Understanding the sources of Caribbean precipitation biases in CMIP3 and CMIP5 simulations
- 536 Downloads
We assess the ability of Global Climate Models participating in phases 3 and 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP3 and CMIP5) to simulate observed annual precipitation cycles over the Caribbean. Compared to weather station records and gridded observations, we find that both CMIP3 and CMIP5 models can be grouped into three categories: (1) models that correctly simulate a bimodal distribution with two rainfall maxima in May–June and September–October, punctuated by a mid-summer drought (MSD) in July–August; (2) models that reproduce the MSD and the second precipitation maxima only; and (3) models that simulate only one precipitation maxima, beginning in early summer. These categories appear related to model simulation of the North Atlantic Subtropical High (NASH) and sea surface temperature (SST) in the Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico. Specifically, models in category 2 tend to anticipate the westward expansion of the NASH into the Caribbean in early summer. Early onset of NASH results in strong moisture divergence and MSD-like conditions at the time of the May–June observed precipitation maxima. Models in category 3 tend to have cooler SST across the region, particularly over the central Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico, as well as a weaker Caribbean low-level jet accompanying a weaker NASH. In these models, observed June-like patterns of moisture convergence in the central Caribbean and the Central America and divergence in the east Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico persist through September. This analysis suggests systematic biases in model structure may be responsible for biases in observed precipitation variability over the Caribbean and more confidence may be placed in the precipitation simulated by the GCMs that are able to correctly simulate seasonal cycles of SST and NASH.
KeywordsCaribbean precipitation North Atlantic subtropical high Caribbean low-level jet Global climate models Large-scale dynamics
The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive suggestions that improved this manuscript. We also thank Mr. Caleb Crow for quality control of station data. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modeling groups (listed in Table 1 of this paper) for producing and making available their model output. For CMIP the U.S. Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals. This research was supported by USGS Award Number G10AC00582.
- Adler RF, Huffman GJ, Chang A, Ferraro R, Xie P, Janowiak J, Rudolf B, Schnerider U, Curtis S, Bolvin D, Gruber A, Susskind J, Arkin P (2003) The version 2 global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979-present). J Hydrometeorol 4:1147–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Amador J (1998) A climatic feature of the tropical Americas: the trade wind easterly jet. Top Meteor Oceanogr 5:1–13Google Scholar
- Covey C, AchutaRao KM, Cubasch U, Jones P, Lambert S, Mann M, Phillips T and Taylor K (2003) An overview of results from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). Glob Planet Chang 103–133Google Scholar
- Curtis S, Gamble DW (2007) Regional variations of the Caribbean mid-summer drought. Theor Appl Climatol. doi: 10.1007/s00704-007-0342-0
- Gamble DW, Curtis S (2008) Caribbean precipitation: review, model, and prospect. Prog Phys Geogr 32(3):265–276Google Scholar
- Kelly P and Mapes B (2011) Zonal mean wind, the Indian monsoon, and July drying in the western Atlantic subtropics. J Geophys Res 116:D00Q07. doi: 10.1029/2010JD015405
- Nakicenovic N, Swart R (eds) (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenario. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar