On the variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation transports in coupled CMIP5 simulations
- 410 Downloads
The Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) plays a fundamental role in the climate system, and long-term climate simulations are used to understand the AMOC variability and to assess its impact. This study examines the basic characteristics of the AMOC variability in 44 CMIP5 (Phase 5 of the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project) simulations, using the 18 atmospherically-forced CORE-II (Phase 2 of the Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiment) simulations as a reference. The analysis shows that on interannual and decadal timescales, the AMOC variability in the CMIP5 exhibits a similar magnitude and meridional coherence as in the CORE-II simulations, indicating that the modeled atmospheric variability responsible for AMOC variability in the CMIP5 is in reasonable agreement with the CORE-II forcing. On multidecadal timescales, however, the AMOC variability is weaker by a factor of more than 2 and meridionally less coherent in the CMIP5 than in the CORE-II simulations. The CMIP5 simulations also exhibit a weaker long-term atmospheric variability in the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). However, one cannot fully attribute the weaker AMOC variability to the weaker variability in NAO because, unlike the CORE-II simulations, the CMIP5 simulations do not exhibit a robust NAO-AMOC linkage. While the variability of the wintertime heat flux and mixed layer depth in the western subpolar North Atlantic is strongly linked to the AMOC variability, the NAO variability is not.
The work is supported by the NOAA-Earth System Prediction Capability Project (Award NA15OAR4320064) and by the NOAA Climate Program Office MAPP Program (Award NA15OAR4310088). The authors thank Drs. Kim and Danabasoglu for providing the preprocessed AMOC transports from 18 CORE-II simulations. The authors also thank three reviewers for their constructive suggestions, which improved the paper greatly.
- Collins M et al (2013) The physical science basis. In: Qin TF, Plattner D, Tignor GK, Allen M, Boschung SK, Nauels J, Xia A, Bex YV, Midgley PM (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Stocker]. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Delworth TL, Zhang R, Mann ME (2007) Decadal to centennial variability of the Atlantic from observations and models. In: Schmittner A, Chiang JCH, Hemming SR (eds) Ocean circulation: mechanisms and impacts-past and future changes of meridional overturning. AGU, Washington, D. C., pp 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1029/173GM10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hurrell JW, Kushnir Y, Ottersen G, Visbeck M (2003) An overview of the North Atlantic Oscillation. In: Hurrell JW, Kushnir Y, Ottersen G, Visbeck M (eds) North Atlantic Oscillation: climate significance and environmental impact, geophysical monograph series. AGU, Washington, pp 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1029/134GM01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kirtman B et al (2013) Near-term climate change: projections and predictability. In: Qin TF, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds.) Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Large WG, Yeager SG (2004) Diurnal to decadal global forcing for ocean and sea-ice models: the data sets and flux climatologies. National Center for Atmospheric Research, BoulderGoogle Scholar