Projections of Southern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation interannual variability
- 284 Downloads
An analysis is made of the coherent patterns, or modes, of interannual variability of Southern Hemisphere 500 hPa geopotential height field under current and projected climate change scenarios. Using three separate multi-model ensembles (MMEs) of coupled model intercomparison project phase 5 (CMIP5) models, the interannual variability of the seasonal mean is separated into components related to (1) intraseasonal processes; (2) slowly-varying internal dynamics; and (3) the slowly-varying response to external changes in radiative forcing. In the CMIP5 RCP8.5 and RCP4.5 experiments, there is very little change in the twenty-first century in the intraseasonal component modes, related to the Southern annular mode (SAM) and mid-latitude wave processes. The leading three slowly-varying internal component modes are related to SAM, the El Niño–Southern oscillation (ENSO), and the South Pacific wave (SPW). Structural changes in the slow-internal SAM and ENSO modes do not exceed a qualitative estimate of the spatial sampling error, but there is a consistent increase in the ENSO-related variance. Changes in the SPW mode exceed the sampling error threshold, but cannot be further attributed. Changes in the dominant slowly-varying external mode are related to projected changes in radiative forcing. They reflect thermal expansion of the tropical troposphere and associated changes in the Hadley Cell circulation. Changes in the externally-forced associated variance in the RCP8.5 experiment are an order of magnitude greater than for the internal components, indicating that the SH seasonal mean circulation will be even more dominated by a SAM-like annular structure. Across the three MMEs, there is convergence in the projected response in the slow-external component.
KeywordsModes of variability Atmospheric circulation Southern Hemisphere CMIP5 models Climate change
CMIP5 data is available from http://pcmdi9.llnl.gov. We acknowledge the World Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output. For CMIP, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals. We acknowledge the resources and support of the National Computational Infrastructure at the Australian National University for maintaining the CMIP5 data at the Australian Earth Systems Grid node. J. Sisson provided invaluable assistance in pre-processing the CMIP5 data. This work is supported by the Australian Government Department of the Environment through the Australian Climate Change Science Program. X. Zheng is supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2012CB956203). Comments from A. Dowdy, S. Osbrough and two anonymous reviewers helped to considerably improve this paper.
- CCIA (2015) Climate change in Australia. Information for Australia’s natural resource management regions: Technical report. CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology, Australia. http://climatechangeinaustralia.gov.au/media/ccia/2.1.4/cms_page_media/168/CCIA_PROJECTIONS_TECHNICAL_REPORT.pdf
- Collins M et al (2013) Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility. In: Stocker TF et al (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1029–1136Google Scholar
- Flato G et al (2013) Evaluation of climate models. In: Stocker TF et al (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 741–866Google Scholar
- Frederiksen CS, Zheng X (2007b) Coherent patterns of interannual variability of the atmospheric circulation: the role of intraseasonal variability. In: Denier J, Frederiksen JS (eds) Frontiers in turbulence and coherent structures. World scientific lecture notes in complex systems, vol 6. World Scientific Publications, Singapore, pp 87–120. doi: 10.1142/6320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grainger S, Frederiksen CS, Zheng X (2011a) Estimating components of covariance between two climate variables using model ensembles. ANZIAM J 52:C318–C332. http://journal.austms.org.au/ojs/index.php/ANZIAMJ/article/view/3928
- Holton JR (2004) An introduction to dynamic meteorology. Elsevier Academic Publishing, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
- Wilks DS (2006) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. Academic Press, San Diego, p 648Google Scholar