Advertisement

Climate Dynamics

, Volume 46, Issue 5–6, pp 1753–1768 | Cite as

Spatial distribution and the interdecadal change of leading modes of heat budget of the mixed-layer in the tropical Pacific and the association with ENSO

  • Zeng-Zhen Hu
  • Arun Kumar
  • Bohua Huang
Article

Abstract

Using heat budget diagnosis of ocean mixed layer from the Global Ocean Data Assimilation System, the spatial distribution of the leading modes of the heat budget was examined. The analysis was for the tropical Pacific in 1979–2013 and was based on combined empirical orthogonal function (CEOF) analysis. The interdecadal changes of the leading modes and their associations with El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) were also analyzed. The first leading CEOF mode (CEOF1) corresponds to the ENSO mature phase. The contribution from the zonal advection was relatively small along the equator, except the region near the Pacific coast of Central America. The vertical entrainment and diffusion (surface heat flux) had pronounced maxima with positive (negative) values along the equatorial central and eastern Pacific. The meridional advection displayed a different spatial pattern with large positive values on both sides of the equator and smaller values along the equator. The total meridional advection anomaly was mainly determined by advection of anomalous temperature by climatological current responsible for broadening of the ENSO SSTA pattern meridionally. The zonal advection varied almost simultaneously with the tendency of ocean temperature anomaly in the mixed layer. The second leading CEOF mode (CEOF2) included contribution to SSTA tendency during the ENSO developing phase. The distribution pattern and amplitude of the zonal advection in the eastern Pacific in CEOF2 was similar to but with opposite sign to that in CEOF1. The amplitudes of the other dynamical and thermodynamical terms were smaller than that in CEOF1 and spatial distributions displayed an opposite variation between the Pacific coast of Central America and central and eastern tropical Pacific in CEOF2. A comparison of two periods (1979–1999 and 2000–2013) suggested that coupling in the tropical Pacific weakened at ENSO time scales and shifted to a relatively higher frequency regime (from 2 to 4 years averaged in 1979–1999 to 1.5–3 years) after 2000.

Keywords

Spatial distribution Leading modes of heat budget of the mixed-layer The tropical Pacific The association with ENSO Interdecadal change Global Ocean Data Assimilation System 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We appreciated the insight comments and suggestions from two reviewers, which significantly improve the paper. We discussed with Prof. Fei-Fei Jin during early stage of this work. Bohua Huang is supported by grants from NSF (ATM-0830068), NOAA (NA09OAR4310058), and NASA (NNX09AN50G). The procedure of the heat budget calculation used in this work was developed by Dr. Boyin Huang and is maintained by Dr. C. Wen. The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any view or opinions expressed herein, are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NWS, NOAA, or the Department of Commerce.

References

  1. Barnston AG, Chelliah M, Goldenberg SB (1997) Documentation of a highly ENSO-related SST region in the equatorial Pacific. Atmos Ocean 35:367–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battisti DS, Hirst AC (1989) Interannual variability in a tropical atmosphere-ocean model: influence of the basic state, ocean geometry and nonlinearity. J Atmos Sci 46:1687–1712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bay T, Dommenget D (2014) Comparing the spatial structure of variability in two datasets against each other on the basis of EOF-modes. Clim Dyn 42:1631–1648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Behringer DW (2005) The global ocean data assimilation system (GODAS) at NCEP, 11th Symposium on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for the Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface (IOAS-AOLS), San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 3.3 [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/87ANNUAL/webprogram/11IOAS.html]
  5. Behringer DW, Xue Y (2004) Evaluation of the global ocean data assimilation system at NCEP: the Pacific Ocean. Preprints, Eighth Symp. on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 2.3 [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/84Annual/techprogram/paper_70720.htm]
  6. Bjerknes J (1969) Atmospheric teleconnections from the equatorial Pacific. Mon Weather Rev 97:163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke AJ (2010) Analytical theory for the quasi-steady and low-frequency equatorial ocean response to wind forcing: the ‘tilt’ and ‘warm water volume’ modes. J Phys Ocean 40(1):121–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dommenget D, Latif M (2002) A cautionary note on the interpretation of EOFs. J Climate 15:216–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glantz MH (2000) Currents of change: impacts of El Niño and La Niña on climate and society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p 266. ISBN 052178672XGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu Z-Z, Nitta T (1996) Wavelet analysis of summer rainfall over North China and India and SOI using 1891–1992 data. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 74(6):833–844Google Scholar
  11. Hu Z-Z, Kumar A, Jha B, Wang W, Huang B, Huang B (2012) An analysis of warm pool and cold tongue El Niños: air-sea coupling processes, global influences, and recent trends. Climate Dyn 38(9–10):2017–2035. doi: 10.1007/s00382-011-1224-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu Z-Z, Kumar A, Ren H-L, Wang H, L’Heureux M, Jin F-F (2013a) Weakened interannual variability in the tropical Pacific Ocean since 2000. J Climate 26(8):2601–2613. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00265.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu Z-Z, Kumar A, Huang B, Zhu J (2013b) Leading modes of upper ocean temperature interannual variability along the equatorial Atlantic Ocean in NCEP GODAS. J Climate 26(13):4649–4663. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00629.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang B, Schneider EK (1995) The response of an ocean general circulation model to surface wind stress produced by an atmospheric general circulation model. Mon Weather Rev 123:3059–3085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang B, Xue Y, Zhang D, Kumar A, McPhaden MJ (2010) The NCEP GODAS ocean analysis of the tropical Pacific mixed layer heat budget on seasonal to interannual time scales. J Climate 23:4901–4925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang B, Xue Y, Wang H, Wang W, Kumar A (2012) Mixed layer heat budget of the El Niño in NCEP climate forecast system. Climate Dyn 39(1–2):365–381. doi: 10.1007/s00382-011-1111-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jin F-F (1997a) An equatorial ocean recharge paradigm for ENSO. Part I: conceptual model. J Atmos Sci 54:811–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jin F-F (1997b) An equatorial ocean recharge paradigm for ENSO. Part II: a stripped-down coupled model. J Atmos Sci 54:830–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kanamitsu M et al (2002) NCEP-DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2). Bull Am Met Soc 83:1631–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kang I-S, An S-I, Jin F-F (2001) A systematic approximation of the SST anomaly equation for ENSO. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 79:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kao H-Y, Yu J-Y (2009) Contrasting eastern-Pacific and central-Pacific types of ENSO. J Climate 22:615–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kug J-S, Jin F-F, An S-I (2009) Two types of El Niño events: cold tongue El Niño and warm pool El Niño. J Climate 22:1499–1515. doi: 10.1175/2008JCLI2624.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar A, Hu Z-Z (2014) Interannual and interdecadal variability of ocean temperature along the equatorial Pacific in conjunction with ENSO. Climate Dyn 42(5–6):1243–1258. doi: 10.1007/s00382-013-1721-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lau N-C, Philander SGH, Nath MJ (1992) Simulation of ENSO-like phenomena with a low-resolution coupled GCM of the global ocean and atmosphere. J Climate 5(4):284–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee T, McPhaden MJ (2010) Increasing intensity of El Niño in the central equatorial Pacific. Geophys Res Lett 37:L14603. doi: 10.1029/2010GL044007 Google Scholar
  26. McPhaden MJ (2012) A 21st century shift in the relationship between ENSO SST and warm water volume anomalies. Geophys Res Lett 39:L09706. doi: 10.1029/2012GL051826 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meinen CS, McPhaden MJ (2000) Observations of warm water volume changes in the equatorial Pacific and their relationship to El Niño and La Niña. J Climate 13:3551–3559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Research Council (2010) Assessment of Intraseasonal to Interannual Climate Prediction and Predictability. The National Academies Press, Washington, p 192. ISBN 0-309-15183-XGoogle Scholar
  29. North GR, Bell TL, Cahalan RF, Moeng FJ (1982) Sampling errors in the estimation of empirical orthogonal functions. Mon Weather Rev 110:699–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Picaut J, Masia F, du Penhoat Y (1997) An advective-reflective conceptual model for the oscillatory nature of the ENSO. Science 277:663–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rasmusson EM, Carpenter TH (1982) Variation in tropical sea surface temperature and surface wind fields associated with Southern Oscillation/El Niño. Mon Weather Rev 110:354–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reynolds RW, Rayner NA, Smith TM, Stokes DC, Wang W (2002) An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate. J Climate 15:1609–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sarachik ES, Cane MA (2010) The El Niño-Southern Oscillation Phenomenon. Cambridge University Press, London 384 pp CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schopf PS, Suarez MJ (1987) Vacillations in a coupled ocean-atmosphere model. J Atmos Sci 45:549–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walker GT (1923) Correlations in seasonal variations of weather, VIII. A preliminary study of world weather I. Mem India Meteorol Dep 23:75–131Google Scholar
  36. Wang C (2001) A unified oscillator model for the El Niño-Southern Oscillation. J Climate 14:98–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang W, Chen M, Kumar A (2010) An assessment of the CFS real-time seasonal forecasts. Weather Forecast 25:950–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wen C, Kumar A, Xue Y, McPhaden MJ (2014) Changes in tropical pacific thermocline depth and their relationship to ENSO after 1999. J Climate 27:7230–7249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wyrtki K (1975) E1 Niño-the dynamic response of the equatorial Pacific Ocean to atmospheric forcing. J Phys Ocean 5:572–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wyrtki K (1985) Water displacements in the Pacific and the genesis of El Niño cycles. J Geophys Res 90(C4):7129–7132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xiang B, Wang B, Li T (2013) A new paradigm for the predominance of standing Central Pacific warming after the late 1990s. Climate Dyn 41(2):327–340. doi: 10.1007/s00382-012-1427-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yeh S, Kug J, Dewitte B, Kwon M, Kirtman BP, Jin F-F (2009) El Niño in a changing climate. Nature 461(7263):511–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zebiak SE, Cane MA (1987) A model El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Mon Wea Rev 115:2262–2278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang R-H, Levitus S (1996) Structure and evolution of interannual variability of the tropical Pacific upper ocean temperature. J Geophys Res 101:20501–20524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang Q, Kumar A, Xue Y, Wang W, Jin F-F (2007) Analysis of ENSO cycle in NCEP coupled forecast model. J Climate 20:1265–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhu J, Huang B, Balmased MA (2012) An ensemble estimation of the variability of upper-ocean heat content over the tropical Atlantic Ocean with multi-ocean reanalysis products. Climate Dyn 39(3–4):1001–1020. doi: 10.1007/s00382-011-1189-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag (outside the USA) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Climate Prediction CenterNCEP/NWS/NOAACollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Earth Sciences, College of ScienceGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  3. 3.Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies, 270 Research Hall, Mail Stop 6C5George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations