHG, partly due to the large model spread. Generally, deficits in modeled CET for present-day conditions are not ascribed to forcings and feedbacks, rather they are intrinsic to the models.

Keywords

Global energy budget Cross-equatorial heat transports GHG forcing CMIP5 historical simulations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank Christian Franzke, Norman Loeb and Valerio Lucarini for the useful comments and suggestions. They acknowledge the international modeling groups for providing their data for analysis, the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) for collecting and archiving the model data, the JSC/CLIVAR Working Group on Coupled Modeling (WGCM) and their Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) and Climate Simulation Panel for organizing the model data analysis activity, and the IPCC WG1 TSU for technical support. The IPCC Data Archive at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is supported by the Office of Science, US Department of Energy. Valerio Lembo is funded by the Collaborative Research Centre TRR181 “Energy Transfers in Atmosphere and Ocean” funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)-Projektnummer 274762653.

References

  1. Adam O, Bischoff T, Schneider T (2016) Seasonal and interannual variations of the energy flux equator and ITCZ. Part I: Zonally averaged ITCZ position. J Clim 29:3219–3230.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0512.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam O, Schneider T, Brient F, Bischoff T (2016) Relation of the double-ITCZ bias to the atmospheric energy budget in climate models. Geophys Res Lett 43:7670–7677.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069465 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen RJ (2015) A 21st century northward tropical precipitation shift caused by future anthropogenic aerosol reductions. J Geophys Res 120:9087–9102.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023623 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andres RJ, Marland G, Fung I, Matthews E (1996) A 1\(^\circ\) \(\times\) 1\(^\circ\) distribution of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement manufacture, 1950–1990. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 10:419–429.  https://doi.org/10.1029/96GB01523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bischoff T, Schneider T (2014) Energetic constraints on the position of the intertropical convergence zone. J Clim 27:4937–4951.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00650.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bony S, Colman R, Kattsov VM (2006) How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes? J Clim 19:3445–3482.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3819.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown PT, Li W, Jiang JH, Su H (2015) Unforced surface air temperature variability and its contrasting relationship with the anomalous TOA energy flux at local and global spatial scales. J Clim 29:925–940.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0384.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark SK, Ming Y, Held IM, Phillipps PJ (2018) The role of the water vapor feedback in the ITCZ response to hemispherically asymmetric forcing. J Clim 31:3659–3678.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0723.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dallafior TN, Folini D, Knutti R, Wild M (2015) Dimming over the oceans: transient anthropogenic aerosol plumes in the 20th century. J Geophys Res Atmos 120:3465–3484.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022658 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donohoe A, Marshall J, Ferreira D, Mcgee D (2013) The relationship between ITCZ location and cross-equatorial atmospheric heat transport: from the seasonal cycle to the last glacial maximum. J Clim 26:3597–3618.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00467.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donohoe A, Armour KC, Pendergrass AG, Battisti DS (2014) Shortwave and longwave radiative contributions to global warming under increasing CO\(_{2}\). Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:16700–16705.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412190111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drost F, Karoly D (2012) Evaluating global climate responses to different forcings using simple indices. Geophys Res Lett 39:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052667 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eyring V, Bony S, Meehl GA (2016) Overview of the coupled model intercomparison project phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci Model Dev 9:1937–1958.  https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedman AR, Hwang Y-T, Chiang JCH, Frierson DMW (2013) Interhemispheric temperature asymmetry over the twentieth century and in future projections. J Clim 26:5419–5433.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00525.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Golaz J-C, Horowitz LW, Levy H (2013) Cloud tuning in a coupled climate model: impact on 20th century warming. Geophys Res Lett 40:2246–2251.  https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hartmann DL (1994) Global Physical climatology. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Hegerl GC, Zwiers FW, Braconnot P (2007) Understanding and attributing climate change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 663–745 (ISBN 9780521705967) Google Scholar
  18. Held IM, Soden BJ (2000) Water vapor feedback and global warming. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25:441–475.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Held IM, Soden BJ (2006) Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Clim 19:5686–5699.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3990.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Held IM (2001) The partitioning of the poleward energy transport between the tropical ocean and atmosphere. J Atmos Sci 58:943–948.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<0943:TPOTPE>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill SA, Ming Y, Held IM (2014) Mechanisms of forced tropical meridional energy flux change. J Clim 28:1725–1742.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00165.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hobbs W, Palmer MD, Monselesan D (2016) An energy conservation analysis of ocean drift in the CMIP5 global coupled models. J Clim 29:1639–1653.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0477.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Houghton, RA (2008) Carbon flux to the atmosphere from land-use changes: 1850–2005. In TRENDS: a compendium of data on global change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Hourdin F, Mauritsen T, Gettelman A (2017) The art and science of climate model tuning. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 98:589–602.  https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00135.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huang Y, Zhang M (2014) The implication of radiative forcing and feedback for meridional energy transport. Geophys Res Lett 41:1665–1672.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL059079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hwang Y-T, Frierson DMW (2013) Link between the double-intertropical convergence zone problem and cloud biases over the Southern Ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:4935–4940.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213302110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kang SM, Held IM, Frierson DMW, Zhao M (2008) The response of the ITCZ to extratropical thermal forcing: idealized slab-ocean experiments with a GCM. J Clim 21:3521–3532.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI2146.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lembo V, Folini D, Wild M, Lionello P (2016) Energy budgets and transports: global evolution and spatial patterns during the 20th century as estimated in two AMIP-like experiments. Clim Dyn 45:1793.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3173-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levitus S, Antonov JI, Boyer TP et al (2012) World ocean heat content and thermosteric sea level change (0–2000 m) 1955–2010. Geophys Res Lett 39:10.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Loeb NG, Lyman JM, Johnson GC et al (2012) Observed changes in top-of-the-atmosphere radiation and upper-ocean heating consistent within uncertainty. Nat Geosci 5:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loeb NG, Wang H, Cheng A et al (2015) Observational constraints on atmospheric and oceanic cross-equatorial heat transports: revisiting the precipitation asymmetry problem in climate models. Clim Dyn 46:3239.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2766-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lucarini V, Ragone F (2011) Energetics of PCMDI/CMIP3 climate models: energy budget and meridional enthalpy transport. Rev Geophys 49:RG1001.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009RG000323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lucarini V, Blender R, Herbert C et al (2014) Mathematical and physical ideas for climate science. Rev Geophys 52:809–859.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mauritsen T, Stevens B, Roeckner E et al (2012) Tuning the climate of a global model. J Adv Model Earth Syst 4:M00A01.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McFarlane AA, Frierson DMW (2017) The role of ocean fluxes and radiative forcings in determining tropical rainfall shifts in RCP8.5 simulations. Geophys Res Lett 44:8656–8664.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meinshausen M, Smith SJ, Calvin K et al (2011) The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim Change 109:213–241.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nam C, Bony S, Dufresne JL, Chepfer H (2012) The too few, too bright tropical low-cloud problem in CMIP5 models. Geophys Res Lett 39:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053421 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Palmer MD, McNeall DJ, Dunstone NJ (2011) Importance of the deep ocean for estimating decadal changes in Earths radiation balance. Geophys Res Lett 38:L13707.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047835 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Palmer MD, McNeall DJ (2014) Internal variability of Earths energy budget simulated by CMIP5 climate models. Environ Res Lett 9:34016.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Palmer MD (2017) Reconciling estimates of ocean heating and earths radiation budget. Curr Clim Chang Rep 3:78–86.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-016-0053-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Paynter D, Frölicher TL (2015) Sensitivity of radiative forcing, ocean heat uptake, and climate feedback to changes in anthropogenic greenhouse gases and aerosols. J Geophys Res Atmos 120:9837–9854.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peixoto JP, Oort AH (1992) Physics of climate. American Institute of Physics, New York, p 520Google Scholar
  43. Roelofs GJ (2013) A steady-state analysis of the temperature responses of water vapor and aerosol lifetimes. Atmos Chem Phys 13:8245–8254.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8245-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rotstayn LD, Collier MA, Shindell DT (2015) Why does aerosol forcing control historical global-mean surface temperature change in CMIP5 models? J Clim 28:6608–6625.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00712.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schneider T, Held IM (2001) Discriminants of twentieth-century changes in earth surface temperatures. J Clim 14:249–254.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<0943:TPOTPE>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schneider T, Bischoff T, Haug GH (2014) Migrations and dynamics of the Intertropical Convergence Zone. Nature 513:45–53.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shindell DT, Faluvegi G, Rotstayn L, Milly G (2015) Spatial patterns of radiative forcing and surface temperature response. J Geophys Res Atmos 120:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022752 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Slingo A, Webb MJ (1997) The spectral signature of global warming. Q J R Meteorol Soc 123:293–307.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712353803 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith DM, Allan RP, Coward AC et al (2015) Earth’s energy imbalance since 1960 in observations and CMIP5 models. Geophys Res Lett 42:1205–1213.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stephens GL, Hakuba MZ, Hawcroft M (2016) The curious nature of the hemispheric symmetry of the earths water and energy balances. Curr Clim Chang Rep 2:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-016-0043-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stevens B (2015) Rethinking the lower bound on aerosol radiative forcing. J Clim 28:4794–4819.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00656.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K et al (2013) IPCC, 2013: climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC AR5:1535Google Scholar
  53. Stone PH (1978) Constraints on dynamical transports of energy on a spherical planet. Dyn Atmos Ocean 2:123–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0265(78)90006-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498.  https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Trenberth KE, Solomon A (1994) The global heat-balance—heat transports in the atmosphere and ocean. Clim Dyn 10:107–134.  https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf00210625 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trenberth KE, Caron JM, Stepaniak DP (2001) The atmospheric energy budget and implications for surface fluxes and ocean heat transports. Clim Dyn 17:259–276.  https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00007927 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Trenberth KE, Fasullo JT (2010) Simulation of present-day and twenty-first-century energy budgets of the southern oceans. J Clim 23:440–454.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3152.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Trenberth KE, Fasullo JT, Mackaro J (2011) Atmospheric moisture transports from ocean to land and global energy flows in reanalyses. J Clim 24:4907–4924.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4171.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Trenberth KE, Fasullo JT, Balmaseda MA (2014) Earths energy imbalance. J Clim 27(9):3129–3144.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00294.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Voigt A, Stevens B, Bader J, Mauritsen T (2014) Compensation of hemispheric Albedo asymmetries by shifts of the ITCZ and tropical clouds. J Clim 27:1029–1045.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00205.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. von Schuckmann K, Palmer MD, Trenberth KE et al (2016) An imperative to monitor Earths energy imbalance. Nat Clim Chang 6:138–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wijffels S, Roemmich D, Monselesan D et al (2016) Ocean temperatures chronicle the ongoing warming of Earth. Nat Clim Chang 6:116–118.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2924 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wild M (2012) Enlightening global dimming and brightening. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:27–37.  https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00074.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche e Ambientali (Di.S.Te.B.A.)Universitá del SalentoLecceItaly
  2. 2.Meteorological Institute, Center for Earth System Research and SustainabilityHamburgGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Atmospheric and Climate ScienceZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations