Why do we have El Niño: quantifying a diabatic and nonlinear perspective using observations
El Niño, due to its global impact on weather patterns, ecosystems, agriculture and public health, has become as commonly known to the public as the recent global warming. But why we have El Niño is not yet as well answered as it may have been assumed. Linear theories have been successful in explaining the transition from the warm phase to the cold phase of the eastern tropical Pacific that results from the rise and fall of El Niño, but failed to explain the asymmetry between the two phases. A nonlinear theory for El Niño has suggested that there exist two equilibrium states for the tropical Pacific—one is zonally symmetric (or nearly so) with the warm-pool extending all the way to the eastern Pacific, and the other is strongly zonally asymmetric with the warm-pool confined to the western half of the tropical Pacific. Under this hypothesis, ENSO results from the fact that under the current radiative heating, both states are unstable, resulting in the apparent “wandering” behavior in between these two states as seen in the observations. To test this hypothesis, the authors have obtained the best approximations for the two equilibrium states empirically using updated ocean assimilation data, and quantified the stability of these two empirically obtained equilibrium states using two stability analysis methods. The results suggest that the two states are unstable, offering support for the nonlinear view of why we have El Niño.
KeywordsEl Niño Heat transport Ocean–atmosphere dynamics, nonlinear dynamics Climate variability and change
This work was supported by the ESS program of the climate program office of NOAA (GC14-244), the large-scale and climate dynamics program of NSF (AGS0852329 and AGS1444489), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41606011), the State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41530426), and the Basic Scientific Research and Operation Foundation of CAMS (No. 2017Y007).
- Behringer D, Xue Y (2004) Evaluation of the global ocean data assimilation system at NCEP: The Pacific Ocean. In: Eighth symp. on integrated observing and assimilation systems for atmosphere, oceans, and Land Surface, Seattle, WA, Amer Meteor Soc 2.3. https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/70720.pdf (Preprints)
- Hales S, Weinstein P, Sourares Y, Woodward A (1999) El Nino and the dynamics of vectorborne disease transmission. Environ Health Perspect 107:99–102Google Scholar
- Lijuan Huaa, De-Zheng Sunb, Yongqiang Yuc Google Scholar
- Lorenz E (1963) Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci 20:131–141, 1963Google Scholar
- Stephens C, Antonov JI, Boyer TP, Conkright ME, Locarnini RA, O’Brien TD, Garcia HE (2002) Temperature, vol 1. World Ocean Atlas 2001, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 49 (+CD-ROMs), pp 167Google Scholar
- Strogatz SH (1994) Nonlinear dynamics and chaos. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Menlo Park, pp 498Google Scholar
- Sun D-Z (2000) Global climate change and ENSO: a theoretical framework. In: Diaz HF, Markgraf V (eds) El Niño: historical and paleoclimatic aspects of the southern oscillation, multiscale variability, and global and regional impacts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 443–463Google Scholar