Climate Dynamics

, Volume 51, Issue 9–10, pp 3467–3485 | Cite as

The response of land-falling tropical cyclone characteristics to projected climate change in northeast Australia

  • Chelsea L. ParkerEmail author
  • Cindy L. Bruyère
  • Priscilla A. Mooney
  • Amanda H. Lynch


Land-falling tropical cyclones along the Queensland coastline can result in serious and widespread damage. However, the effects of climate change on cyclone characteristics such as intensity, trajectory, rainfall, and especially translation speed and size are not well-understood. This study explores the relative change in the characteristics of three case studies by comparing the simulated tropical cyclones under current climate conditions with simulations of the same systems under future climate conditions. Simulations are performed with the Weather Research and Forecasting Model and environmental conditions for the future climate are obtained from the Community Earth System Model using a pseudo global warming technique. Results demonstrate a consistent response of increasing intensity through reduced central pressure (by up to 11 hPa), increased wind speeds (by 5–10% on average), and increased rainfall (by up to 27% for average hourly rainfall rates). The responses of other characteristics were variable and governed by either the location and trajectory of the current climate cyclone or the change in the steering flow. The cyclone that traveled furthest poleward encountered a larger climate perturbation, resulting in a larger proportional increase in size, rainfall rate, and wind speeds. The projected monthly average change in the 500 mb winds with climate change governed the alteration in the both the trajectory and translation speed for each case. The simulated changes have serious implications for damage to coastal settlements, infrastructure, and ecosystems through increased wind speeds, storm surge, rainfall, and potentially increased size of some systems.


Australia Tropical cyclones Climate change Weather research and forecasting model Pseudo global warming technique 



The authors would like to thank James Done, and Greg Holland at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) for very helpful discussion of the results; Noel Davidson at the Australian Bureau of Meteorology for the high-resolution ACCESS initialization data and advice; and Daniel P. Moriarty III at the NASA Goddard Spaceflight Center for assistance in editing the manuscript. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewer for their helpful insights, suggestions, and contributions that were instrumental for improving this study and paper. Computational work was supported by NCAR and the Yellowstone supercomputing facilities. This work was funded by Brown University and in part by NCAR summer visitor program. NCAR is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.


  1. Abbs D (2012) The impact of climate change on the climatology of tropical cyclones in the Australian region. CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship Working paper No. 11Google Scholar
  2. Alexander LV, Hope P, Collins D, Trewin B, Lynch A, Nicholls N (2007) Trends in Australia’s climate means and extremes: a global context. Aust Meteorol Mag 56(1):1–18Google Scholar
  3. Allen MR, Ingram WJ (2002) Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. Nature 419(6903):224–232Google Scholar
  4. Allen JT, Tippett MK, Sobel AH, Lepore C (2016) Understanding the drivers of variability in severe convection: bringing together the scientific and insurance communities. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 97(11):ES221–ES223Google Scholar
  5. Anderson-Berry LJ (2003) Community vulnerability to tropical cyclones: Cairns, 1996–2000. Nat Hazards 30(2):209–232Google Scholar
  6. Anthony KR, Fabricius KE (2000) Shifting roles of heterotrophy and autotrophy in coral energetics under varying turbidity. J Exp Marine Biol Ecol 252(2):221–253Google Scholar
  7. AON Benfield (2014) April 2014 global catastrophe recap. Accessed 31 Oct 2016
  8. Australian Government, Bureau of Meteorology (2015) Severe tropical cyclone Marcia. Accessed Jan 31 2017
  9. Authority, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (2015) Marine Monitoring Program results for 2013–2014: summary reportGoogle Scholar
  10. Authority, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (2016) Marine Monitoring Program summary report: results for 2014–2015Google Scholar
  11. Beeden R, Maynard J, Puotinen M, Marshall P, Dryden J, Goldberg J et al (2015) Impacts and recovery from severe tropical cyclone Yasi on the great barrier reef. PLoS One 10(4):e0121272. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bell R, Strachan J, Vidale PL, Hodges K, Roberts M (2013) Response of tropical cyclones to idealized climate change experiments in a global high-resolution coupled general circulation model. J Clim 26(20):7966–7980Google Scholar
  13. Bender MA, Knutson TR, Tuleya RE, Sirutis JJ, Vecchi GA, Garner ST, Held IM (2010) Modeled impact of anthropogenic warming on the frequency of intense Atlantic hurricanes. Science 327(5964):454–458Google Scholar
  14. Bengtsson L, Hodges KI, Esch M, Keenlyside N, Kornblueh L, Luo JJ, Yamagata T (2007) How may tropical cyclones change in a warmer climate? Tellus A 59(4):539–561Google Scholar
  15. Brodie J, Schroeder T, Rohde K, Faithful J, Masters B, Dekker A, Maughan M (2010) Dispersal of suspended sediments and nutrients in the Great Barrier Reef lagoon during river-discharge events: conclusions from satellite remote sensing and concurrent flood-plume sampling. Marine Freshw Res 61(6):651–664Google Scholar
  16. Brodie JE, Kroon FJ, Schaffelke B, Wolanski EC, Lewis SE, Devlin MJ et al (2012) Terrestrial pollutant runoff to the Great Barrier Reef: an update of issues, priorities and management responses. Mar Pollut Bull 65(4):81–100Google Scholar
  17. Bruyère CL, Done JM, Holland GJ, Fredrick S (2014) Bias corrections of global models for regional climate simulations of high-impact weather. Clim Dyn 43(7–8):1847–1856Google Scholar
  18. Carroll F, Authority QR (2015) Building it back better to reduce risks after multiple disaster events. In: Queensland Reconstruction Authority, Queensland, presented to the Floodplain Management Association National ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  19. Ceccarelli DM, Emslie MJ, Richards ZT (2016) Post-disturbance stability of fish assemblages measured at coarse taxonomic resolution masks change at finer scales. PLoS One 11(6):e0156232. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chand SS, McBride LJ, Tory KJ, Wheeler MC, Walsh KJ (2013) Impact of different ENSO regimes on southwest Pacific tropical cyclones. J Clim 26(2):600–608Google Scholar
  21. Chen F, Dudhia J (2001) Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: model implementation and sensitivity. Mon Weather Rev 129(4):569–585Google Scholar
  22. Chen M, Huang XY (2006) Digital filter initialization for MM5. Mon Weather Rev 134(4):1222–1236Google Scholar
  23. Collins M, An SI, Cai W, Ganachaud A, Guilyardi E, Jin FF, et al (2010) The impact of global warming on the tropical Pacific Ocean and El Niño. Nat Geosci 3(6):391–397Google Scholar
  24. Czajkowski J, Done J (2014) As the wind blows? Understanding hurricane damages at the local level through a case study analysis. Weather Clim Soc 6(2):202–217Google Scholar
  25. Dai A, Rasmussen RM, Ikeda K, Liu C (2017) A new approach to construct representative future forcing data for dynamic downscaling. Clim Dyn. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Davidson NE, Xiao Y, Ma Y, Weber HC, Sun X, Rikus LJ, Fraser J et al (2014) ACCESS-TC: Vortex specification, 4DVAR initialization, verification, and structure diagnostics. Mon Weather Rev 142(3):1265–1289Google Scholar
  27. Davies PL, Eyre BD (2005) Estuarine modification of nutrient and sediment exports to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park from the Daintree and Annan River catchments. Mar Pollut Bull 51(1):174–185Google Scholar
  28. De’ath G, Fabricius KE, Sweatman H, Puotinen M (2012) The 27-year decline of coral cover on the Great Barrier Reef and its causes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(44):17995–17999Google Scholar
  29. Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, Bechtold P, et al. (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 137(656):553–597Google Scholar
  30. Devlin MJ, Brodie J (2005) Terrestrial discharge into the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: nutrient behavior in coastal waters. Mar Pollut Bull 51(1):9–22Google Scholar
  31. Devlin M, Schaffelke B (2009) Spatial extent of riverine flood plumes and exposure of marine ecosystems in the Tully coastal region, Great Barrier Reef. Mar Freshw Res 60(11):1109–1122Google Scholar
  32. Diamond HJ, Lorrey AM, Renwick JA (2013) A southwest Pacific tropical cyclone climatology and linkages to the El Niño–Southern Oscillation. J Clim 26(1):3–25Google Scholar
  33. Done TJ (1992) Effects of tropical cyclone waves on ecological and geomorphological structures on the Great Barrier Reef. Cont Shelf Res 12(7):859–872Google Scholar
  34. Done JM, Holland GJ, Bruyère CL, Leung LR, Suzuki-Parker A (2013) Modeling high-impact weather and climate: Lessons from a tropical cyclone perspective. Clim Change. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Done JM, Ge M, Holland GJ, Bruyère CL (2014) Future changes in Gulf of Mexico hurricane wave climatology. In: Offshore technology conference. Offshore Technology ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  36. Done JM, Holland GJ, Bruyère CL, Leung LR, Suzuki-Parker A (2015) Modeling high-impact weather and climate: lessons from a tropical cyclone perspective. Clim Change 129(3–4):381–395Google Scholar
  37. Dowdy AJ (2014) Long-term changes in Australian tropical cyclone numbers. Atmos Sci Lett 15(4):292–298Google Scholar
  38. Ek MB, Mitchell KE, Lin Y, Rogers E, Grunmann P, Koren V et al (2003) Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model. J Geophys Res Atmos (1984–2012) 108:D22Google Scholar
  39. Elsner JB, Kara AB (1999) Hurricanes of the North Atlantic: Climate and Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK Google Scholar
  40. Emanuel KA (1987) The dependence of hurricane intensity on climate. Nature 326(6112):483–485Google Scholar
  41. Emanuel K (2005) Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature 436(7051):686–688Google Scholar
  42. Emanuel K (2006) Climate and tropical cyclone activity: a new model downscaling approach. J Clim 19(19):4797–4802Google Scholar
  43. Emanuel K, Sundararajan R, Williams J (2008) Hurricanes and global warming: results from downscaling IPCC AR4 simulations. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 89(3):347Google Scholar
  44. Fabricius KE, Wolanski E (2000) Rapid smothering of coral reef organisms by muddy marine snow. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 50(1), 115–120Google Scholar
  45. Fabricius KE, De’Ath G, Puotinen ML, Done T, Cooper TF, Burgess SC (2008) Disturbance gradients on inshore and offshore coral reefs caused by a severe tropical cyclone. Limnol Oceanogr 53(2):690–704Google Scholar
  46. Ferrier BS (1994) A double-moment multiple-phase four-class bulk ice scheme. Part I: description. J Atmos Sci 51(2):249–280Google Scholar
  47. Ferrier BS, Jin Y, Lin Y, Black T, Rogers E, DiMego G (2002) Implementation of a new grid-scale cloud and rainfall scheme in the NCEP Eta Model. In: Preprints, 15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, San Antonio, TX, American Meteorological Society, pp 280–283Google Scholar
  48. Fraser RH, Currie DJ (1996) The species richness-energy hypothesis in a system where historical factors are thought to prevail: coral reefs. The Am Nat 148(1):138–159Google Scholar
  49. Furnas M, Mitchell A, Skuza M, Brodie J (2005) In the other 90%: phytoplankton responses to enhanced nutrient availability in the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon. Mar Pollut Bull 51(1):253–265Google Scholar
  50. Gall RJ, Franklin J, Marks F, Rappaport EN, Toepfer F (2013) The hurricane forecast improvement project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:329–334Google Scholar
  51. Garner ST, Held IM, Knutson T, Sirutis J (2009) The roles of wind shear and thermal stratification in past and projected changes of Atlantic tropical cyclone activity. J Clim 22(17):4723–4734Google Scholar
  52. Gentry MS, Lackmann GM (2010) Sensitivity of simulated tropical cyclone structure and intensity to horizontal resolution. Mon Weather Rev 138(3):688–704Google Scholar
  53. Ginger JD, Henderson DJ, Leitch CJ, Boughton GN (2007) Tropical Cyclone Larry: estimation of wind field and assessment of building damage. Aust J Struct Eng 7(3):209–224Google Scholar
  54. Hara M, Yoshikane T, Kawase H, Kimura F (2008) Estimation of the impact of global warming on snow depth in Japan by the pseudo-global-warming method. Hydrol Res Lett 2:61–64Google Scholar
  55. Held IM, Soden BJ (2006) Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Clim 19(21):5686–5699Google Scholar
  56. Hill KA, Lackmann GM (2009) Influence of environmental humidity on tropical cyclone size. Mon Weather Rev 137(10):3294–3315Google Scholar
  57. Hill KA, Lackmann GM (2011) The impact of future climate change on TC intensity and structure: a downscaling approach. J Clim 24(17):4644–4661Google Scholar
  58. Holland GJ (1983) Tropical cyclone motion: Environmental interaction plus a beta effect. J Atmos Sci 40(2):328–342Google Scholar
  59. Holland G, Bruyère CL (2014) Recent intense hurricane response to global climate change. Clim Dyn 42:617–617. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hong SY, Noh Y, Dudhia J (2006) A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon Weather Rev 134(9):2318–2341Google Scholar
  61. Hughes TP, Day JC, Brodie J (2015) Securing the future of the Great Barrier Reef. Nat Clim Change 5(6):508–511Google Scholar
  62. Iacono MJ, Delamere JS, Mlawer EJ, Shephard MW, Clough SA, Collins WD (2008) Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. J Geophys Res 113:D13103. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Irish JL, Resio DT (2010) A hydrodynamics-based surge scale for hurricanes. Ocean Eng 37(1):69–81Google Scholar
  64. Kain JS (1993) Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: the Kain Fritsch scheme. Represent Cumulus Convect Numer Models Meteorol Monogr 46:165–170Google Scholar
  65. Kain JS (2004) The Kain–Fritsch convective parameterization: an update. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 43:170–181Google Scholar
  66. Kain JS, Fritsch JM (1990) A one-dimensional entraining detraining plume model and its application in convective parameterization. J Atmos Sci 47:2784–2802Google Scholar
  67. Kawase, Yoshikane T, Hara M, Kimura F, Yasunari T, Ailikun B, Ueda H, Inoue T (2009) Intermodel variability of future changes in the Baiu rainband estimated by the pseudo global warming downscaling method J Geophys Res 114:D24110.
  68. Knaff JA, Longmore SP, Molenar DA (2014) An objective satellite-based tropical cyclone size climatology. J Clim 27(1):455–476Google Scholar
  69. Knapp KR, Kruk MC, Levinson DH, Diamond HJ, Neumann CJ (2010) The international best track archive for climate stewardship (IBTrACS) unifying tropical cyclone data. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91(3):363–376Google Scholar
  70. Knutson TR, Tuleya RE (2004) Impact of CO2-induced warming on simulated hurricane intensity and precipitation: sensitivity to the choice of climate model and convective parameterization. J Clim 17(18):3477–3495Google Scholar
  71. Knutson TR, McBride JL, Chan J, Emanuel K, Holland G, Landsea C et al (2010) Tropical cyclones and climate change. Nat Geosci 3(3):157–163Google Scholar
  72. Knutti R, Masson D, Gettelman A (2013) Climate model genealogy: generation CMIP5 and how we got there. Geophys Res Lett 40(6):1194–1199Google Scholar
  73. Kuleshov Y, Fawcett R, Qi L, Trewin B, Jones D, McBride J, Ramsay H (2010) Trends in tropical cyclones in the South Indian Ocean and the South Pacific Ocean. J Geophys Res 115:D01101.
  74. Kurihara Y, Bender MA, Ross RJ (1993) An initialization scheme of hurricane models by vortex specification. Mon Weather Rev 121:2030–2045Google Scholar
  75. Lackmann GM (2015) Hurricane Sandy before 1900 and after 2100. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 96(4):547–560Google Scholar
  76. Landsea CW, Vecchi GA, Bengtsson L, Knutson TR (2010) Impact of duration thresholds on Atlantic tropical cyclone counts. J Clim 23(10):2508–2519Google Scholar
  77. Laurance WF, Curran TJ (2008) Impacts of wind disturbance on fragmented tropical forests: a review and synthesis. Aust Ecol 33(4):399–408Google Scholar
  78. Lavender SL, Walsh KJE (2011) Dynamically downscaled simulations of Australian region tropical cyclones in current and future climates. Geophys Res Lett 38:L10705. Google Scholar
  79. Leslie LM, Holland GJ (1995) On the bogussing of tropical cyclones in numerical models: a comparison of vortex profiles. Meteorol Atmos Phys 56:101–110Google Scholar
  80. Leslie LM, Karoly DJ, Leplastrier M, Buckley BW (2007) Variability of tropical cyclones over the southwest Pacific Ocean using a high-resolution climate model. Meteorol Atmos Phys 97(1–4):171–180Google Scholar
  81. Lynch P, Huang XY (1992) Initialization of the HIRLAM model using a digital filter. Mon Weather Rev 120(6):1019–1034Google Scholar
  82. Lynch P, Huang XY (1994) Diabatic initialization using recursive filters. Tellus A 46(5):583–597Google Scholar
  83. Lynn BH, Healy R, Druyan LM (2009) Investigation of Hurricane Katrina characteristics for future, warmer climates. Clim Res 39(1):75–86Google Scholar
  84. Marks FD, Shay LK (1998) Landfalling tropical cyclones: Forecast problems and associated research opportunities. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79(2):305–323Google Scholar
  85. Massel SR, Done TJ (1993) Effects of cyclone waves on massive coral assemblages on the Great Barrier Reef: meteorology, hydrodynamics and demography. Coral Reefs 12(3–4):153–166Google Scholar
  86. McInnes KL, Hubbert GD, Abbs DJ, Oliver SE (2002) A numerical modelling study of coastal flooding. Meteorol Atmos Phys 80(1–4):217–233Google Scholar
  87. McInnes KL, Walsh KJE, Hubbert GD, Beer T (2003) Impact of sea-level rise and storm surges on a coastal community. Nat Hazards 30(2):187–207Google Scholar
  88. Merrill RT (1984) A comparison of large and small tropical cyclones. Mon Weather Rev 112(7):1408–1418Google Scholar
  89. Mitchell C, Brodie J, White I (2005) Sediments, nutrients and pesticide residues in event flow conditions in streams of the Mackay Whitsunday Region, Australia. Mar Pollut Bull 51(1):23–36Google Scholar
  90. Monaghan AJ, Steinhoff DF, Bruyere CL, Yates D (2014) NCAR CESM global bias-corrected CMIP5 output to support WRF/MPAS research. In: Research data archive at the national center for atmospheric research, computational and information systems laboratory. Accessed Feb 2016
  91. Monin AS, Obukhov A (1954) Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere. Contrib Geophys Inst Acad Sci USSR 151:163–187Google Scholar
  92. Nguyen KC, Walsh KJE (2001) Interannual, decadal, and transient greenhouse simulation of tropical cyclone—like vortices in a regional climate model of the South Pacific. J Clim 14(13):3043–3054Google Scholar
  93. Nuissier O, Rogers RF, Roux F (2005) A numerical simulation of Hurricane Bret on 22–23 August 1999 initialized with airborne Doppler radar and dropsonde data. Q J R Meteorol Soc 131:155–194Google Scholar
  94. Oouchi K, Yoshimura J, Yoshimura H, Mizuta R, Kusunoki S, Akira NODA (2006) Tropical cyclone climatology in a global-warming climate as simulated in a 20 km-mesh global atmospheric model: frequency and wind intensity analyses. J Meteorol Soc Jpn Ser II 84(2):259–276Google Scholar
  95. Pall P, Allen MR, Stone DA (2007) Testing the Clausius–Clapeyron constraint on changes in extreme precipitation under CO2 warming. Clim Dyn 28(4):351–363Google Scholar
  96. Parker CL, Lynch AH, Spera SA, Spangler KR (2017a) The Relationship between tropical cyclone activity, nutrient loading, and algal blooms over the Great Barrier Reef. Biogeosci Discuss (in review)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Parker CL, Lynch AH, Mooney PA (2017b) Factors affecting the trajectory and intensification of tropical cyclone yasi (2011). Atmos Res. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Peng M, Xie L, Pietrafesa LJ (2004) A numerical study of storm surge and inundation in the Croatan–Albemarle–Pamlico Estuary system. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 59(1), 121–137Google Scholar
  99. Powell MD, Reinhold TA (2007) Tropical cyclone destructive potential by integrated kinetic energy. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88(4):513Google Scholar
  100. Preen AR, Long WL, Coles RG (1995) Flood and cyclone related loss, and partial recovery, of more than 1000 km 2 of seagrass in Hervey Bay, Queensland, Australia. Aquat Bot 52(1):3–17Google Scholar
  101. Puotinen ML (2007) Modelling the risk of cyclone wave damage to coral reefs using GIS: a case study of the Great Barrier Reef, 1969–2003. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 21(1):97–120Google Scholar
  102. Puotinen ML, Done TJ, Skelly WC (1997) An atlas of tropical cyclones in the Great Barrier Reef region: 1969–1997. CRC Reef Research, Technical Report pp 1–192Google Scholar
  103. Queensland Government (2012) Budget strategy and outloook 2011–2012, 70 pp. Accessed 5 Jan 2015
  104. Puri K, Xiao Y, Sun X, Lee J, Engel C, Steinle P, Sun Z et al (2010) Preliminary results from Numerical Weather Prediction implementation of ACCESS. CAWCR Res Let 5:15–22Google Scholar
  105. Puri K, Dietachmayer G, Steinle P, Dix M, Rikus L, Logan L, Bermous I et al (2013) Implementation of the initial ACCESS numerical weather prediction system. Aust Meteorol Oceanogr J 63:265–284Google Scholar
  106. Rasmussen R, Liu C, Ikeda K, Gochis D, Yates D, Chen F et al (2011) High-resolution coupled climate runoff simulations of seasonal snowfall over Colorado: a process study of current and warmer climate. J Clim 24(12):3015–3048Google Scholar
  107. Rego JL, Li C (2009) On the importance of the forward speed of hurricanes in storm surge forecasting: A numerical study. Geophys Res Lett 36:L07609. Google Scholar
  108. Rennó NO, Ingersoll AP (1996) Natural convection as a heat engine: a theory for CAPE. J Atmos Sci 53(4):572–585Google Scholar
  109. Reuters (2015) Cyclone Yasi to cost insurers AUS $3.5 bln forecaster. Accessed Apr 2016
  110. Riahi K, Rao S, Krey V, Cho C, Chirkov V, Fischer G, … Rafaj P (2011) RCP 8.5—a scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Clim Change 109(1–2):33–57Google Scholar
  111. Riemann-Campe K, Fraedrich K, Lunkeit F (2009) Global climatology of convective available potential energy (CAPE) and convective inhibition (CIN) in ERA-40 reanalysis. Atmos Res 93(1):534–545Google Scholar
  112. Rogers R, Aberson S, Black M, Black P, Cione J, Dodge P, Uhlhorn E et al (2006) The intensity forecasting experiment: A NOAA multiyear field program for improving tropical cyclone intensity forecasts. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87(11):1523–1537Google Scholar
  113. Rogers RF et al (2013) NOAA’s hurricane intensity forecasting experiment: a progress report. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:859–882Google Scholar
  114. Schär C, Frei C, Lüthi D, Davies HC (1996) Surrogate climate-change scenarios for regional climate models. Geophys Res Lett 23(6):669–672Google Scholar
  115. Shapiro LJ (1983) The asymmetric boundary layer flow under a translating hurricane. J Atmos Sci 40(8):1984–1998Google Scholar
  116. Sillmann J, Kharin VV, Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Bronaugh D (2013) Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate. J Geophys Res Atmos 118(4):1716–1733Google Scholar
  117. Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM (2005) Coauthors, 2008: a description of the Advanced Research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-475 + STR, p 113Google Scholar
  118. Stewart MG (2003) Cyclone damage and temporal changes to building vulnerability and economic risks for residential construction. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 91(5):671–691Google Scholar
  119. Stieglitz T (2005) Submarine groundwater discharge into the near-shore zone of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Mar Pollut Bull 51(1):51–59Google Scholar
  120. Sugi M, Yoshimura J (2012) Decreasing trend of tropical cyclone frequency in 228-year highresolution AGCM simulations. Geophys Res Lett 39:L19805. Google Scholar
  121. Sugi M, Murakami H, Yoshimura J (2009) A reduction in global tropical cyclone frequency due to global warming. Sola 5:164–167Google Scholar
  122. Tewari M, Chen F, Wang W, Dudhia J, LeMone MA, Mitchell K et al (2004) Implementation and verification of the unified NOAH land surface model in the WRF model. In: 20th conference on weather analysis and forecasting/16th conference on numerical weather prediction, pp 11–15Google Scholar
  123. Trenberth K (2005) Uncertainty in hurricanes and global warming. Science 308(5729):1753–1754Google Scholar
  124. Trenberth KE, Fasullo J, Smith L (2005) Trends and variability in column-integrated atmospheric water vapor. Clim Dyn 24(7–8):741–758Google Scholar
  125. Turton SM (2008) Landscape-scale impacts of Cyclone Larry on the forests of northeast Australia, including comparisons with previous cyclones impacting the region between 1858 and 2006. Austral Ecol 33(4):409–416Google Scholar
  126. Ueno M (1989) Operational bogussing and numerical predication in JMA. JMA/NPD Tech Rep 28:48Google Scholar
  127. Vecchi GA, Soden BJ (2007) Effect of remote sea surface temperature change on tropical cyclone potential intensity. Nature 450(7172):1066–1070Google Scholar
  128. Velden CS, Leslie LM (1991) The basic relationship between tropical cyclone intensity and the depth of the environmental steering layer in the Australian region. Weather Forecast 6(2):244–253Google Scholar
  129. Walsh K (2004) Tropical cyclones and climate change: unresolved issues. Climate Res 27(1):77–83Google Scholar
  130. Walsh K (2015) Fine resolution simulations of the effect of climate change on tropical cyclones in the South Pacific. Clim Dyn 45(9–10):2619–2631Google Scholar
  131. Walsh KJ, Katzfey JJ (2000) The impact of climate change on the poleward movement of tropical cyclone–like vortices in a regional climate model. J Clim 13(6):1116–1132Google Scholar
  132. Walsh KJ, Ryan BF (2000) Tropical cyclone intensity increase near Australia as a result of climate change. J Clim 13(16):3029–3036Google Scholar
  133. Walsh KJE, Nguyen KC, McGregor JL (2004) Fine-resolution regional climate model simulations of the impact of climate change on tropical cyclones near Australia. Clim Dyn 22(1):47–56Google Scholar
  134. Walsh KJ, McInnes KL, McBride JL (2012) Climate change impacts on tropical cyclones and extreme sea levels in the South Pacific—a regional assessment. Global Planet Change 80:149–164Google Scholar
  135. Walsh KJ, McBride JL, Klotzbach PJ, Balachandran S, Camargo SJ, Holland G et al (2016) Tropical cyclones and climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 7(1):65–89Google Scholar
  136. Wang G, Wang D, Trenberth KE, Erfanian A, Yu M, Bosilovich MG, Parr DT (2017) The peak structure and future changes of the relationships between extreme precipitation and temperature. Nat Clim Change 7:268–274Google Scholar
  137. Weisberg RH, Zheng L (2006) Hurricane storm surge simulations for Tampa Bay. Estuar Coast 29(6):899–913Google Scholar
  138. Yamada Y, Oouchi K, Satoh M, Tomita H, Yanase W (2010) Projection of changes in tropical cyclone activity and cloud height due to greenhouse warming: Global cloud-system-resolving approach. Geophys Res Lett 37:L07709. Google Scholar
  139. Yoshikane T, Kimura F, Kawase H, Nozawa T (2012) Verification of the performance of the pseudo-global-warming method for future climate changes during June in East Asia. SOLA 8(0):133–136Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary SciencesBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  2. 2.Institute at Brown for Environment and SocietyBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  3. 3.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA
  4. 4.Environmental Sciences and ManagementNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroomSouth Africa
  5. 5.Uni Research ClimateBjerknes Centre for Climate ResearchBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations