A mass flux closure function in a GCM based on the Richardson number
- 273 Downloads
A mass flux closure in a general circulation model (GCM) was developed in terms of the mean gradient Richardson number (GRN), which is defined as the ratio between the buoyancy and the shear-driven kinetic energy in the planetary boundary layer. The cloud resolving model (CRM) simulations using the tropical ocean and global atmosphere-coupled ocean–atmosphere response experiment forcing show that cloud-base mass flux is well correlated with the GRN. Using the CRM simulations, a mass flux closure function is formulated as an exponential function of the GRN and it is implemented in the Arakawa–Schubert convective scheme. The GCM simulations with the new mass flux closure are compared to those of the GCM with the conventional mass flux closure based on convective available potential energy. Because of the exponential function, the new closure permits convective precipitation only when the GRN has a sufficiently large value. When the GRN has a relatively small value, the convection is suppressed while the convective instability is released by large-scale precipitation. As a result, the ratio of convective precipitation to total precipitation is reduced and there is an increase in the frequency of heavy precipitation, more similar to the observations. The new closure also improves the diurnal cycle of precipitation due to a time delay of the large GRN with respect to convective instability.
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MEST) (NRF-2012M1A2A2671775) and by the Brain Korea 21 Plus.
- Bonan GB (1996) Land surface model (LSM version 1.0) for ecological, hydrological, and atmospheric studies: technical description and user’s guide. NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-417 + STR. doi: 10.5065/D6DF6P5X
- Le Treut H, Li Z-X (1991) Sensitivity of an atmospheric general circulation model to prescribed SST changes: feedback effects associated with the simulation of cloud optical properties. Clim Dyn 5:175–187Google Scholar
- Nakajima T, Tsukamoto M, Tsushima Y, Numaguti A (1995) Modelling of the radiative processes in an AGCM. Clim Syst Dyn Model 3:104–123Google Scholar
- Pan DM, Randall DD (1998) A cumulus parameterization with a prognostic closure. Q J R Meteorol Soc 124:949–981Google Scholar
- Tiedtke M (1984) The effect of penetrative cumulus convection on the large-scale flow in a general circulation model. Beiträge zur Physik der Atmosphäre 57:216–239Google Scholar
- Tokioka T (1988) The equatorial 30-60 day oscillation and the Arakawa–Schubert penetrative cumulus parameterization. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 66:883–901Google Scholar
- Zhang GJ (2002) Convective quasi-equilibrium in midlatitude continental environment and its effect on convective parameterization. J Geohys Res 107. doi: 10.1029/2001JD001005
- Zhang GJ, Mu M (2005) Effects of modifications to the Zhang-McFarlane convection parameterization on the simulation of the tropical precipitation in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model, version 3. J Geophys Res 110:1–12Google Scholar