How the AMOC affects ocean temperatures on decadal to centennial timescales: the North Atlantic versus an interhemispheric seesaw
- 643 Downloads
This study investigates how variations of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) affect sea surface temperature (SST) within the simulations of the coupled model intercomparison project phase 5. In particular, we explore whether the SST response is interhemispheric in nature, specifically as reflected in the Atlantic SST Dipole index, or whether the response is localized more in the North Atlantic Ocean. In the absence of direct observational data, this Dipole index has been proposed to approximate AMOC variations over the duration of the instrumental temperature record. We find that typically, on timescales between decadal and centennial, the SST Dipole index correlates with the AMOC with coefficients ranging from 0.2 to 0.7, typically with a 0–6 year lag, and thus explains less than half of the AMOC variance. In just two models this value slightly exceeds 50 %. Even for the models with the highest correspondence between the AMOC and the Dipole index, the correlation between the two variables is controlled mainly by SST variations in the North Atlantic, not the South Atlantic, both for the model control and historical simulations. Consequently, in nearly all models, the North Atlantic SST provides a better indicator of AMOC variations than the Atlantic Dipole. Thus, on decadal to centennial timescales AMOC variability affects mainly the North Atlantic Ocean, with the sensitivity of the North Atlantic SST between 40 and 60°N, given by the multi-model average, of about 0.3 °C per 1 Sv of AMOC change, explaining roughly one third of the SST variance.
KeywordsAMOC SST Dipole AOGCMs
- Latif M, Roeckner E, Botzet M, Esch M, Haak H, Hagemann S, Jungclaus J, Legutke S, Marsland S, Mikolajewicz U, Mitchell J (2004) Reconstructing, monitoring, and predicting multidecadal-scale changes in the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation with sea surface temperature. J Clim 19:4631–4637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Latif M, Böning C, Willebrand J, Biastoch A, Dengg J, Keenlyside N, Schweckendiek U, Madec G (2006) Is the thermohaline circulation changing? Science 317(5840):935–938Google Scholar
- Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2009) A summary of the CMIP5 experiment design, PCMDI, 33 pp. http://cmip-pcmdi.llnl.gov/cmip5/docs/Taylor_CMIP5_design
- Ting M, Kushnir Y, Seager R, Li C (2011) Robust features of the Atlantic multi-decdal variability and its climate impacts. Geophys Res Lett 38:L17705Google Scholar