How well are daily intense rainfall events captured by current climate models over Africa?
- 971 Downloads
The ability of state-of-the-art climate models to capture the mean spatial and temporal characteristics of daily intense rainfall events over Africa is evaluated by analyzing regional climate model (RCM) simulations at 90- and 30-km along with output from four atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs) and coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) of the Climate Model Intercomparison Project 5. Daily intense rainfall events are extracted at grid point scale using a 95th percentile threshold approach applied to all rainy days (i.e., daily rainfall ≥1 mm day−1) over the 1998–2008 period for which two satellite-derived precipitation products are available. Both RCM simulations provide similar results. They accurately capture the spatial and temporal characteristics of intense events, while they tend to overestimate their number and underestimate their intensity. The skill of AGCMs and AOGCMs is generally similar over the African continent and similar to previous global climate model generations. The majority of the AGCMs and AOGCMs greatly overestimate the frequency of intense events, particularly in the tropics, generally fail at simulating the observed intensity, and systematically overestimate their spatial coverage. The RCM performs at least as well as the most accurate global climate model, demonstrating a clear added value to general circulation model simulations and the usefulness of regional modeling for investigating the physics leading to intense events and their change under global warming.
KeywordsAfrica CMIP5 AGCMs/AOGCMs Daily intense rainfall Regional climate model
Support from the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science (award DE-FG02-10ER65092) is gratefully acknowledged. WRF was provided by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/download/get_source.html). Simulations are performed on the high performance computing platform at the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) at the University of Texas at Austin. We also gratefully acknowledge the GCM modeling groups, the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI), and the World Climate Research Program’s Working Group on Coupled Modeling (WGCM) for their roles in making available the WCRP CMIP5 multi-model dataset. Support of this dataset is provided by the Office of Science, U. S. Department of Energy. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
- Aguilar E, Barry AA, Brunet M, Ekang L, Fernandes A, Massoukina M, Mbah J, Mhanda A, do Nascimento DJ, Peterson TC, Thamba Umba O, Tomou M, Zhang X (2009) Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in western central Africa, Guinea Conakry, and Zimbabwe, 1955–2006. J Geophys Res Atmos 114:D02115. doi: 10.1029/2008JD011010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boyle J, Klein SA (2010) Impact of horizontal resolution on climate model forecasts of tropical precipitation and diabatic heating for the TWP-ICE period, J Geophys Res 115. doi: 101029/2010JD014262
- Crétat J (2011) Rainfall and atmospheric circulation simulated by the WRF regional climate model in Southern Africa: sensitivity to the physics and internal variability. University of Burgundy, PhD dissertationGoogle Scholar
- Huffman GJ, Bolvin DT (2013) TRMM and other data precipitation data set documentation. ftp://rsd.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/trmmdocs/3B42_3B43_doc.pdf
- Jones C, Giorgi F, Asrar G (2011) The Coordinated regional downscaling experiment: CORDEX. An international downscaling link to CMIP5. CLIVAR Exch 16:34–40Google Scholar
- Klein Tank AMG, Zwiers FW, Zhang X (2009) Climate data and monitoring WCDMP-705 NO. 72, WMO-TD No. 1500, 56 ppGoogle Scholar
- Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao ZC (2007) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- New M, Hewitson B, Stephenson DB, Tsiga A, Kruger A, Manhique A, Gomez B, Coelho CAS, Masisi DN, Kululanga E, Mbambalala E, Adesina F, Saleh H, Kanyanga J, Adosi J, Bulane L, Fortunata L, Mdoka ML, Lajoie R (2006) Evidence of trends in daily climate extremes over southern and West Africa. J Geophys Res Atmos 111, doi: 10.1029/2005JD006289
- Nicholson SE, Some B, McCollum J, Nelkin E, Klotter D, Berte Y, Diallo BM, Gaye I, Kpabeba G, Ndiaye O, Noukpozounkou JN, Tanu MM, Thiam A, Toure AA, Traore AK (2003) Validation of TRMM and other rainfall estimates with a high-density gauge dataset for West Africa. Part I: validation of GPCC rainfall product and Pre-TRMM satellite and blended products. J Appl Meteorol 42:1337–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nikulin G, Jones C, Giorgi F, Asrar G, Buchner M, Cerezo-Mota R, Christensen OB, Déqué M, Fernandez J, Hansler A, van Meijgaard E, Samuelsson P, Sylla MB, Sushama L (2012) Precipitation climatology in an ensemble of CORDEX-Africa regional climate simulations. J Clim 25:6057–6078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Randall DA, Wood RA, Bony S, Colman R, Fichefet T, Fyfe J, Kattsov V, Pitman A, Shukla J, Srinivasan J, Stouffer RJ, Sumi A, Taylor KE (2007) Climate models and their evaluation. In: Solomon, S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- Skamarock W, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill D, Barker D, Duda M, Huang X, Wang W, Powers J (2008) A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN\u2013475? STR, 123 pp. http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/docs/arw_v3.pdf
- Wilks DS (2011) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. Academic Press, 3rd edn. ISBN 978-0-12-385022-5Google Scholar