Multi-model seasonal forecast of Arctic sea-ice: forecast uncertainty at pan-Arctic and regional scales
- 523 Downloads
Dynamical model forecasts in the Sea Ice Outlook (SIO) of September Arctic sea-ice extent over the last decade have shown lower skill than that found in both idealized model experiments and hindcasts of previous decades. Additionally, it is unclear how different model physics, initial conditions or forecast post-processing (bias correction) techniques contribute to SIO forecast uncertainty. In this work, we have produced a seasonal forecast of 2015 Arctic summer sea ice using SIO dynamical models initialized with identical sea-ice thickness in the central Arctic. Our goals are to calculate the relative contribution of model uncertainty and irreducible error growth to forecast uncertainty and assess the importance of post-processing, and to contrast pan-Arctic forecast uncertainty with regional forecast uncertainty. We find that prior to forecast post-processing, model uncertainty is the main contributor to forecast uncertainty, whereas after forecast post-processing forecast uncertainty is reduced overall, model uncertainty is reduced by an order of magnitude, and irreducible error growth becomes the main contributor to forecast uncertainty. While all models generally agree in their post-processed forecasts of September sea-ice volume and extent, this is not the case for sea-ice concentration. Additionally, forecast uncertainty of sea-ice thickness grows at a much higher rate along Arctic coastlines relative to the central Arctic ocean. Potential ways of offering spatial forecast information based on the timescale over which the forecast signal beats the noise are also explored.
KeywordsSea ice Seasonal forecast Arctic Forecast uncertainty
We wish to thank the Sea Ice Prediction Network, at whose annual workshop the model experiment was originally discussed. EBW, CMB and MW were supported by ONR Grant N0014-13-1-0793. JZ was supported by ONR Grant N00014-12-1-0112. This publication is partially funded by the Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean (JISAO) under NOAA Cooperative Agreement No. NA10OAR4320148, Contribution No. 2016-01-17, and Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Contribution Number 4515.
- Chevallier M, Smith GC, Dupont F, Lemieux JF, Forget G, Fujii Y, Hernandez F, Msadek R, Peterson KA, Storto A, Toyoda T et al (2016) Intercomparison of the Arctic sea ice cover in global ocean–sea ice reanalyses from the ORA-IP project. Clim Dyn 1–30. doi: 10.1007/s00382-016-2985-y
- Comiso J (2000, updated 2015) Bootstrap sea ice concentrations for nimbus-7 smmr and dmsp ssm/i, version 2. Digital Media, National Snow and Ice Data CenterGoogle Scholar
- Fetterer F, Knowles K, Meier W, Savoie M (2002, updated 2015) Sea ice index. http://nsidc.org/data/go2135.html
- Haas C (2003) Dynamics versus thermodynamics: the sea ice thickness distribution. In: Sea Ice: an Introduction to its physics, chemistry, biology, and geology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, p 402Google Scholar
- Kurtz N, Farrell S, Studinger M, Galin N, Harbeck J, Lindsay R, Onana V, Panzer B, Sonntag J (2013) Sea ice thickness, freeboard, and snow depth products from Operation IceBridge airborne data. doi: 10.5194/tc-7-1035-2013
- Tilling RL, Ridout A, Shepherd A (2016) Near real time Arctic sea ice thickness and volume from CryoSat-2. The Cryosphere (in review). doi: 10.5194/tc-2016-21