Advertisement

Climate Dynamics

, Volume 50, Issue 1–2, pp 403–422 | Cite as

On the dust load and rainfall relationship in South Asia: an analysis from CMIP5

Article

Abstract

This study is aimed at examining the consistency of the relationship between load of dust and rainfall simulated by different climate models and its implication for the Indian summer monsoon system. Monthly mean outputs of 12 climate models, obtained from the archive of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5) for the period 1951–2004, are analyzed to investigate the relationship between dust and rainfall. Comparative analysis of the model simulated precipitation with the India Meteorological Department (IMD) gridded rainfall, CRU TS3.21 and GPCP version 2.2 data sets show significant differences between the spatial patterns of JJAS rainfall as well as annual cycle of rainfall simulated by various models and observations. Similarly, significant inter-model differences are also noted in the simulation of load of dust, nevertheless it is further noted that most of the CMIP5 models are able to capture the major dust sources across the study region. Although the scatter plot analysis and the lead–lag pattern correlation between the dust load and the rainfall show strong relationship between the dust load over distant sources and the rainfall in the South Asian region in individual models, the temporal scale of this association indicates large differences amongst the models. Our results caution that it would be pre-mature to draw any robust conclusions on the time scale of the relationship between dust and the rainfall in the South Asian region based on either CMIP5 results or limited number of previous studies. Hence, we would like to emphasize upon the fact that any conclusions drawn on the relationship between the dust load and the South Asian rainfall using model simulation is highly dependent on the degree of complexity incorporated in those models such as the representation of aerosol life cycle, their interaction with clouds, precipitation and other components of the climate system.

Keywords

Load of dust CMIP5 Lead–lag Annual cycle Aerosol life cycle 

Notes

Acknowledgements

First author is thankful to Head MASD, Group Director ER&SSG and Director IIRS for providing the support to carry out the present research. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modeling groups for producing and making available their model output (listed in Table 1). We also acknowledged Giovanni TRMM Online Visualization and Analysis System (TOVAS) for making available the monthly global precipitation GPCP version 2.2 data set for the research purpose. We thank IMD for preparing the quality controlled daily rainfall data set and making it available for research purpose. The CRU TS3.21 data set has been procured from http://badc.nerc.ac.uk. TOMS aerosol index and GOCART dust optical depth have been obtained from http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/data-hldings/PIP/aerosol_index.html and http://acd-ext.gsfc.nasa.gov/People/Chin/gocartinfo.html respectively. We thank editor and anonymous reviewers for the comments on an earlier version of this manuscript which have helped us to bring out the manuscript in the present form.

Supplementary material

382_2017_3617_MOESM1_ESM.doc (2.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 2213 KB)

References

  1. Adler RF et al (2003) The version-2 global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979–Present). J Hydrometeorol 4:1147–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albrecht BA (1989) “Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness”. Science 245(4923):1227–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bollasina M, Nigam S (2009) Absorbing aerosols and pre-summer monsoon hydroclimate variability over the Indian subcontinent: the challenge in investigating links. Atmos Res 94(2):338–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollasina MA, Ming Y, Ramaswamy V (2011) Anthropogenic aerosols and the weakening of the South Asian summer monsoon. Science 14:502–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chin M et al (2002) Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and Sun photometer measurements. J Atmos Sci 59:461–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dash SK, Jenamani RK, Kalsi SR, Panda SK (2007) Some evidence of climate change in twentieth-century India. Clim Change 85:299–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dey S, Tripathi SN, Singh RP, Holben BN (2004) Influence of dust storms on the aerosol optical properties over the Indo-Gangetic basin. J Geophys Res 109:D20211. doi: 10.1029/2004JD004924 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donner LJ et al (2011) The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3. J Clim 24:3484–3519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dufresne J-L et al (2013) Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth system model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5. Clim Dyn 40:2123–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evan AT, Flamant C, Fiedler S, Doherty O (2014) An analysis of aeolian dust in climate models. Geophys Res Lett 41:5996–6001. doi: 10.1002/2014GL060545 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ganguly D, Jayaraman A, Gadhavi H (2005) In situ ship cruise measurements of mass concentration and size distribution of aerosols over Bay of Bengal and their radiative impacts. J Geophys Res 110:D06205. doi: 10.1029/2004JD005325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ganguly D, Rasch PJ, Wang H, Yoon J-H (2012a) Fast and slow responses of the South Asian monsoon system to anthropogenic aerosols. Geophys Res Lett 39:L18804. doi: 10.1029/2012GL053043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ganguly D, Rasch PJ, Wang H, Yoon J-H (2012b) Climate response of the South Asian monsoon system to anthropogenic aerosols. J Geophys Res 117:D13209. doi: 10.1029/2012JD017508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gautam R, Hsu NC, Lau KM, Kafatos M (2009) Aerosol and rainfall variability over the Indian monsoon region: distributions, trends and coupling. Ann Geophys 27:3691–3703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gent PR et al (2011) The community climate system model version 4. J Clim 24:4973–4991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ginoux P et al (2001) Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART model. J Geophys Res D 106(17):20255–20273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ginoux P, Prospero JM, Gill TE, Hsu NC, Zhao M (2012) Global-scale attribution of anthropogenic and natural dust sources and their emission rates based on MODIS Deep Blue aerosol products. Rev Geophys 50:RG3005. doi: 10.1029/2012RG000388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goswami BN, Venugopal V, Sengupta D, Madhusoodanan MS, Xavier PK (2006) Increasing trend of extreme rain events over india in awarming environment. Science 314:1442–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R (1997) Radiative forcing and climate response. J Geophys Res 102(D6):6831–6864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (2001) Clim change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 870Google Scholar
  21. Hurwitz MM, Calvo N, Garfinkel CI, Butler AH, Ineson S, Cagnazzo C, Manzini E, Peña-Ortiz C (2014) Extra-tropical atmospheric response to ENSO in the CMIP5 models. Clim Dyn 43(12):3367–3376. doi: 10.1007/s00382-014-2110-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jin Q, Wei J, Yang Z-L(2014) Positive response of Indian summer rainfall to Middle East dust. Geophy Res Lett 41(11):4068–4074. doi: 10.1002/2014GL059980 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jin Q, Wei J, Yang Z-L, Pu B, Huang J (2015) Consistent response of Indian summer monsoon to Middle East dust in observations and simulations. Atmos Chem Phys 15:9897–9915. doi: 10.5194/acp-15-9897-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones CD et al (2011) The HadGEM2-ES implementation of CMIP5 centennial simulations. Geosci Model Dev 4:543–570. doi: 10.5194/gmd-4-543-2011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kapoor RK, Kanugai KK, Paul SK, Sharma SK (1978) Characteristic features of atmospheric aerosols over India and their role in warm rain process. Pure Appl Geophys 117:583–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim D et al (2012) The tropical subseasonal variability simulated in the NASA GISS general circulation model. J Clim 25:4641–4659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krishnamurthy V, Shukla J (2008) Seasonal persistence and propagation of intraseasonal patterns over the Indian summer monsoon region. Clim Dyn 30:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuhlmann J, Quaas J (2010) How can aerosols affect the Asian summer monsoon? assessment during three consecutive pre-monsoon seasons from CALIPSO satellite data. Atmos Chem Phys 10(10):4673–4688. doi: 10.5194/acp-10-4673-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lau KM, Kim MK, Kim KM (2006) Asian summer monsoon anomalies induced by aerosol direct forcing: the role of the Tibetan Plateau. Clim Dynam 26(7–8):855–864. doi: 10.1007/s00382-006-0114-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lau KM, Ramanathan V, Wu G-X, Li Z, Tsay SC, Hsu C, Sikka R, Holben B, Lu D, Tartari G, Chin M, Koudelova P, Chen H, Ma Y, Huang J, Taniguchi K, Zhang R (2008) The joint aerosol–monsoon experiment a new challenge for monsoon climate research. BAMS 89:369–383. doi: 10.1175/bams-89-3-369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lau KM, Kim K-M, Christina NH, Brent NH (2009) Possible influences of air pollution, dust- and sandstorms on the Indian monsoon. WMO Bulletin 58(1):2009Google Scholar
  32. Lee J-Y, Wang B (2012) Future change of global monsoon in the CMIP5. Clim Dyn 42(1–2):101–119. doi: 10.1007/s00382-012-1564-0 Google Scholar
  33. Manoj MG, Devara PCS, Safai PD, Goswami BN (2011) Absorbing aerosols facilitate transition of Indian monsoon breaks to active spells. Clim Dyn 37:2181–2198. doi: 10.1007/s00382-010-0971-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Menon A, Levermann A, Schewe J, Lehmann J, Frieler K (2013) Consistent increase in Indian monsoon rainfall and its variability across CMIP-5 models. Earth Syst Dynam 4:287–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitchell TD, Jones PD (2005) An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int J Climatol 25:693–712. doi: 10.1002/Joc.1181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Niyogi D, Chang H, Chen F, Gu L, Kumar A, Menon S, Pielke RA (2007) Potential impacts of aerosol–land–atmosphere interactions on the Indian monsoonal rainfall characteristics. Nat Hazards 42:345–359. doi: 10.1007/s11069-006-9085-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pathirana A, Herath S, Yamada T, Swain D (2007) Impacts of absorbing aerosols on South Asian rainfall a modeling study. Clim Change 85:103–118. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9184-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rajeevan M, Bhate J, Kale JD, Lal B (2006) High resolution daily gridded rainfall data for the indian region: analysis of break and active monsoon spells. Curr Sci 91:296–306Google Scholar
  39. Ramanathan V et al (2005) Atmospheric brown clouds: impacts on South Asian climate and hydrological cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(15):5326–5333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500656102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ross SM (2004) Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientists. 3rd edn, Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  41. Sabeerali CT, Ramu Dandi A, Dhakate A, Salunke K, Mahapatra S, Rao SA (2013) Simulation of boreal summer intraseasonal oscillations in the latest CMIP5 coupled GCMs. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:4401–4420. doi: 10.1002/jgrd50403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Salzmann M, Weser H, Cherian R (2014) Robust response of Asian summer monsoon to anthropogenic aerosols in CMIP5 models. J Geophys Res Atmos 119:11321–11337. doi: 10.1002/2014JD021783 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sanap SD, Ayantika DC, Pandithurai G, Niranjan K (2014) Assessment of the aerosol distribution over Indian subcontinent in CMIP5 models. Atmos Environ 87:123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanap SD, Pandithurai G, Manoj MG (2015) On the response of Indian summer monsoon to aerosol forcing in CMIP5 model simulations. Clim Dyn 45(9–10):2949–2961. doi: 10.1007/s00382-015-2516-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sengupta A, Rajeevan M (2013) Uncertainty quantification and reliability analysis of CMIP5 projections for the Indian summer monsoon. Curr Sci 105(12):1692Google Scholar
  46. Sillmann J, Kharin VV, Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Bronaugh D (2013a) Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:1716–1733. doi: 10.1002/jgrd.50203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sillmann J, Kharin VV, Zwiers FW, Zhang X, Bronaugh D (2013b) Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: part 2. Future climate projections. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:2473–2493. doi: 10.1002/jgrd CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Singh C (2013a) Characteristics of monsoon breaks and intraseasonal oscillations over central India during the last half century. Atmos Res. doi:  10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.03.003 Google Scholar
  49. Singh C (2013b) Changing pattern of the Indian summer monsoon rainfall: an objective analysis. Clim Dyn 128:120–128. doi: 10.1007/s00382-013-1710-3 Google Scholar
  50. Sokolik I, Toon O (1996) Direct radiative forcing by anthropogenic airborne mineral aerosols. Nature 381:681–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2009) A summary of the CMIP5 experiment design. PCDMI Rep, pp. 33 (Available online at http://cmip-pcmdi.llnl.gov/cmip5/docs/Taylor_CMIP5_design.pdf.)
  52. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. BAMS. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1 Google Scholar
  53. Tegen I, Lacis A, Fung I (1996) The influence of climate forcing of mineral aerosols from disturbed soils. Nature 380:419–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Twomey S (1977) The influence of pollution on the shortwave Albedo of clouds. J Atmos Sci 34:1149–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vinoj V et al (2014) Short-term modulation of Indian summer monsoon rainfall by West Asian dust. Nat Geosci 7:308–313. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang C (2007) Impact of direct radiative forcing of black carbon aerosols on tropical convective precipitation. Geophys Res Lett 34:L05709. doi: 10.1029/2006GL028416 Google Scholar
  57. Watanabe M et al (2010) Improved climate simulation by MIROC5: mean states, variability, and climate sensitivity. J Clim 23:6312–6335CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine and Atmospheric Sciences DepartmentIndian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRODehradunIndia
  2. 2.Centre for Atmospheric SciencesIndian Institute of Technology DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations