Evaluation of precipitation and temperature simulation performance of the CMIP3 and CMIP5 historical experiments
- 829 Downloads
The fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) is the most recent coordinated experiment of global climate modeling. Compared to its predecessor CMIP3, the fifth phase of the homonymous experiment—CMIP5 involves a greater number of GCMs, run at higher resolutions with more complex components. Here we use daily GCM data from both projects to test their efficiency in representing precipitation and temperature parameters with the use of a state of the art high resolution gridded global dataset for land areas and for the period 1960–2005. Two simple metrics, a comprehensive histogram similarity metric based on the match of simulated and observed empirical pdfs and a metric for the representation of the annual cycle were employed as performance indicators. The metrics were used to assess the skill of each GCM at the entire spectrum of precipitation and temperature pdfs but also for the upper and lower tails of it. Results are presented globally and regionally for 26 land regions that represent different climatic regimes, covering the total earth’s land surface except for Antarctica. Compared to CMIP3, CMIP5 models perform better in simulating precipitation including relatively intense events and the fraction of wet days. For temperature the improvement is not as clear except for the upper and lower hot and cold events of the distribution. The agreement of model simulations is also considerably increased in CMIP5. Substantial improvement in intense precipitation is observed over North Europe, Central and Eastern North America and North East Europe. Nevertheless, in both ensembles some models clearly perform better than others from a histogram similarity point of view. The derived skill score metrics provide essential information for impact studies based on global or regional land area multi-model ensembles.
KeywordsPrecipitation Temperature CMIP3 CMIP5 Intercomparison Skill score
A. Koutroulis and L. Papadimitriou were partly supported by the High-End cLimate Impacts and eXtremes (HELIX) project which has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under Grant Agreement No. 603864. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modeling groups (listed in Table 1 of this paper) for producing and making available their model output. We also acknowledge the modeling groups, the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) and the WCRP’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling (WGCM) for their roles in making available the WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset. For CMIP the U.S. Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.
- Deliverable E (2008) D3. 2.2. RCM-specific Weight based their Abil. to simulate Present Clim. calibrated ERA40-based simulations. www.ensembleseu.org
- K-1 model Developers (2004) K-1 coupled model (MIROC) description. Ed by H Hasumi Emori, S Cent Clim Syst Res Univ Tokyo K-1 technics, pp 1–34Google Scholar
- Flato G, Marotzke J, Abiodun B, Braconnot P, Chou SC, Collins W, Cox P, Driouech F, Emori S, Eyring V, Forest C, Gleckler P, Guilyardi E, Jakob C, Kattsov V, Reason C, Rummukainen M (2013) Evaluation of climate models. In: Stocker TF et al (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 741–866Google Scholar
- Gordon HB, Rotstayn LD, McGregor JL et al (2002) The CSIRO Mk3 Climate System Model. CSIRO Atmos Res Tech Pap no 60:130Google Scholar
- Gordon H, O’Farrell S, Collier M et al (2010) The CSIRO Mk3. 5 climate model. CAWCRGoogle Scholar
- Jungclaus JH, Keenlyside N, Botzet M et al (2006) Ocean circulation and tropical variability in the coupled model ECHAM5/MPI-OM. J Clim 19Google Scholar
- Marti O, Braconnot P, Bellier J et al (2005) The new IPSL climate system model: IPSL-CM4. Note du Pôle Modélisation, IPSL 26:1–86Google Scholar
- Meehl GA, Washington WM, Santer BD et al (2006) Climate change projections for the twenty-first century and climate change commitment in the CCSM3. J Clim 19Google Scholar
- Salas-Mélia D, Chauvin F, Déqué M et al (2005) Description and validation of the CNRM-CM3 global coupled model. CNRM Work note 103 36Google Scholar
- Weedon GP, Gomes S, Viterbo P et al (2010) The WATCH forcing data 1958–2001: a meteorological forcing dataset for land surface and hydrological models. Watch. Ed. Watch Tech. Rep. 22:Google Scholar