How accurately do we know the temperature of the surface of the earth?
- 641 Downloads
The earth’s near surface air temperature is important in a variety of applications including for quantifying global warming. We analyze 6 monthly series of atmospheric temperatures from 1880 to 2012, each produced with different methodologies. We first estimate the relative error by systematically determining how close the different series are to each other, the error at a given time scale is quantified by the root mean square fluctuations in the pairwise differences between the series as well as between the individual series and the average of all the available series. By examining the differences systematically from months to over a century, we find that the standard short range correlation assumption is untenable, that the differences in the series have long range statistical dependencies and that the error is roughly constant between 1 month and one century—over most of the scale range, varying between ±0.03 and ±0.05 K. The second part estimates the absolute measurement errors. First we make a stochastic model of both the true earth temperature and then of the measurement errors. The former involves a scaling (fractional Gaussian noise) natural variability term as well as a linear (anthropogenic) trend. The measurement error model involves three terms: a classical short range error, a term due to missing data and a scale reduction term due to insufficient space–time averaging. We find that at 1 month, the classical error is ≈±0.01 K, it decreases rapidly at longer times and it is dominated by the others. Up to 10–20 years, the missing data error gives the dominate contribution to the error: 15 ± 10% of the temperature variance; at scales >10 years, the scale reduction factor dominates, it increases the amplitude of the temperature anomalies by 11 ± 8% (these uncertainties quantify the series to series variations). Finally, both the model itself as well as the statistical sampling and analysis techniques are verified on stochastic simulations that show that the model well reproduces the individual series fluctuation statistics as well as the series to series fluctuation statistics. The stochastic model allows us to conclude that with 90% certainty, the absolute monthly and globally averaged temperature will lie in the range −0.109 to 0.127 °C of the measured temperature. Similarly, with 90% certainty, for a given series, the temperature change since 1880 is correctly estimated to within ±0.108 of its value.
KeywordsGlobal temperature Uncertainty Scaling Stochastic modelling
The author thanks R. Hébert, L. del Rio Amador and David Clarke for useful discussions. This work was unfunded, there were no conflicts of interest. The data were downloaded from the publically accessible sites to be found in the corresponding references (first paragraph, Sect. 2).
- Bendjoudi, H., Hubert, P., Schertzer, D., Lovejoy, S. (1997) Interprétation multifractale des courbes intensité-durée-fréquence des précipitations, Multifractal point of view on rainfall intensity-duration-frequency curves, C.R.S., (Sciences de la terre et des planetes/Earth and Planetary Sciences). 325:323–326Google Scholar
- de Lima MIP, Lovejoy S (2015) Macroweather precipitation variability up to global and centennial scales. Wat Resour Res 51:9490–9513. doi: 10.1002/2015WR017455
- Hausfather Z, Cowtan K, Clarke DC, Jacobs P, Richardson M, Rohde R (2017) Assessing recent warming using instrumentally-homogeneous sea surface temperature records. Sci Adv 3(1):e1601207. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601207
- Karl TR, Arguez A, Huang B, Lawrimore JH, McMahon JR, Menne MJ, Peterson TC, Vose RS, Zhang H-M (2015) Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus. Sci Expr 1–4. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5632
- Lovejoy S (2013) What is climate? EOS 94(1):1–2Google Scholar
- Lovejoy S, Schertzer D (1986) Scale invariance, symmetries, fractals and stochastic simulations of atmospheric phenomena. Bulletin of the AMS 67:21–32Google Scholar
- Lovejoy S, Schertzer D (2010) Towards a new synthesis for atmospheric dynamics: space-time cascades, Atmos Res. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.01.004Google Scholar
- Lovejoy S, Schertzer D (2012a). Low frequency weather and the emergence of the Climate. In: Sharma AS, Bunde A, Baker DN, Dimri VP (eds) Extreme events and natural hazards: the complexity perspective, AGU monographs, Washington DC, pp. 231–254Google Scholar
- Lovejoy S, Scherter D, Varon D (2013a) How scaling fluctuation analyses change our view of the climate and its models (Reply to R. Pielke sr.: Interactive comment on “Do GCM’s predict the climate... or macroweather?” by S. Lovejoy et al.). Earth Syst Dynam Discuss 3:C1–C12Google Scholar
- Lovejoy S, del Rio Amador L, Hébert R (2017) Harnessing butterflies: theory and practice of the Stochastic Seasonal to Interannual Prediction System (StocSIPS). In: Tsonis AA (ed) Nonlinear Advances in Geosciences,. Springer NatureGoogle Scholar
- Pielke RA et al (2007) Unresolved issues with the assessment of multidecadal global land surface temperature trends. J Geophys Res (Atmos). 112, 2156–2202. doi:10.1029/2006JD008229Google Scholar
- Rohde R, Muller RA, Jacobsen R, Muller E, Perlmutter S, Rosenfeld A, Wurtele J, Groom D, Wickham C (2013) A New Estimate of the Average Earth Surface Land Temperature Spanning 1753 to 2011. Geoinfor Geostat: An Overview. doi:10.4172/2327-4581.1000101Google Scholar
- Veneziano D, Langousis A (2005) The areal reduction factor: a multifractal analysis. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1029/2004WR003765Google Scholar
- Williams CN, Menne M, Lawrimore JH (2012) NCDC Technical Report No. GHCNM-12-02 Modifications to Pairwise Homogeneity Adjustment software to address coding errors and improve run-time efficiency Rep., NOAA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar