Alleviating tropical Atlantic sector biases in the Kiel climate model by enhancing horizontal and vertical atmosphere model resolution: climatology and interannual variability
- 209 Downloads
We investigate the quality of simulating tropical Atlantic (TA) sector climatology and interannual variability in integrations of the Kiel climate model (KCM) with varying atmosphere model resolution. The ocean model resolution is kept fixed. A reasonable simulation of TA sector annual-mean climate, seasonal cycle and interannual variability can only be achieved at sufficiently high horizontal and vertical atmospheric resolution. Two major reasons for the improvements are identified. First, the western equatorial Atlantic westerly surface wind bias in spring can be largely eliminated, which is explained by a better representation of meridional and especially vertical zonal momentum transport. The enhanced atmospheric circulation along the equator in turn greatly improves the thermal structure of the upper equatorial Atlantic with much reduced warm sea surface temperature (SST) biases. Second, the coastline in the southeastern TA and steep orography are better resolved at high resolution, which improves wind structure and in turn reduces warm SST biases in the Benguela upwelling region. The strongly diminished wind and SST biases at high atmosphere model resolution allow for a more realistic latitudinal position of the intertropical convergence zone. Resulting stronger cross-equatorial winds, in conjunction with a shallower thermocline, enable a rapid cold tongue development in the eastern TA in boreal spring. This enables simulation of realistic interannual SST variability and its seasonal phase locking in the KCM, which primarily is the result of a stronger thermocline feedback. Our findings suggest that enhanced atmospheric resolution, both vertical and horizontal, could be a key to achieving more realistic simulation of TA climatology and interannual variability in climate models.
KeywordsTropical Atlantic SST bias Benguela Climate modelling Resolution GCM biases
We thank two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments. This work was supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung grant SACUS (03G0837A) and EU FP7/2007–2013 under Grant agreement no. 603521, project PREFACE. Model integrations were performed at the Norddeutscher Verbund für Hoch- und Höchstleistungsrechnen and the Rechenzentrum der Universität Kiel.
- Krebs M, Biastoch A, Böning CW, Latif M (2017) Understanding Benguela upwelling system warm sea surface temperature bias in a forced ocean model.Google Scholar
- Madec G (2008) NEMO ocean engine. Note du Pole de modelisation, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL) No 27, FranceGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds RW (2009) What’s New in Version 2. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/Reynolds2009_oisst_daily_v02r00_version2-features.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2016
- Roeckner E, Baeuml G, Bonventura L et al (2003) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5. PART I: model description, report 349. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, HamburgGoogle Scholar
- Steinig S, Harlaß J, Latif M, Park W (2017) Influence of tropical model biases on Sahel rainfall in the Kiel Climate Model (in prep)Google Scholar
- Wentz FJ, Scott J, Hoffman R et al (2015) Remote Sensing Systems Cross-Calibrated Multi-Platform (CCMP) 6-hourly ocean vector wind analysis product on 0.25 deg grid, Version 2.0. Remote Sensing Systems, Santa Rosa, CAGoogle Scholar
- Xie S-P, Carton JA (2004) Tropical Atlantic variability: Patterns, mechanisms, and impacts. In: Wang C, Xie S-P, Carton JA (eds) Earth climate: the ocean-atmosphere interaction. Geophysical monograph. AGU, Washington, DC, pp 121–142Google Scholar
- Yu L, Jin X, Weller RA (2008) Multidecade global flux datasets from the objectively analyzed air-sea fluxes (OAFlux) project: latent and sensible heat fluxes, ocean evaporation, and related surface meteorological variables. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, OAFlux project technical report. OA-2008-01, pp 64. Woods Hole. MassachusettsGoogle Scholar