Forced changes to twentieth century ENSO diversity in a last Millennium context
The El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) exhibits considerable differences between the evolution of individual El Niño and La Niña events (‘ENSO diversity’), with significant implications for impacts studies. However, the degree to which external forcing may affect ENSO diversity is not well understood, due to both internal variability and potentially compensatory contributions from multiple forcings. The Community Earth System Model Last Millennium Ensemble (CESM LME) provides an ideal testbed for studying the sensitivity of twentieth century ENSO to forced climate changes, as it contains many realizations of the 850–2005 period with differing combinations of forcings. Metrics of ENSO amplitude and diversity are compared across LME simulations, and although forced changes to ENSO amplitude are generally small, forced changes to diversity are often detectable. Anthropogenic changes to greenhouse gas and ozone/aerosol emissions modify the persistence of Eastern and Central Pacific El Niño events, through shifts in the upwelling and zonal advective feedbacks; these influences generally cancel one another over the twentieth century. Other forcings can also be quite important: land use changes amplify Eastern Pacific El Niño events via modulating zonal advective heating, and orbital forcing tends to preferentially terminate twentieth century Central Pacific El Niño events due to enhanced eastern Pacific cooling during boreal winter and spring. Our results indicate that multiple anthropogenic and natural forcings can have substantial impacts on ENSO diversity, and suggest that correctly representing the net ENSO diversity response to climate change will depend on the precise balance between all these influences.
KeywordsEl Niño/Southern oscillation Climate variability Climate modeling Tropical pacific Climate dynamics
This work is supported by an NSF EaSM Grant (AGS 1243125). The CESM project is supported by the National Science Foundation and the Office of Science (Biological and Environmental Research program) of the U.S. Department of Energy. Computing resources were provided by the Climate Simulation Laboratory at NCAR's Computational and Information Systems Laboratory (CISL), which is sponsored by the National Science Foundation and other agencies.
- Capotondi A, Wittenberg AT, Newman M, Di Loernzo E, Yu JY, Braconnot P, Cole J, Dewitte B, Giese B, Guilyardi E, Jin FF, Karnauskas K, Kirtman B, Lee T, Schneider N, Xue Y, Yeh SW (2015) Understanding ENSO diversity. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 96:921–938. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00117.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fasullo JT, Otto-Bliesner BL, Stevenson S (2017) ENSO’s changing influence on heat waves and wildfire in a changing climate. Nat Clim Change, under reviewGoogle Scholar
- Hurtt GC, Chini LP, Frolking S, Betts RA, Feddema J, Fischer F, Fisk JP, Hibbard K, Houghton RA, Janetos A, Jones CD, Kindermann G, Kinoshita T, Goldewijk KK, Riahi K, Shevliakova E, Smith S, Stehfest E, Thomson A, Thornton P, van Vuuren DP, Wang YP (2011) Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands. Clim Chang 109:117–161. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0153-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kay JE, Deser C, Phillips A, Mai A, Hannay C, Strand G, Arblaster J, Bates S, Danabasoglu G, Edwards J, Holland M, Kushner P, Lamarque JF, Lawrence D, Lindsay K, Middleton A, Munoz E, Neale R, Oleson K, Polvani L, Vertenstein M (2015) The community earth system model (CESM) large ensemble project: a community resource for studying climate change in the presence of internal climate variability. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00255.1 Google Scholar
- Lamarque JF, Bond TC, Eyring V, Granier C, Heil A, Klimont Z, Lee D, Liousse C, Mieville A, Owen B, Schultz MG, Shindell D, Smith SJ, Stehfest E, Van Aardenne J, Cooper OR, Kainuma M, Mahowald N, McConnell JR, Naik V, Riahi K, Van Vuuren DP (2010) Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: Methodology and application. Atmos Chem Phys 10:7039–7071. doi: 10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Otto-Bliesner B, Brady EC, Fasullo J, Jahn A, Landrum L, Stevenson S, Rosenbloom N, Mai A, Strand G, Edwards J (2016) Climate variability and change since 850 C.E.: an ensemble approach with the community earth system model (CESM). Bull Am Meteorol Soc. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00233.1
- Pacanowski RC, Griffies SM (1999) MOM 3.0 manual. NOAA/Geophys Fluid Dyn Lab, Princeton, NJ USA, Laboratory Report 4Google Scholar
- Philip S, van Oldenborgh G (2006) Shifts in ENSO coupling processes under global warming. Geophys Res Lett 33(L11):704Google Scholar
- Pielke RAS, Marland G, Betts RA, Chase TN, Eastman JL, Niles JO, Niyogi DS, Running SW (2002) The influence of land-use change and landscape dynamics on the climate system: relevance to climate-change policy beyond the radiative effect of greenhouse gases. Philos Trans R Soc A 360:1705–1719. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt GA, Jungclaus JH, Ammann CM, Bard E, Braconnot P, Crowley TJ, Delaygue G, Joos F, Krivova NA, Muscheler R, Otto-Bliesner BL, Pongratz J, Shindell DT, Solanki SK, Steinhilber F, Vieira LEA (2011) Climate forcing reconstructions for use in PMIP simulations of the last millennium (v1.0). Geosci Model Dev 4:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stevenson S (2012) Changes to ENSO strength and impacts in the CMIP5 models. Geophys Res Lett 39(L17):703Google Scholar
- Wittenberg AT (2009) Are historical records sufficient to constrain ENSO simulations? Geophys Res Lett 36(L12):702Google Scholar