Downscaling near-surface wind over complex terrain using a physically-based statistical modeling approach
- 504 Downloads
A physically-based statistical modeling approach to downscale coarse resolution reanalysis near-surface winds over a region of complex terrain is developed and tested in this study. Our approach is guided by physical variables and meteorological relationships that are important for determining near-surface wind flow. Preliminary fine scale winds are estimated by correcting the course-to-fine grid resolution mismatch in roughness length. Guided by the physics shaping near-surface winds, we then formulate a multivariable linear regression model which uses near-surface micrometeorological variables and the preliminary estimates as predictors to calculate the final wind products. The coarse-to-fine grid resolution ratio is approximately 10–1 for our study region of southern California. A validated 3-km resolution dynamically-downscaled wind dataset is used to train and validate our method. Winds from our statistical modeling approach accurately reproduce the dynamically-downscaled near-surface wind field with wind speed magnitude and wind direction errors of <1.5 ms−1 and 30°, respectively. This approach can greatly accelerate the production of near-surface wind fields that are much more accurate than reanalysis data, while limiting the amount of computational and time intensive dynamical downscaling. Future studies will evaluate the ability of this approach to downscale other reanalysis data and climate model outputs with varying coarse-to-fine grid resolutions and domains of interest.
KeywordsNear-surface wind Dynamical downscaling Statistical downscaling Complex terrain
This work was supported by the Department of Energy Grant #DE-SC0001467 and the California Institute for Energy & Environment Grant #POEA01-A02. The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments.
- Chen F, Kusaka H, Bornstein R, Ching J, Grimmond CSB, Grossman-Clarke S, Loridan T, Manning KW, Martilli A, Miao S, Sailor D, Salamanca FP, Taha H, Tewari M, Wang X, Wyszogrodzki AA, Zhang C (2011) The integrated WRF/urban modeling system: development, evaluation, and applications to urban environmental problems. Int J Climatol 31:273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garratt JR (1994) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 49–60Google Scholar
- Lo JC-F, Yang Z-L, Pielke RA Sr (2008) Assessment of three dynamical climate downscaling methods using the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model. J Geophys Res 113:D09112Google Scholar
- Mlawer EJ, Taubman PD, Iacono MJ, Clough SA (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J Geophys Res 102(16):663–682Google Scholar
- Monin AS, Obukhov AM (1954) Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the ground layer of the atmosphere. Tr Geofiz Inst Akad Nauk SSSR 24:163–187Google Scholar
- Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Duda M, Huang X-Y, Wang W, Power JG (2008) A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. NCAR technical note, NCAR/tech notes-475 + STR, 125 ppGoogle Scholar
- Yoon J-H, Ruby Leung L, Correia J Jr (2012) Comparison of dynamically and statistically downscaled seasonal climate forecasts for the cold season over the United States. J Geophys Res 117:D21109Google Scholar