Advertisement

Ice versus liquid water saturation in simulations of the Indian summer monsoon

  • Russell H. Glazer
  • Vasubandhu Misra
Article

Abstract

At the same temperature, below 0 °C, the saturation vapor pressure (SVP) over ice is slightly less than the SVP over liquid water. Numerical models use the Clausius–Clapeyron relation to calculate the SVP and relative humidity, but there is not a consistent method for the treatment of saturation above the freezing level where ice and mixed-phase clouds may be present. In the context of current challenges presented by cloud microphysics in climate models, we argue that a better understanding of the impact that this treatment has on saturation-related processes like cloud formation and precipitation, is needed. This study explores the importance of the SVP calculation through model simulations of the Indian summer monsoon (ISM) using the regional spectral model (RSM) at 15 km grid spacing. A combination of seasonal and multiyear simulations is conducted with two saturation parameterizations. In one, the SVP over liquid water is prescribed through the entire atmospheric column (woIce), and in another the SVP over ice is used above the freezing level (wIce). When SVP over ice is prescribed, a thermodynamic drying of the middle and upper troposphere above the freezing level occurs due to increased condensation. In the wIce runs, the model responds to the slight decrease in the saturation condition by increasing, relative to the SVP over liquid water only run, grid-scale condensation of water. Increased grid-scale mean seasonal precipitation is noted across the ISM region in the simulation with SVP over ice prescribed. Modification of the middle and upper troposphere moisture results in a decrease in mean seasonal mid-level cloud amount and an increase in high cloud amount when SVP over ice is prescribed. Multiyear simulations strongly corroborate the qualitative results found in the seasonal simulations regarding the impact of ice versus liquid water SVP on the ISM’s mean precipitation and moisture field. The mean seasonal rainfall difference over All India between wIce and woIce is around 10% of the observed interannual variability of seasonal All India rainfall.

Keywords

Indian monsoon Regional modeling Saturation vapor pressure Cloud microphysics scheme 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the contributions of two anonymous reviewers to previous versions of the manuscript which greatly improved this study. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support given by the Earth System Science Organization, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India (Grant number MM/SERP/FSU/2014/SSC-02/002) to conduct this research under Monsoon Mission. We thank the Indian Meteorological Department for the availability of the daily rain analysis over India. Computing resources were provided by the Texas Advanced Computing Center at the University of Texas and XSEDE under Grant number ATM10010 and Florida State University’s High Performance Computer. The authors would also like to acknowledge Dr. Akhilesh Mishra at FSU COAPS for his advice and assistance in this work.

References

  1. Abhik S, Halder M, Mukhopadhyay P, Jiang X, Goswami BN (2013) A possible new mechanism for northward propagation of boreal summer intraseasonal oscillations based on TRMM and MERRA reanalysis. Clim Dyn 40:1611–1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abhik S, Krishna RPM, Mahakur M, Ganai M, Mukhopadhyay P, Dudhia J (2017) Revised cloud processes to improve the mean and intraseasonal variability of the Indian summer monsoon in climate forecast system: part 1. J Adv Model Earth Syst 9:1002–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashok K, Guan Z, Yamagata T (2001) Impact of the Indian Ocean dipole on the relationship between Indian monsoon rainfall and ENSO. Geophys Res Lett 28:4499–4502.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GLO13294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bony S, Stevens B, Frierson DMW, Jakob C, Kageyama M, Pincus R, Shepherd TG, Sherwood SC, Siebesma AP, Sobel AH, Watanabe M, Webb MJ (2015) Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity. Nat Geosci 8:261–268.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang FL, Li Z (2005) A near-global climatology of single-layer and overlapped clouds and their optical properties retrieved from Terra/MODIS data using a new algorithm. J Clim 18:4752–4771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chou M-D (1992) A solar radiation model for use in climate studies. J Atmos Sci 49:762–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chou M-D, Suarez MJ (1994) An efficient thermal infrared radiation parameterization for use in general circulation model. Technical report series on global modeling and data assimilation, NASA/TM-1994-104606, vol 3, p 85Google Scholar
  8. Dessler AE (2010) A determination of the cloud feedback from climate variations over the past decade. Science 330(6020):1523–1527.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192546 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donner LJ, Wyman BL, Hemler RS, Horowitz LW, Ming Y, Zhao M, Golaz J, Ginoux P, Lin S, Schwarzkopf MD, Austin J, Alaka G, Cooke WF, Delworth TL, Freidenreich SM, Gordon CT, Griffies SM, Held IM, Hurlin WJ, Klein SA, Knutson TR, Langenhorst AR, Lee H, Lin Y, Magi BI, Malyshev SL, Milly PC, Naik V, Nath MJ, Pincus R, Ploshay JJ, Ramaswamy V, Seman CJ, Shevliakova E, Sirutis JJ, Stern WF, Stouffer RJ, Wilson RJ, Winton M, Wittenberg AT, Zeng F (2011) The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3. J Clim 24:3484–3519.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI3955.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fowler LD, Randall DA, Rutledge SA (1996) Liquid and ice cloud microphysics in the CSU general circulation model. Part I: model description and simulated microphysical processes. J Clim 9:489–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gettelman A, Collins WD, Fetzer EJ, Eldering A, Irion FW, Duffy PB, Bala G (2006) Climatology of upper-tropospheric relative humidity from the atmospheric infrared sounder and implication for climate. J Clim 19:6104–6120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giorgetta MA, Jungclaus J, Reick CH, Legutke S, Bader J, Böttinger M, Brovkin V, Crueger T, Esch M, Fieg K, Glushak K, Gayler V, Haak H, Hollweg H-D, Ilyina T, Kinne S, Kornblueh L, Matei D, Mauritsen T, Mikolajewicz U, Mueller W, Notz D, Pithan F, Raddatz T, Rast S, Redler R, Roeckner E, Schmidt H, Schnur R, Segschneider J, Six KD, Stockhause M, Timmreck C, Wegner J, Widmann H, Wieners K-H, Claussen M, Marotzke J, Stevens B (2013) Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI-ESM simulations for the coupled model intercomparison project phase 5. J Adv Model Earth Syst 5:572–597.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goswami BN (1998) Interannual variation of Indian summer monsoon in a GCM: external condition versus internal feedbacks. J Clim 11:501–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goswami BB, Krishna RPM, Mukhopadhyay P, Khairoutdinov M, Goswarmi BN (2015) Simulation of the Indian summer monsoon in the superparameterized climate forecast system version 2: preliminary results. J Clim 28:8988–9012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hahn DG, J Shukla (1976) An apparent relationship between Eurasian snow cover and Indian monsoon rainfall. J Atmos Sci 33:2461–2462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huffman GJ, Bolvin DT, Adler RF (2012) GPCP version 1.2 1-degree daily (1DD) precipitation data set. World Data Center A, National climatic Data Center, AshevilleGoogle Scholar
  17. Jiang X, Waliser DE, Li JL, Woods C (2011) Vertical cloud structures of the boreal summer intraseasonal variability based on CloudSat observations and ERA-interim reanalysis. Clim Dyn 36:2219–2232.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0853-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Juang H-MH, Kanamitsu M (1994) The NMC nested regional spectral model. Mon Weather Rev 122.1:3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kanamaru H, Kanamitsu M (2007) Scale-selective bias correction in a downscaling of global reanalysis using a regional model. Mon Weather Rev 135:334–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J, Yang S-K, Hnilo JJ, Fiorino M, Potter GL (2002) NCEP-DOE AMIP-II reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1631–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanamitsu M, Yoshimura K, Yhang Y, Hong S (2010) Errors of interannual variability and multi-decadal trend in dynamical regional climate downscaling and its corrections. J Geophys Res 115:D17115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Korolev A, Isaac GA (2006) Relative humidity in liquid, mixed-phase, and ice clouds. J Atmos Sci 63:2865–2880.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3784.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Korolev A, Mazin IP (2003) Supersaturation of water vapor in clouds. J Atmos Sci 60:2957–2974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krishnamurthy V, Shukla J (2000) Intraseaonal and interannual variability of rainfall over India. J Clim 13:4366–4377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krishnamurthy V, Shukla J (2007) Intraseasonal and seasonally persisting patterns of Indian monsoon rainfall. J Clim 20:3–20.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3981.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar S, Hazra A, Goswami BN (2014) Role of interaction between dynamics, thermodynamics and cloud microphysics on the summer monsoon precipitating cloud over the Myanmar Coast and the Western Ghats. Clim Dyn 43:911–924.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1909-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li H, Misra V (2014) Thirty-two-year ocean-atmosphere coupled downscaling of global reanalysis over the Intra-American Seas. Clim Dyn 43:2471–2489.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2069-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li H, Kanamitsu M, Hong S-Y, Yoshimura K, Cayan DR, Misra V (2013a) A high-resolution ocean-atmosphere coupled downscaling of a present climate over California. Clim Dyn.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1670-7 Google Scholar
  29. Li H, Kanamitsu M, Hong S-Y, Yoshimura K, Cayan DR, Misra V, Sun L (2013b) Projected climate change scenario over California by a regional ocean-atmosphere coupled model system. Clim Change.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1025-8 Google Scholar
  30. Liebmann B, Smith CA (1996) Description of a complete (interpolated) outgoing longwave radiation dataset. Bull Am Metorol Soc 77:1275–1277Google Scholar
  31. Lohmann U, Roeckner E (1996) Design and performance of a new cloud microphysics scheme developed for the ECHAM general circulation model. Clim Dyn 12:557–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marx L (2002) New calculation of saturation specific humidity and saturation vapor pressure in the COLA atmospheric general circulation model. COLA Tech Rep 130:1–23 (Available from the Center for Ocean–Land–Atmosphere Studies, Calverton) Google Scholar
  33. Matus AV, L’Ecuyer TS (2017) The role of cloud phase in Earth’s radiation budget. J Geophys Res Atmos 122:2559–2578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meehl GA, Washington WM, Arblaster JM, Hu A, Teng H, Tebaldi C, Sanderson BN, Lamarque J, Conley A, Strand WG, White JB (2012) Climate system response to external forcings and climate change projections in CCSM4. J Clim 25:3661–3683.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00240.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moorthi S, Suarez MJ (1992) Relaxed Arakawa–Schubert. A parameterization of moist convection for general circulation models. Mon Weather Rev 120:978–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moorthi S, Pan HL, Caplan P (2001) Changes to the 2001 NCEP operational MRF/AVN global analysis/forecast system. NWS Tech Proced Bull 484:14Google Scholar
  37. Murphy DM, Koop T (2005) Review of the vapor pressures of ice and supercooled water for atmospheric applications. Q J R Meteorol Soc 131:1539–1565.  https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.94 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murray BJ, O’Sullivan D, Atkinson JD, Webb ME (2012) Ice nucleation by particles immersed in supercooled cloud droplets. Chem Soc Rev 41:6519–6554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parthasarathy B, Munot AA, Kothawale DR (1994) All India monthly and seasonal rainfall series: 1871–1993. Theor Appl Climatol 49:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Platnick S, King MD, Ackerman SA, Menzel WP, Baum BA, Riedi JC, Frey RA (2003) The MODIS cloud products: Algorithms and examples from Terra. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41:459–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Platnick S et al. (2015) MODIS atmosphere L3 daily product. NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, USA.  https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD08_D3.006
  42. Pruppacher HR, Klett JD (1978) Microphysics of clouds and precipitation. Reidel, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rahman SH, Sengupta D, Ravichandran M (2009) Variability of Indian summer monsoon rainfall in daily data from gauge and satellite. J Geophys Res 114:D17113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rajeevan M, Rohini P, Kumar KN, Srinivasan J, Unnikrishnan CK (2013) A study of vertical cloud structure of the Indian summer monsoon using CloudSat data. Clim Dyn 40:637–650.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1374-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ramanathan V (1987) The role of earth radiation budget studies in climate and general circulation research. J Geophys Res 92:4075–4095.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD04p04075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramanathan V, Cess RD, Harrison EF, Minnis P, Barkstrom BR, Ahmad E, Hartmann D (1989) Cloud-radiative forcing and climate: results from the earth radiation budget experiment. Science 243(4887): 57–63.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.243.4887.57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ramu DA, Sabeerali CT, Chattopadhyay R, Rao DN, George G, Dhakate AR, Salunke K, Srivastava A, Rao SA (2016) Indian summer monsoon rainfall simulation and prediction skill in the CFSv2 coupled model: impact of atmospheric horizontal resolution. J Geophys Res 121:2205–2221Google Scholar
  48. Randall DA et al (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S et al (ed) Contributions of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Rasmusson EM, Carpenter TH (1983) The relationship between the eastern Pacific seas surface temperature and rainfall over India and Sri Lanka. Mon Weather Rev 111:354–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reynolds RW, Smith TM, Liu C, Chelton DB, Casey KS, Schlax MG (2007) Daily high-resolution blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J Clim 20:5473–5496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rossow WB, Schiffer RA (1991) ISCCP cloud data products. Bull Am Meteor Soc 72:2–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rossow WB, Schiffer RA (1999) Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP. Bull Am Meteor Soc 80:2261–2287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rotstayn LD, Ryan BF, Katzfey JJ (2000) A scheme for the calculation of the liquid fraction of mixed-phase stratiform clouds in large scale models. Mon Weather Rev 128:1070–1088. 10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<1070:ASFCOT>2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sabeerali CT, Rao SA, Dhakate AR, Salunke K, Goswami BN (2014) Why ensemble mean projection of south Asian monsoon rainfall by CMIP5 models is not reliable? Clim Dyn 45:161–174.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2269-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saha S, Moorthi S, Wu X, Wang J, Nadiga S, Tripp P, Behringer D, Hou Y, Chuang H, Iredell M, Ek M, Meng J, Yang R, Mendez MP, van den Dool H, Zhang Q, Wang W, Chen M, Becker E (2014) The NCEP climate forecast system version 2. J Clim 27:2185–2208.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00823.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Saji NH, Goswami BN, Vinayachandran PN, Yamagata T (1999) A dipole mode in the tropical Indian Ocean. Nature 401:360–363Google Scholar
  57. Schmidt GA, Kelley M, Nazarenko L, Ruedy R, Russell GL, Aleinov I, Bauer M, Bauer SE, Bhat MK, Bleck R, Canuto V, Chen Y-H, Cheng Y, Clune TL, Del Genio A, de Fainchtein R, Faluvegi G, Hansen JE, Healy RJ, Kiang NY, Koch D, Lacis AA, LeGrande AN, Lerner J, Lo KK, Matthews EE, Menon S, Miller RL, Oinas V, Oloso AO, Perlwitz JP, Puma MJ, Putman WM, Rind D, Romanou A, Sato M, Shindell DT, Sun S, Syed RA, Tausnev N, Tsigaridis K, Unger N, Voulgarakis A, Yao M-S, Zhang J (2014) Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2 contributions to the CMIP5 archive. J Adv Model Earth Syst 6(1):141–184.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shimpo A, Kanamitsu M, Iacobellis S, Hong S-Y (2008) Comparison of four cloud schemes in simulating the seasonal mean field forced by the observed sea surface temperature. Mon Weather Rev 136:2557–2575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Slingo JM (1980) A cloud parameterization scheme derived from GATE data for use with a numerical model. Q J R Meteorol Soc 106:747–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Slingo JM (1987) The development and verification of a cloud predicition scheme for the ECMWF model. Q J R Meteorol Soc 113:899–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Slingo A, Slingo JM (1991) Response of the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model to improvements in the representation of clouds. J Geophys Res 96:341–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sperber KR, Annamalai H, Kang IS, Kitoh A, Moise A, Turner A, Wang B, Zhou T (2012) The Asian summer monsoon: an intercomparison of CMIP5 vs. CMIP3 simulations of the late 20th century. Clim Dyn 41:2711–2744.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1607-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stefanova L, Misra V, Chan S, Griffin M, O’Brien JJ, Smith III TJ (2012) A proxy for high-resolution regional analysis for the Southeast United States: assessment of precipitation variability in dynamically downscaled reanalyses. Clim Dyn 38:2449–2466.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1230-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stephens GL (2005) Cloud feebacks in the climate system: a critical review. J Clim 18:237–273.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3243.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Su H, Jiang JH, Teixeira J, Gettelman A, Huang X, Stephens G, Vane D, Perun VS (2011) Comparison of regime-sorted tropical cloud profiles observed by CloudSat with GEOS5 analyses and two general circulation model simulations. J Geophys Res 116:D09104.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014971 Google Scholar
  66. Tan I, Storelvmo T, Zelinka MD (2016) Observational constraints on mixed-phase clouds imply higher climate sensivity. Science 353:224–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tremblay A, Glazer A (2000) An improved modeling scheme for freezing precipitation forecasts. Mon Weather Rev 128:1289–1308. 10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<1289:AIMSFF>2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Waliser DE, Jin K, Kang IS, Stern WF, Schubert SD, Wu MLC, Lau KM, Lee MI, Krishnamurthy V, Kitoh A, Meehl GA, Galin VY, Satyan V, Mandke SK, Wu G, Liu Y, Park CK (2003) AGCM simulation of intraseasonal variability associated with the Asian summer monsoon. Clim Dyn.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0337-1 Google Scholar
  69. Waliser DE, Li JLF, Woods CP, Austin RT, Bacmeister J, Chern J, Del Genio A, Jiang JH, Kuang Z, Meng H, Minnis P, Platnick S, Rossow WB, Stephens GL, Sun-Mack S, Tao WK, Tompkins AM, Vane DG, Walker C, Wu D (2009) Cloud ice: a climate model challenge with signs and expectations of progress., J Geophys Res 114:D00A21.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Waliser DE, Li J-LF, L’Ecuyer TS, Chen WT (2011) The impact of precipitating ice and snow on the ration balance of global climate models. Geopys Res Lett 38:L06802.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046478 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wang T, Wong S, Fetzer EJ (2015) Cloud regime evolution in the Indian monsoon intraseasonal oscillation: connection to large-scale dynamical conditions and the atmospheric water budget. Geophys Res Lett 42:9465–9472.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weare BC (2004) A comparison of AMIP II model cloud layer properties with ISCCP D2 estimates. Clim Dyn 22:281–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Webster PJ, Magaña VO, Palmer TN, Shukla J, Tomas RA, Yanai M, Yasunari T (1998) Monsoons: processes, predictability, and the prospects for prediction. J Geophys Res 103:14451–14510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. WMO (1988) General meteorological standards and recommended practices, appendix A. Technical Regulations, WMO-No. 49. World Meteorological Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  75. WMO (2015a) Measurement of upper-air pressure, temperature and humidity (J. Nash). Instruments and Observing Methods Report No. 121. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  76. WMO (2015b) Recommended algorithms for the computation of marine metrological variables, I.6. JCOMM Technical Report No. 63. World Meteorological Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  77. Wood R, Field PR (2000) Relationships between total water, condensed water, and cloud fraction in stratiform clouds examined using aircraft data. J Atmos Sci 57:1888–1905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Xu K-M, Randall DA (1996) A semi-empirical cloudiness parameterization for use in climate models. J Atmos Sci 53:3084–3102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yau MK, Rogers RR (1989) A short course in cloud physics. In: Yau MK, Rogers RR (eds) Formation of cloud droplets, Ch. 6. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Ocean-Atmosphere Prediction Studies (COAPS)Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric ScienceFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations