Snow is a vital resource for a host of natural and human systems. Global warming is projected to drive widespread decreases in snow accumulation by the end of the century, potentially affecting water, food, and energy supplies, seasonal heat extremes, and wildfire risk. However, over the next few decades, when the planning and implementation of current adaptation responses are most relevant, the snow response is more uncertain, largely because of uncertainty in regional and local precipitation trends. We use a large (40-member) single-model ensemble climate model experiment to examine the influence of precipitation variability on the direction and magnitude of near-term Northern Hemisphere snow trends. We find that near-term uncertainty in the sign of regional precipitation change does not cascade into uncertainty in the sign of regional snow accumulation change. Rather, temperature increases drive statistically robust consistency in the sign of future near-term snow accumulation trends, with all regions exhibiting reductions in the fraction of precipitation falling as snow, along with mean decreases in late-season snow accumulation. However, internal variability does create uncertainty in the magnitude of hemispheric and regional snow changes, including uncertainty as large as 33 % of the baseline mean. In addition, within the 40-member ensemble, many mid-latitude grid points exhibit at least one realization with a statistically significant positive trend in net snow accumulation, and at least one realization with a statistically significant negative trend. These results suggest that the direction of near-term snow accumulation change is robust at the regional scale, but that internal variability can influence the magnitude and direction of snow accumulation changes at the local scale, even in areas that exhibit a high signal-to-noise ratio.
Snow CCSM3 Climate variability Water availability Global warming
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank two anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments. The CCSM3 simulations—called the “twenty-first century CCSM3 Large Ensemble Project”—were produced by the NCAR Climate Variability and Climate Change Working Group and were analyzed using computing resources provided by the Center for Computational Earth and Environmental Sciences (CEES) at Stanford University. We thank NCAR and the Earth System Grid Federation (earthsystemgrid.org) for access to the CCSM3 simulations. The GLDAS-2 data used in this study were acquired as part of the mission of NASA’s Earth Science Division and archived and distributed by the Goddard Earth Sciences (GES) Data and Information Services Center (DISC). We acknowledge Felix Schönbrodt for his R statistical routine “visually-weighted regression,” (available here: http://www.nicebread.de/visually-weighted-watercolor-plots-new-variants-please-vote/). Our work was supported by the Margaret Jonsson Family Fellowship and NSF award 0955283.
Adam JC, Hamlet AF, Lettenmaier DP (2009) Implications of global climate change for snowmelt hydrology in the twenty-first century. Hydrol Process 972:962–972. doi:10.1002/hyp.7201/full
Akhtar M, Ahmad N, Booij MJ (2009) Use of regional climate model simulations as input for hydrological models for the Hindukush-Karakorum-Himalaya region. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13(7):1075–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashfaq M et al (2010) Influence of climate model biases and daily-scale temperature and precipitation events on hydrological impacts assessment: a case study of the United States. J Geophys Res 115(D14):D14116. doi:10.1029/2009JD012965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter TR (2007) et al New assessment methods and the characterisation of future conditions. In: Parry ML et al. (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 133–171Google Scholar
Cohen JL et al (2012) Arctic warming, increasing snow cover and widespread boreal winter cooling. Environ Res Lett 7(1):014007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann DL, Tank AMGK, Rusticucci M (2013) Chapter 2: observations: atmosphere and surface. In: Working group I contribution to the IPCC 5th assessment report “climate change 2013: the physical science basis”, p 165Google Scholar
Hatfield JL et al (2011) Climate Impacts on agriculture: implications for crop production. Agron J 103(2):351–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tague C, Peng H (2013) The sensitivity of forest water use to the timing of precipitation and snowmelt recharge in the California Sierra: implications for a warming climate. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 118(2):875–887. doi:10.1002/jgrg.20073CrossRefGoogle Scholar