Advertisement

Climate Dynamics

, Volume 43, Issue 1–2, pp 71–85 | Cite as

European blocking and Atlantic jet stream variability in the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis and the CMCC-CMS climate model

  • Paolo DaviniEmail author
  • Chiara Cagnazzo
  • Pier Giuseppe Fogli
  • Elisa Manzini
  • Silvio Gualdi
  • Antonio Navarra
Article

Abstract

The relationship between atmospheric blocking over Europe and the Atlantic eddy-driven jet stream is investigated in the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis and in a climate model. This is carried out using a bidimensional blocking index based on geopotential height and a diagnostic providing daily latitudinal position and strength of the jet stream. It is shown that European Blocking (EB) is not decoupled from the jet stream but it is mainly associated with its poleward displacements. Moreover, the whole blocking area placed on the equatorward side of the jet stream, broadly ranging from Azores up to Scandinavia, emerges as associated with poleward jet displacements. The diagnostics are hence applied to two different climate model simulations in order to evaluate the biases in the jet stream and in the blocking representation. This analysis highlights large underestimation of EB, typical feature of general circulation models. Interestingly, observed blocking and jet biases over the Euro-Atlantic area are consistent with the blocking-jet relationship observed in the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis. Finally, the importance of sea surface temperatures (SSTs) is investigated showing that realistic SSTs can reduce the bias in the jet stream variability but not in the frequency of EB. We conclude highlighting that blocking-related diagnostics can provide more information about the Euro-Atlantic variability than diagnostics simply based on the Atlantic jet stream.

Keywords

Atlantic jet stream European blocking Climate model SSTs 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to deeply thank Stefano Tibaldi, Andrea Alessandri, Fabio D’Andrea and Tim Woollings for the constructive comments and useful suggestions, which have helped improving this manuscript. Special thanks are due to Giuseppe Zappa for the long-lasting and helpful discussions. We acknowledge the WAVACS COST ACTION ES0604 for providing support to Paolo Davini for a STSM to Reading and Oxford. Chiara Cagnazzo was funded by the European Commission’s 7th Framework Programme, under Grant Agreement number 226520, COMBINE project. We gratefully acknowledge the support of Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research and Ministry for Environment, Land and Sea through the project GEMINA.

References

  1. Athanasiadis P, Wallace J, Wettstein J (2010) Patterns of wintertime jet stream variability and their relation to the storm tracks. J Atmos Sci 67(5):1361–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes E, Hartmann D (2010) Influence of eddy-driven jet latitude on North Atlantic jet persistence and blocking frequency in CMIP3 integrations. Geophys Res Lett 37:L23,802Google Scholar
  3. Barnes E, Hartmann D, Frierson D, Kidston J (2010) Effect of latitude on the persistence of eddy-driven jets. Geophys Res Lett 37:L11,804Google Scholar
  4. Barnes E, Slingo J, Woollings T (2011) A methodology for the comparison of blocking climatologies across indices, models and climate scenarios. Clim Dyn:1–15Google Scholar
  5. Barriopedro D, Garcia-Herrera R, Trigo R (2010) Application of blocking diagnosis methods to general circulation models. Part I: a novel detection scheme. Clim Dyn 35(7–8):1373–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benedict J, Lee S, Feldstein S (2004) Synoptic view of the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Atmos Sci 66:121–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berrisford P, Hoskins B, Tyrlis E (2007) Blocking and Rossby wave breaking on the dynamical tropopause in the Southern Hemisphere. J Atmos Sci 64:2881–2898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brayshaw D, Hoskins B, Blackburn M (2008) The storm-track response to idealized sst perturbations in an aquaplanet gcm. J Atmos Sci 65(9):2842–2860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cagnazzo C, Manzini E, Giorgetta M, Foster PD, Morcrette J (2007) Impact of an improved shortwave radiation scheme in the MAECHAM5 general circulation model. Atmos Chem Phys 7:2503–2515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassou C, Terray L, Hurrel J, Deser C (2004) North Atlantic winter climate regimes: spatial asymmetry, stationarity with time, and oceanic forcing. J Clim 17:1055–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Croci-Maspoli M, Schwierz C, Davies H (2007) Atmospheric blocking: space-time links to the NAO and PNA. Clim Dyn 29:713–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. D’Andrea F, Tibaldi S, Blackburn M, Boer G, Deque M, Dix MR, Dugas B, Ferranti L, Iwasaki T, Kitoh A, Pope V, Randall D, Roeckner E, Straus D, Stern W, den Dool HV, Williamson D (1997) Northern Hemisphere atmospheric blocking as simulated by 15 atmospheric general circulation models in the period 1979–1988. Clim Dyn 14:383–407Google Scholar
  13. Davini P, Cagnazzo C, Gualdi S, Navarra A (2012) Bidimensional diagnostics, variability and trends of northern hemisphere blocking. J Clim 25(19):6496–6509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dole R, Gordon N (1983) Persistent anomalies of the extratropical northern hemisphere wintertime circulation: Geographical distribution and regional persistence characteristics. Mon Weather Rev 111(8):1567–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eady E (1949) Long waves and cyclone waves. Tellus 1(3):33–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferranti L, Molteni F, Palmer T (1994) Impact of localized tropical and extratropical sst anomalies in ensembles of seasonal gcm integrations. Q J R Meteorol Soc 120(520):1613–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fichefet T, Morales-Maqueda M (1997) Sensitivity of a global sea ice model to treatment of ice thermodynamics and dynamics. J Geophys Res 102(12):609–646Google Scholar
  18. Fogli PG, Manzini E, Vichi M, Alessandri A, Patara L, Gualdi S, Scoccimarro E, Masina S, Navarra A (2009) INGV-CMCC carbon (ICC): a carbon cycle earth system model. Report 0061, CMCCGoogle Scholar
  19. Franzke C, Lee S, Feldstein S (2004) Is the North Atlantic Oscillation a breaking wave?. J Atmos Sci 61:145–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoskins B, Valdes P (1990) On the existence of storm-tracks. J Atmos Sci 47:1854–1864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hurrel J, Kushnir Y, Ottersen G, Visbeck M (2003) An overview of the North Atlantic Oscillation. Geophys Union Am Geophys Union 134:1–36Google Scholar
  22. Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Jenne R, Joseph D (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keeley S, Sutton R, Shaffrey L (2012) The impact of north atlantic sea surface temperature errors on the simulation of north atlantic european region climate. Q J R Meteorol Soc 138(668):1774–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kidston J, Vallis G (2010) Relationship between eddy-driven jet latitude and width. Geophys Res Lett 37:L21,809Google Scholar
  25. Kunz T, Fraedrich K, Lunkeit F (2009) Impact of synoptic-scale wave breaking on the NAO and its connection with the stratosphere in ERA-40. J Clim 22(20):5464–5480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kunz T, Fraedrich K, Lunkeit F (2009) Synoptic scale wave breaking and its potential to drive NAO-like circulation dipoles: a simplified GCM approach. Q J R Meteorol Soc 135:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Madec G, Delecluse P, Imbard M, Levy C (1998) OPA8.1 Ocean general circulation model reference manual. Ipsl technical report, IPSLGoogle Scholar
  28. Manzini E, Giorgetta M, Esch M, Kornblueh K, Roeckner E (2006) The influence of sea surface temperatures on the Northern winter stratosphere: ensemble simulations with the MAECHAM5 model. J Clim 19(20):3863–3881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manzini E, Cagnazzo C, Fogli P, Bellucci A, Muller W (2012) Stratosphere-troposphere coupling at inter-decadal timescales: Implications for the north atlantic ocean. Geophys Res Lett 39:L05801Google Scholar
  30. McIntyre ME, Palmer T (1983) Breaking planetary waves in the stratosphere. Nature 305:593–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Michel C, Riviere G (2013) Sensitivity of the position and variability of the eddy-driven jet to different sst profiles in an aquaplanet general circulation model. J Atmos Sci (submitted)Google Scholar
  32. Michelangeli P, Vautard R, Legras B (1995) Weather regimes: recurrence and quasi stationarity. J Atmos Sci 52(8):1237–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nakamura H, Sampe T, Tanimoto Y, Shimpo A (2004) Observed associations among storm tracks, jet streams and midlatitude oceanic fronts. Geophys Monogr Ser 147:329–345Google Scholar
  34. Pelly J, Hoskins B (2003) A new perspective on blocking. J Atmos Sci 60:743–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peters D, Waugh D (1996) Influence of barotropic shear on the poleward advection of upper-tropospheric air. J Atmos Sci 53:3013–3031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rayner N, Parker D, Horton E, Folland C, Alexander L, Rowell D, Kent E, Kaplan A (2003) Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J Geophys Res 108(D14):4407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rex D (1950) Blocking action in the middle troposphere and its effect upon regional climate: I. An aerological study of blocking action. Int J Climatol 2:169–211Google Scholar
  38. Riviere G, Orlanski I (2007) Characteristics of the Atlantic storm-track eddy activity and its relation with the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Atmos Sci 64:241–266.Google Scholar
  39. Roeckner E, Brokopf R, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Hagemann S, Kornblueh L, Manzini E, Schlese U, Schulzweida U (2006) Sensitivity of simulated climate to horizontal and vertical resolution in the ECHAM5 atmosphere model. J Clim 19:3771–3790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sampe T, Nakamura H, Goto A, Ohfuchi W (2010) Significance of a midlatitude sst frontal zone in the formation of a storm track and an eddy-driven westerly jet. J Clim 23(7):1793–1814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scaife A, Woollings T, Knight J, Martin G, Hinton T (2010) Atmospheric blocking and mean biases in climate models. J Clim 23:6143–6152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scaife A, Copsey D, Gordon C, Harris C, Hinton T, Keeley S, O’Neill A, Roberts M, Williams K (2011) Improved atlantic winter blocking in a climate model. Geophys Res Lett 38(23):L23,703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scherrer S, Croci-Maspoli M, Schwierz C, Appenzeller C (2006) Two-dimensional indices of atmospheric blocking and their statistical relationship with winter climate patterns in the Euro-Atlantic region. Int J Climatol 26:233–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Strong C, Davis R (2008) Variability in the position and strength of winter jet stream cores related to Northern Hemisphere teleconnections. J Clim 21:584–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thorncroft C, Hoskins B, McIntyire M (1993) Two paradigms of baroclinic wave life-cycle behaviour. Q J R Meteorol Soc 119:17–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tibaldi S, Molteni F (1990) On the operational predictability of blocking. Tellus 42:343–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tyrlis E, Hoskins B (2008) Aspects of a Northern Hemisphere atmospheric blocking climatology. J Atmos Sci 65:1638–1652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Valcke S (2006) OASIS3 user guide. Prism Report Series 2, CERFACSGoogle Scholar
  49. Vallis G (2006) Atmospheric and oceanic fluid dynamics: fundamentals and large-scale circulation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Vautard R (1990) Multiple weather regimes over the north atlantic analysis of precursors and successors. Mon Weather Rev 118(10):2056–2081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Woollings T, Hoskins B, Blackburn M, Berrisford P (2008) A new rossby wave breaking interpretation of the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Atmos Sci 65:609–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Woollings T, Hannachi A, Hoskins B (2010a) Variability of the North Atlantic eddy-driven jet stream. Q J R Meteorol Soc 136:856–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Woollings T, Hannachi A, Hoskins B, Turner A (2010b) A regime view of the North Atlantic Oscillation and its response to anthropogenic forcing. J Clim 23:1291–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Woollings T, Pinto J, Santos J (2011) Dynamical evolution of North Atlantic ridges and poleward jet stream displacements. J Atmos Sci 68:954–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Davini
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Chiara Cagnazzo
    • 4
  • Pier Giuseppe Fogli
    • 1
  • Elisa Manzini
    • 5
  • Silvio Gualdi
    • 1
    • 6
  • Antonio Navarra
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici (CMCC)BolognaItaly
  2. 2.Ca’ Foscari UniversityVeneziaItaly
  3. 3.Istituto di Scienze dell′Atmosfera e del Clima (ISAC-CNR)TorinoItaly
  4. 4.ISAC-CNRRomaItaly
  5. 5.Max Plank Institute for MeteorologyHamburgGermany
  6. 6.Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e VulcanologiaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations