Observed warming over northern South America has an anthropogenic origin

  • Armineh Barkhordarian
  • Hans von Storch
  • Eduardo Zorita
  • Paul C. Loikith
  • Carlos R. Mechoso
Article

Abstract

We investigate whether the recently observed trends in daily maximum and minimum near-surface air temperature (Tmax and Tmin, respectively) over South America (SA) are consistent with the simulated response of Tmin and Tmax to anthropogenic forcing. Results indicate that the recently observed warming in the dry seasons is well beyond the range of natural (internal) variability. In the wet season the natural modes of variability explain a substantial portion of Tmin and Tmax variability. We demonstrate that the large-scale component of greenhouse gas (GHG) forcing is detectable in dry-seasonal warming. However, none of the global and regional climate change projections reproduce the observed warming of up to 0.6 K/Decade in Tmax in 1983–2012 over northern SA during the austral spring (SON). Thus, besides the global manifestation of GHG forcing, other external drivers have an imprint. Using aerosols-only forcing simulations, our results provide evidence that anthropogenic aerosols also have a detectable influence in SON and that the indirect effect of aerosols on cloud’s lifetime is more compatible with the observed record. In addition, there is an increasing trend in the observed incoming solar radiation over northern SA in SON, which is larger than expected from natural (internal) variability alone. We further show that in the dry seasons the spread of projected trends based on the RCP4.5 scenario derived from 30 CMIP5 models encompasses the observed area-averaged trends in Tmin and Tmax. This may imply that the observed excessive warming in the dry seasons serve as an illustration of plausible future expected change in the region.

Supplementary material

382_2017_3988_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 3065 KB)

References

  1. Archer-Nicholls S, Lowe D, Schultz DM, McFiggans G (2016) Aerosol–radiation–cloud interactions in a regional coupled model: the effects of convective parameterization and resolution. Atmos Chem Phys 16:5573–5594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artaxo et al (2013) Atmospheric aerosols in Amazonia and land use change: from natural biogenic to biomass burning conditions. Faraday Discuss 165:203–235. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3FD00052D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barkhordarian A, von Storch H, Zorita E (2012) Anthropogenic forcing is a plausible explanation for the observed surface specific humidity trends over the Mediterranean area. Geophys Res Lett 39:L19706. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barkhordarian A, von Storch H, Bhend J (2013) The expectation of future precipitation change over the Mediterranean region is different from what we observe. Clim Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1497-7 Google Scholar
  5. Barkhordarian A, von Storch H, Zorita E, Gómez-Navarro J (2016) An attempt to deconstruct recent climate change over the Baltic Sea basin. J Geophys Res Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024648 Google Scholar
  6. Bhend J, von Storch H (2008) Consistency of observed winter precipitation trends in northern Europe with regional climate change projections. Clim Dyn 31:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blázquez J, Nestor-Nuñez M, Kusunoki S (2012) Climate projections and uncertainties over South America from MRI/JMA global model experiments. Atmos Clim Sci 2:381–400Google Scholar
  8. Bradley RS, Keimig FT, Diaz HF, Hardy DR (2009) Recent changes in freezing level heights in the tropics with implications for the deglacierization of high mountain regions. Geophys Res Lett 36:L17701. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037712 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braganza K, Karoly DJ, Arblaster JM (2004) Diurnal temperature range as an index of global climate change during the twentieth century. Geophys Res Lett 31:L13217. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019998 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chadwick R, Good P, Martin G, Rowell DP (2016) Large rainfall changes consistently projected over substantial areas of tropical land. Nat Clim Change 6:177–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2805 Google Scholar
  11. Cox et al (2000) Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408:184–187. https://doi.org/10.1038/35041539 (9 November 2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Barros Soares D, Lee H, Loikith PC, Barkhordarian A, Mechoso CR (2017) Can significant trends be detected in surface air temperature and precipitation over South America in recent decades? Int J Climatol 37:1483–1493. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4792 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Easterling DR, Peterson TC (1995) A new method for detecting undocumented discontinuities in climatological time-series. Int J Clim 15:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Exbrayat JF, Williams M (2015) Quantifying the net contribution of the historical Amazonian deforestation to climate change. Geophys Res Lett 42:2968–2976. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl063497 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Falvey M, Garreaud RD (2009) Regional cooling in a warming world: recent temperature trends in the southeast Pacific and along the west coast of subtropical South America (1979–2006). J Geophys Res 114:D04102. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forster P et al (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S et al (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution to working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–234Google Scholar
  17. Harris I, Jones PD, Osborn TJ, Lister DH (2014) Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations—the CRU TS3.10 dataset. Int J Climatol 34:623–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hodnebrog Ø. et al (2014) How shorter black carbon lifetime alters its climate effect. Nat Commun 5:5065. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 1535Google Scholar
  20. Jiménez-Muñoz JC, Sobrino JA, Mattar C, Malhi Y (2013) Spatial and temporal patterns of the recent warming of the Amazon forest. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:5204–5215. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50456 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones GS, Christidis N, Stott PA (2011) Detecting the influence of fossil fuel and bio-fuel black carbon aerosols on near surface temperature changes. Atmos Chem Phys 11:799–816. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-799-2011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knutson TR, Zeng F, Wittenberg AT (2013) Multimodel assessment of regional surface temperature trends: CMIP3 and CMIP5 twentieth-century simulations. J Clim 26:8709–8743. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00567.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar S, Allan RP, Zwiers F, Lawrence DM, Dirmeyer PA (2015), Revisiting trends in wetness and dryness in the presence of internal climate variability and water limitations over land. Geophys Res Lett 42:10,867–10,875. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066858 Google Scholar
  24. Lin JC, Matsui T, Pielke Sr RA, Kummerow C (2006) Effects of biomass-burning-derived aerosols on precipitation and clouds in the Amazon basin: a satellite-based empirical study. J Geophys Res 111:D19204. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006884 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lohmann U, Feichter J (2005) Global indirect aerosol effects: a review. Atmos Chem Phys 5:715–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loikith PC, Detzer J, Mechoso CR, Lee K, Barkhordarian A (2017) The influence of recurrent modes of climate variability on the occurrence of monthly temperature extremes over South America. J Geophys Res Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027561 Google Scholar
  27. Mantua NJ, Hare SR (2002) The Pacific decadal oscillation. J Oceanogr 58:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marengo JA (1992) Interannual variability of surface climate in the Amazon basin. J Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3370120808 Google Scholar
  29. Marengo JA, Chou SC, Kay G et al (2012) Development of regional future climate change scenarios in South America using the eta CPTEC/HadCM3 climate change projections: climatology and regional analyses for the Amazon, São Francisco and the Paraná river basins. Clim Dyn 38:1829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1155-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mariano GL, Mariano EVC, de Oliveira Am (2014) Aerosol optical depth over South America: the influence of biomass burning. In: Wang H (ed) Air pollution and pollutants. http://AcademyPublish.org, pp 74–89 (ISBN 978-1-941249-02-4)
  31. Meehl GA et al (2013) Climate change projections in CESM1(CAM5) compared to CCSM4. J Clim 26(17):6287–6308. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00572.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meinshausen M, Smith SJ, Calvin KV, Daniel JS, Kainuma MLT, Lamarque J-F, Matsumoto K, Montzka SA, Raper S. C. B., Riahi K, Thomson AM, Velders GJM, van Vuuren D (2011) The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extension from 1765 to 2300. Clim Change (special issue). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z Google Scholar
  33. Nuñez MN, Solman SA, Cabré MF (2009) Regional climate change experiments over Southern South America. II: climate change scenarios in the late twenty-first century. Clim Dyn 32(7–8):1081–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0449-8
  34. Posselt R, Mueller R, Stockli R, Trentmann J (2011) Spatial and temporal homogeneity of solar surface irradiance across satellite generations. Remote Sens 3:1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3051029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Procopio AS, Artaxo P, Kaufman YJ, Remer LA, Schafer JS, Holben BN (2004) Multiyear analysis of Amazonian biomass burning smoke radiative forcing of climate. Geophys Res Lett 31:L03108. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018646 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ramanathan V et al (2001) Aerosols, climate, and the hydrological cycle. Science 294:2119–2124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosário NE, Longo KM, Freitas SR, Yamasoe MA, Fonseca RM (2013) Modeling the South American regional smoke plume: aerosol optical depth variability and surface shortwave flux perturbation. Atmos Chem Phys 13:2923–2938. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2923-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sánchez E et al (2015) Regional climate modelling in CLARIS LPB: a concerted approach towards twenty first century projections of regional temperature and precipitation over South America. Clim Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2466-0 Google Scholar
  39. Schulz N, Bosier JP, Aceituno P (2012) Climate change along the arid coast of northern Chile. Int J Climatol 32(12):1803–1814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thompson DWJ, Wallace JM (2000) Annular modes in the extratropical circulation. Part I: month-to-month variability. J Clim 13:1000–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Urrutia R, Vuille M (2009) Climate change projections for the tropical Andes using a regional climate model: Temperature and precipitation simulations for the end of the 21st century. J Geophys Res 114:D02108. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van der Werf GR, Randerson JT, Giglio L, Collatz GJ, Mu M, Kasibhatla PS, Morton DC, DeFries RS, Jin Y, van Leeuwen TT (2010) Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009). Atmos Chem Phys 10:11707–11735. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vose RS, Easterling DR, Gleason B (2005) Maximum and minimum temperature trends for the globe: an update through 2004. Geophys Res Lett 32:L23822. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vuille M, Franquist E, Garreaud R, Lavado Casimiro WS, Cáceres B (2015) Impact of the global warming hiatus on Andean temperature. J Geophys Res Atmos 120:3745–3757. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic SciencesUniversity of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)Los AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA
  3. 3.Institute of Coastal ResearchHelmholtz-Zentrum GeesthachtGeesthachtGermany
  4. 4.Department of GeographyPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations