Climate Dynamics

, Volume 43, Issue 12, pp 3219–3244 | Cite as

The use of fractional accumulated precipitation for the evaluation of the annual cycle of monsoons

Article

Abstract

Using pentad rainfall data we demonstrate the benefits of using accumulated rainfall and fractional accumulated rainfall for the evaluation of the annual cycle of rainfall over various monsoon domains. Our approach circumvents issues related to using threshold-based analysis techniques for investigating the life-cycle of monsoon rainfall. In the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project-5 models we find systematic errors in the phase of the annual cycle of rainfall. The models are delayed in the onset of summer rainfall over India, the Gulf of Guinea, and the South American Monsoon, with early onset prevalent for the Sahel and the North American Monsoon. This, in combination with the rapid fractional accumulation rate, impacts the ability of the models to simulate the fractional accumulation observed during summer. The rapid fractional accumulation rate and the time at which the accumulation begins are metrics that indicate how well the models concentrate the monsoon rainfall over the peak rainfall season, and the extent to which there is a phase error in the annual cycle. The lack of consistency in the phase error across all domains suggests that a “global” approach to the study of monsoons may not be sufficient to rectify the regional differences. Rather, regional process studies are necessary for diagnosing the underlying causes of the regionally-specific systematic model biases over the different monsoon domains. Despite the afore-mentioned biases, most models simulate well the interannual variability in the date of monsoon onset, the exceptions being models with the most pronounced dry biases. Two methods for estimating monsoon duration are presented, one of which includes nonlinear aspects of the fractional accumulation. The summer fractional accumulation of rainfall provides an objective way to estimate the extent of the monsoon domain, even in models with substantial dry biases for which monsoon is not defined using threshold-based techniques.

Keywords

Summer monsoon rainfall Annual cycle Climate model intercomparison Systematic error Metrics 

References

  1. Ananthakrishnan R, Soman MK (1988) The onset of the southwest monsoon over Kerala: 1901–1980. J Climatol 8:283–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Annamalai H, Mehari M, Sperber KR (2014) A recipe for ENSO-monsoon diagnostics in CMIP5 models. J Clim (in preparation) Google Scholar
  3. Bambardi RJ, Caravalho LMV (2009) IPCC global coupled model simulations of the South America monsoon system. Clim Dyn 33:893–916. doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0488-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carvalho LMV, Jones C, Posadas AND, Quiroz R, Bookhagen B, Liebmann B (2012) Precipitation characteristics of the South American monsoon system derived from multiple datasets. J Clim 25:4600–4620. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00335.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coleman RA, Moise AF, Hanson LI (2011) Tropical Australian climate and Australian monsoon as simulated by 23 CMIP3 models. J Geophys Res 116:D10116. doi:10.1029/2010JD015149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook KH, Meehl GA, Arblaster JM (2012) Monsoon regimes and processes in CCSM4. Part II: African and American monsoon systems. J Clim 25:2609–2621. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00185.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gleckler PJ, Sperber KR, AchutaRao K (2006) Annual cycle of global ocean heat content: observed and simulated. J Geophys Res 111:C06008. doi:10.1029/2005JC003223 Google Scholar
  8. Grimm AM (2003) The El Nino impact on the summer monsoon in Brazil: regional processes versus remote influences. J Clim 16:263–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hourdin F, Musat I, Grandpeix J-Y, Polcher J, Guichard F, Favot F, Marquet P, Boone A, Lafore J-P, Redelsperger J-L, Ruti PM, Dell’aquila A, Filiberti M-A, Pham M, Doval TL, Traore AK, Gallee H (2010) AMMA-model intercomparison project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:95–104. doi:10.1175/2009BAMS2791.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huffman GJ, Adler RF, Arkin P, Chang A, Ferraro R, Gruber A, Janowiak J, McNab A, Rudolf B, Schneider UJ (1997) The global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) combined precipitation dataset. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78:5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones C, Carvahlo LMV (2013) Climate change in the South American monsoon system: present climate and CMIP5 projections. J Clim. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00412.1 Google Scholar
  12. Joseph PV, Eischeid JJ, Pyle RJ (1994) Interannual variability of the onset of the Indian summer monsoon and its association with atmospheric features, El Nino, and sea surface temperature anomalies. J Clim 7:81–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kirkyla KI, Hameed S (1989) Harmonic analysis of the seasonal cycle in precipitation over the United States: a comparison between observations and a general circulation model. J Clim 2:1463–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li CF, Yanai M (1996) The onset and interannual variability of the Asian summer monsoon in relation to land sea thermal contrast. J Clim 9:358–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liebmann B, Marengo JA (2001) Interannual variability of the rainy season and rainfall in the Brazilian Amazon basin. J Clim 14:4308–4318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Matsumoto J (1997) Seasonal transition of summer rainy season over Indochina and adjacent monsoon regions. Adv Atmos Sci 14:231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nicholson SE (1980) The nature of rainfall fluctuations in subtropical West Africa. Mon Weather Rev 108:473–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rowell DP, Folland CK, Maskall K, Owen JA, Ward MN (1992) Modelling the influence of global sea surface temperatures on the variability and predictability of seasonal Sahel rainfall. Geophys Res Lett 19:905–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sperber KR, Palmer TN (1996) Interannual tropical rainfall variability in general circulation model simulations associated with the atmospheric model intercomparison project. J Clim 9:2727–2750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sperber KR, Annamalai H, Kang I-S, Kitoh A, Moise A, Turner A, Wang B, Zhou T (2013) The Asian summer monsoon: an intercomparison of CMIP5 vs. CMIP3 simulations of the late 20th century. Clim Dyn 41:2711–2744. doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1607-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vera C, Higgins W, Amador J, Ambrizzi T, Garreaud R, Gochis D, Gutzler D, Lettenmaier D, Marengo J, Mechoso CR, Nogues-Paegle J, Silva Dias PL, Zhang C (2006) Toward a unified view of the American monsoon systems. J Clim 19:4977–5000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vizy EK, Cook KH, Cretat J, Neupane N (2013) Projections of a wetter Sahel in the twenty-first century from global and regional models. J Clim 26:4664–4687. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00533.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang B, Ding Q (2008) Global monsoon: dominant mode of annual variation in the tropics. Dyn Atmos Oceans 44:165–183. doi:10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2007.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang B, LinHo (2002) Rainy season of the Asian-Pacific summer monsoon. J Clim 15:386–398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Webster PJ, Magana VO, Palmer TN, Shukla J, Tomas RA, Yanai M, Yasunari T (1998) Monsoons: processes, predictability, and the prospects for prediction. J Geophys Res C7(103):14451–14510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xie PP, Arkin PA (1997a) Global pentad precipitation analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates and model outputs. Extended abstracts, American Geophysical Union 1997 Fall meeting, San Francisco, CA, American Geophysical UnionGoogle Scholar
  28. Xie PP, Arkin PA (1997b) Global precipitation: a 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model outputs. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78:2539–2558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xie PP, Janowiak JE, Arkin PA, Adler R, Gruber A, Ferraro R, Huffman GJ, Curtis S (2003) GPCP pentad precipitation analyses: an experimental dataset based on gauge observations and satellite estimates. J Clim 16:2197–2214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yin L, Fu R, Shevliakova E, Dickinson RE (2012) How well can CMIP5 simulate precipitation and its controlling processes over tropical South America. Clim Dyn. doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1582-y Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and IntercomparisonLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLivermoreUSA
  2. 2.International Pacific Research CenterUniversity of Hawai’iHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations