On the misinterpretation of the North Atlantic Oscillation in CMIP5 models
- 1.2k Downloads
The representation of the wintertime North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and its relationship with atmospheric blocking and the Atlantic jet stream is investigated in a set of CMIP5 models. It is shown that some state-of-the-art climate models are unable to correctly simulate the physical processes connected to the NAO. This is especially true for models with a strongly underestimated frequency of high-latitude blocking over Greenland. In these models the first empirical orthogonal function (EOF1) of the Euro-Atlantic sector can represent at least three different categories of dominant modes of variability associated with different prevalent regions of blocking occurrence and jet stream displacements. It is therefore possible to show that such “biased NAOs” are connected with different dynamical processes with respect to the canonical NAO seen in observations. Since the NAO is a widely used concept in scientific community, the consequent “dynamical misinterpretation” of the NAO that can result when climate models are analyzed may have important implications for the NAO-related studies. This may be especially relevant for the ones involving climate scenarios, since these modeled NAOs may react differently to greenhouse gas forcing.
KeywordsAtlantic jet stream North Atlantic Oscillation CMIP5 Atmospheric blocking
This work has been funded by the Project of Strategic Interest NextData of the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) (http://www.nextdataproject.it).
- Anstey JA, Davini P, Gray LJ, Woollings TJ, Butchart N, Cagnazzo C, Christiansen B, Hardiman SC, Osprey SM, Yang S (2013) Multi-model analysis of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking: model biases and the role of resolution. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:3956–3971Google Scholar
- Barnes E, Hartmann D (2012) Detection of Rossby wave breaking and its response to shifts of the midlatitude jet with climate change. J Geophys Res 117(D9):D09,117Google Scholar
- Barnes EA, Polvani L (2013) Response of the midlatitude jets, and of their variability, to increased greenhouse gases in the CMIP5 models. J Clim 26:7117–7135Google Scholar
- Dunn-Sigouin E, Son SW (2013) Northern Hemisphere blocking frequency and duration in the CMIP5 models. J Geophys Res AtmosGoogle Scholar
- Gillett N, Graf H, Osborn T (2003) Climate change and the North Atlantic Oscillation. Geophys Monogr Ser 134:193–210Google Scholar
- Handorf D, Dethloff K (2012) How well do state-of-the-art atmosphere-ocean general circulation models reproduce atmospheric teleconnection patterns? Tellus A 64(19777):1–27Google Scholar
- Hurrell J, Kushnir Y, Ottersen G, Visbeck M (2003) An overview of the North Atlantic Oscillation. Geophys Monogr Ser 134:1–36Google Scholar
- Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Jenne R, Joseph D (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walker G, Bliss E (1932) World weather V. Meml R Meteorol Soc 134:193–210Google Scholar
- Wang Y-H, Magnusdottir G, Stern H, Tian X, Yu Y (2012) Decadal variability of the NAO: introducing an augmented NAO index. Geophys Res Lett 39(21):L21702Google Scholar
- Woollings T, Hoskins B, Blackburn M, Berrisford P (2008) A new Rossby wave breaking interpretation of the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Atmos Sci 65:326–609Google Scholar