Advertisement

Atmosphere surface storm track response to resolved ocean mesoscale in two sets of global climate model experiments

  • R. Justin Small
  • Rym Msadek
  • Young-Oh Kwon
  • James F. Booth
  • Colin Zarzycki
Article

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that the ocean mesoscale (particularly ocean fronts) can affect the strength and location of the overlying extratropical atmospheric storm track. In this paper, we examine whether resolving ocean fronts in global climate models indeed leads to significant improvement in the simulated storm track, defined using low level meridional wind. Two main sets of experiments are used: (i) global climate model Community Earth System Model version 1 with non-eddy-resolving standard resolution or with ocean eddy-resolving resolution, and (ii) the same but with the GFDL Climate Model version 2. In case (i), it is found that higher ocean resolution leads to a reduction of a very warm sea surface temperature (SST) bias at the east coasts of the U.S. and Japan seen in standard resolution models. This in turn leads to a reduction of storm track strength near the coastlines, by up to 20%, and a better location of the storm track maxima, over the western boundary currents as observed. In case (ii), the change in absolute SST bias in these regions is less notable, and there are modest (10% or less) increases in surface storm track, and smaller changes in the free troposphere. In contrast, in the southern Indian Ocean, case (ii) shows most sensitivity to ocean resolution, and this coincides with a larger change in mean SST as ocean resolution is changed. Where the ocean resolution does make a difference, it consistently brings the storm track closer in appearance to that seen in ERA-Interim Reanalysis data. Overall, for the range of ocean model resolutions used here (1° versus 0.1°) we find that the differences in SST gradient have a small effect on the storm track strength whilst changes in absolute SST between experiments can have a larger effect. The latter affects the land–sea contrast, air–sea stability, surface latent heat flux, and the boundary layer baroclinicity in such a way as to reduce storm track activity adjacent to the western boundary in the N. Hemisphere storm tracks, but strengthens the storm track over the southern Indian Ocean. A note of caution is that the results are sensitive to the choice of storm track metric. The results are contrasted with those from a high resolution coupled simulation where the SST is smoothed for the purposes of computing air–sea fluxes, an alternative method of testing sensitivity to SST gradients.

Notes

Acknowledgements

An anonymous reviewer is thanked for constructive comments on the paper, especially for suggesting a more detailed assessment against ERA-Interim Reanalysis. CESM1 was a community development effort, as described in Hurrell et al. (2013), for which we are very grateful. The CESM1 simulations described in this paper were performed at NCAR Wyoming Supercomputer Center. We also thank Tom Delworth, Gabriel Vecchi and all the scientists at GFDL who invested time and resources to produce the GFDL CM simulations used in this research. RJS was supported by Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research, via the Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SCIDAC) project number SC0006743,and National Science Foundation (NSF) Collaborative Research: EaSM-3: Regional decadal predictions of coupled climate-human systems 1419585. Y-OK was supported by NSF Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Science Climate and Large-scale Dynamics Program (AGS-1355339), NASA Physical Oceanography Program (NNX13AM59G), and DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research Regional and Global Climate Modeling Program (DE-SC0014433). JFB was partially supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Program Office’s Modeling, Analysis, Predictions, and Projections program, Grant #NA15OAR4310094. R. Msadek was supported by GFDL and UCAR when the GFDL simulations used in this paper were produced and analyzed. We thank Steve Griffies for helping interpreting the results. Discussions with Hisashi Nakamura, Niklas Schneider and Shoshiro Minobe were very appreciated.

Supplementary material

382_2018_4237_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (2.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 2257 KB)

References

  1. Bishop SP, Bryan FO, Small RJ (2015) Bjerknes-like compensation in the wintertime North Pacific. J Phys Oceanogr 45:1339–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Booth JF, Thompson L, Patoux J, Kelly KA, Dickinson S (2010) The signature of midlatitude tropospheric storm tracks in the surface winds. J Clim 23:1160–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booth JF, Thompson L, Patoux J, Kelly KA (2012) Sensitivity of midlatitude storm intensification to perturbations in the sea surface temperature near the Gulf Stream. Mon Weather Rev 140:1241–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booth JF, Kwon Y-O, Ko S, Small RJ, Msadek R (2017) Spatial patterns and intensity of the surface storm tracks in CMIP5 models. J Clim 30:4965–4981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brayshaw DJ, Hoskins B, Blackburn M (2009) The basic ingredients of the North Atlantic storm track. Part I: Land–sea contrast and orography. J Atmos Sci 66:2539–2558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brayshaw DJ, Hoskins B, Blackburn M (2011) The basic ingredients of the North Atlantic storm track. Part II: Sea surface temperatures. J Atmos Sci 68:1784–1805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryan FO, Tomas R, Dennis JM, Chelton DB, Loeb NG, McClean JL (2010) Frontal scale air–sea interaction in high-resolution coupled climate models. J Clim 23:6277–6291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Businger S, Graziano TM, Kaplan ML, Rozumalski RA (2005) Cold-air cyclogenesis along the Gulf Stream front: investigation of diabatic impacts on cyclone development, frontal structure and track. Meteorol Atmos Phys 88:65–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Catto JL, Jakob C, Berry G, Nicholls N (2012) Relating global precipitation to atmospheric fronts. Geophys Res Letts 39:L10805.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang EKM, Lee S, Swanson KL (2002) Storm track dynamics. J Clim 15:2163–2183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colle BA, Zhang Z, Lombardo KA, Chang E, Liu P, Zhang M (2013) Historical evaluation and future prediction of eastern North American and Western Atlantic extratropical cyclones in the CMIP5 models during the cold season. J Clim 26:6882–6903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Czaja A, Blunt N (2011) A new mechanism for ocean–atmosphere coupling in midlatitudes. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137:1095–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Danabasoglu G, Bates SC, Briegleb BP, Jayne SR, Jochum M, Large WG, Peacock S, Yeager SG (2012) The CCSM4 ocean component. J Clim 25:1361–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delworth TL et al (2006) GFDL’s CM2 global coupled climate models. Part I: formulation and simulation characteristics. J Clim 19:643–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delworth TL et al (2012) Simulated climate change in the GFDL CM2.5 high-resolution coupled climate model. J Clim 25:2755–2781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dee DP, 35 co-authors (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137:553–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eady ET (1949) Long waves and cyclone waves. Tellus 1:33–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gent PR, McWilliams JC (1990) Isopycnal mixing in ocean circulation models. J Phys Oceanogr 20:150–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gent PR et al (2011) The community climate system model version 4. J Clim 24:4973–4991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffies SM et al (2014) Impacts on ocean heat from transient mesoscale eddies in a hierarchy of climate models. J Clim 28:952–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guo Y, Chang EKM, Leroy SS (2009) How strong are the southern hemisphere storm tracks? Geophys. Res Lett 36:L22806.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040733 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoskins BJ, Hodges KI (2002) New perspectives on the Northern hemisphere winter storm tracks. J Atmos Sci 59:1041–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoskins BJ, Hodges KI (2005) A new perspective on Southern hemisphere storm tracks. J Clim 18:4108–4129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoskins BJ, Valdes PJ (1990) On the existence of storm tracks. J Atmos Sci 47:1854–1864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hunke EC, Lipscomb WH (2008) CICE: the Los Alamos sea ice model user’s manual, version 4. In: Los Alamos National Laboratory technical report LA-CC-06-012Google Scholar
  26. Hurrell JW, and Coauthors (2013) The community Earth system model: a framework for collaborative research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:1339–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hurrell JW, Hack JJ, Shea D, Caron JM, Rosinski J (2008) A new sea surface temperature and sea ice boundary dataset for the community atmosphere model. J Clim 21:5145–5153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Joyce TM, Kwon Y-O, Yu L (2009) On the relationship between synoptic wintertime atmospheric variability and path shifts in the Gulf Stream and the Kuroshio extension. J Clim 22:3177–3192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuo Y-H, Reed RJ, Low-Nam S (1991) Effects of surface energy fluxes during the early development and rapid intensification stages of seven explosive cyclones in the western Atlantic. Mon Weather Rev 119:457–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuwano-Yoshida A, Minobe S (2017) Storm-track response to SST fronts in the Northwestern Pacific in an AGCM. J Clim 30:1081–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kuwano-Yoshida A, Minobe S, Xie S-P (2010) Precipitation response to the Gulf Stream in an atmospheric GCM. J Clim 23:3676–3698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Large WG, Yeager SG (2009) The global climatology of an interannually varying air–sea flux data set. Clim Dyn 33:341–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lawrence DM et al (2011) Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the community land model. J Adv Model Earth Syst 3:2011MS000045Google Scholar
  34. Liu WT, Tang W (1996) Equivalent neutral wind. JPL Publication 96-17. http://www.ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19970010322.pdf
  35. Liu JW, Zhang S-P, Xie S-P (2013) Two types of surface wind response to the East China Sea Kuroshio Front. J Clim 26:8616–8627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lorenz DJ, Hartmann DL (2001) Eddy-zonal flow feedback in the Southern Hemisphere. J Atmos Sci 58:3312–3327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ma X, co-authors (2016) Western boundary currents regulated by interaction between ocean eddies and the atmosphere. Nature 535:533–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ma X, Chang P, Saravanan R, Montuoro R, Hsieh J-S, Wu D, Lin X, Wu L (2015) Distant influence of Kuroshio eddies on North Pacific weather patterns. Sci Rep 5:17785  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17785 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ma X, Chang P, Saravanan R, Montuoro R, Nakamura H, Wu D, Lin X, Wu L (2017) Importance of resolving Kuroshio Front and eddy influence in simulating the North Pacific storm track. J Clim 30:1861–1880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Minobe S, Kuwano-Yoshida A, Komori N, Xie S-P, Small RJ (2008) Influence of the Gulf Stream on the troposphere. Nature 452:206–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Minobe S, Miyashita M, Kuwano-Yoshida A, Tokinaga H, Xie S-P (2010) Atmospheric response to the Gulf Stream: seasonal variations. J Clim 23:3699–3719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nakamura M, Yamane S (2009) Dominant Anomaly Patterns in the Near-Surface Baroclinicity and Accompanying Anomalies in the Atmosphere and Oceans. Part I: North Atlantic Basin. J Clim 22:880–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nakamura H, Sampe T, Tanimoto Y, Shimpo A (2004) Observed associations among storm tracks, jet streams and midlatitude oceanic fronts. AGU Geophys Mono Ser 147:329–345Google Scholar
  44. Nakamura H, Sampe T, Goto A, Ohfuchi W, Xie S-P (2008) On the importance of midlatitude frontal zones for the mean state and dominant variability in the tropospheric circulation. Geophys Res Lett 35:L15709.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neu U et al (2013) IMILAST: a community effort to intercompare extratropical cyclone detection and tracking algorithms. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:529–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Neill LW, Haack T, Chelton DB, Skyllingstad E (2017) The Gulf Stream convergence zone in the time-mean winds. J Clim 74:2383–2412Google Scholar
  47. Ogawa F, Nakamura H, Nishii K, Miyasaka T, Kuwano-Yoshida A (2012) Dependence of the climatological axial latitudes of the tropospheric westerlies and storm tracks on the latitude of an extratropical oceanic front. Geophys Res Lett 39:2011GL049922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parfitt R, Czaja A (2016) On the contribution of synoptic transients to the mean atmospheric state in the Gulf Stream region. Q J R Meteorol Soc 142:1554–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Park S, Bretherton CS, Rasch PJ (2014) Integrating cloud processes in the community atmosphere model, version 5. J Clim 27:6821–6856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Piazza M, Terray L, Boe J, Maisonnave E, Sanchez-Gomez E (2016) Influence of small-scale North Atlantic sea surface temperature patterns on the marine boundary layer and free troposphere: a study using the atmospheric ARPEGE model. Clim Dyn 46: 1699–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Putnam WM, Lin S-S (2007) Finite volume transport on various cubed sphere grids J. Comput Phys 227:55–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reynolds RW, Smith TM, Liu C, Chelton DB, Casey KS, Schlax MG (2007) Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J Clim 20:5473–5496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Roberts MJ, Hewitt HT, Hyder P, Ferreira D, Josey SA, Mizielinski M, Shelly A (2016) Impact of ocean resolution on coupled air-sea fluxes and large-scale climate Geophys Res Lett 43:10430–10438.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070559 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saba VS et al (2016) Enhanced warming of the Northwest Atlantic Ocean under climate change. J Geophys Res Ocean 121:118–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sheldon L, Czaja A, Vanniere B, Morcrette C, Sohet B, Casado M, Smith D (2017) A warm path to Gulf Stream–troposphere interactions. Tellus 69:1–13Google Scholar
  56. Simpson IR, Bacmeister JT, Sandu I, Rodwell MJ (2018) Why do modelled and observed surface wind stress climatologies differ in the trade wind regions? J Clim 31:491–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Small RJ, Tomas RA, Bryan FO (2014a) Storm track response to Ocean Fronts in a global high-resolution climate model. Clim Dyn 43:805–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Small RJ et al (2014b) A new synoptic scale resolving global climate simulation using the community earth system model. J Adv Model Earth Syst 6:1065–1094.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smirnov D, Newman M, Alexander MA, Kwon Y-O, Frankignoul C (2015) Investigating the local atmospheric response to a realistic shift in the Oyashio Sea surface temperature front. J Clim 28:1126–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith RD et al (2010), The parallel ocean program (POP) reference manual. In: Los Alamos National Laboratory technical report LAUR-10-01853Google Scholar
  61. Stoelinga MT (1996) A potential vorticity-based study of the role of diabatic heating and friction in a numerically simulated baroclinic cyclone. Mon Weather Rev 124:849–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taguchi B, Nakamura H, Nonaka M, Xie S-P (2009) Influences of the Kuroshio/Oyashio extensions on air-sea heat exchanges and storm track activity as revealed in regional atmospheric model simulations for the 2003/04 cold season. J Clim 22:6536–6560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Trenberth KE (1991) Storm tracks in the southern hemisphere. J Atmos Sci 48:2159–2178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vecchi GA et al (2014) On the seasonal forecasting of regional Tropical Cyclone activity. J Clim 27: 7994–8016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ullrich PA, Zarzycki CM (2017) TempestExtremes: a framework for scale-insensitive pointwise feature tracking on unstructured grids. Geosci Model Dev 10:1069–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wallace JM, Lim G-H, Blackmon ML (1988) Relationship between cyclone tracks, anticyclone tracks and baroclinic waveguides. J Atmos Sci 45:439–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wang CL, Zhang S-K, Lee L, Wu, Mechoso CR (2014) A global perspective on CMIP5 climate model biases. Nat Clim Change 4:201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weese SR, Bryan FO (2006) Climate impacts of systematic errors in the simulation of the path of the North Atlantic current. Geophys Res Lett 33:L19708.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Weijer W, and co-authors (2012) The Southern Ocean and its climate in CCSM4. J Clim 25:2652–2675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Willison J, Robinson WA, Lackmann GM (2013) The importance of resolving mesoscale latent heating in the North Atlantic storm track. J Atmos Sci 70:2234–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Woollings T, Hoskins B, Blackburn M, Hassell D, Hodges K (2010) Storm track sensitivity to sea surface temperature resolution in a regional atmosphere model. Clim Dyn 35:341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Climate and Global Dynamics DivisionNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA
  2. 2.CECI UMR 5318CNRS/CERFACSToulouseFrance
  3. 3.Woods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA
  4. 4.City CollegeCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.Climate and Global DynamicsNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations