Uncertainty in twenty-first century projections of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in CMIP3 and CMIP5 models

  • Annika Reintges
  • Thomas Martin
  • Mojib Latif
  • Noel S. Keenlyside
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00382-016-3180-x

Cite this article as:
Reintges, A., Martin, T., Latif, M. et al. Clim Dyn (2016). doi:10.1007/s00382-016-3180-x

Abstract

Uncertainty in the strength of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is analyzed in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3) and Phase 5 (CMIP5) projections for the twenty-first century; and the different sources of uncertainty (scenario, internal and model) are quantified. Although the uncertainty in future projections of the AMOC index at 30°N is larger in CMIP5 than in CMIP3, the signal-to-noise ratio is comparable during the second half of the century and even larger in CMIP5 during the first half. This is due to a stronger AMOC reduction in CMIP5. At lead times longer than a few decades, model uncertainty dominates uncertainty in future projections of AMOC strength in both the CMIP3 and CMIP5 model ensembles. Internal variability significantly contributes only during the first few decades, while scenario uncertainty is relatively small at all lead times. Model uncertainty in future changes in AMOC strength arises mostly from uncertainty in density, as uncertainty arising from wind stress (Ekman transport) is negligible. Finally, the uncertainty in changes in the density originates mostly from the simulation of salinity, rather than temperature. High-latitude freshwater flux and the subpolar gyre projections were also analyzed, because these quantities are thought to play an important role for the future AMOC changes. The freshwater input in high latitudes is projected to increase and the subpolar gyre is projected to weaken. Both the freshening and the gyre weakening likely influence the AMOC by causing anomalous salinity advection into the regions of deep water formation. While the high model uncertainty in both parameters may explain the uncertainty in the AMOC projection, deeper insight into the mechanisms for AMOC is required to reach a more quantitative conclusion.

Keywords

Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) North Atlantic Ocean Climate change uncertainty Climate projections 

Supplementary material

382_2016_3180_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1733 kb)

Funding information

Funder NameGrant NumberFunding Note
Seventh Framework Programme
  • 308299
  • 603521
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • 03F0651B
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • KE 1471/2-1
  • 229774/E10

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annika Reintges
    • 1
  • Thomas Martin
    • 1
  • Mojib Latif
    • 1
    • 2
  • Noel S. Keenlyside
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research KielKielGermany
  2. 2.Kiel UniversityKielGermany
  3. 3.Geophysical Institute and Bjerknes Centre for Climate ResearchUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  4. 4.Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing CenterBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations