ENSO representation in climate models: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
- 6k Downloads
We analyse the ability of CMIP3 and CMIP5 coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation models (CGCMs) to simulate the tropical Pacific mean state and El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). The CMIP5 multi-model ensemble displays an encouraging 30 % reduction of the pervasive cold bias in the western Pacific, but no quantum leap in ENSO performance compared to CMIP3. CMIP3 and CMIP5 can thus be considered as one large ensemble (CMIP3 + CMIP5) for multi-model ENSO analysis. The too large diversity in CMIP3 ENSO amplitude is however reduced by a factor of two in CMIP5 and the ENSO life cycle (location of surface temperature anomalies, seasonal phase locking) is modestly improved. Other fundamental ENSO characteristics such as central Pacific precipitation anomalies however remain poorly represented. The sea surface temperature (SST)-latent heat flux feedback is slightly improved in the CMIP5 ensemble but the wind-SST feedback is still underestimated by 20–50 % and the shortwave-SST feedbacks remain underestimated by a factor of two. The improvement in ENSO amplitudes might therefore result from error compensations. The ability of CMIP models to simulate the SST-shortwave feedback, a major source of erroneous ENSO in CGCMs, is further detailed. In observations, this feedback is strongly nonlinear because the real atmosphere switches from subsident (positive feedback) to convective (negative feedback) regimes under the effect of seasonal and interannual variations. Only one-third of CMIP3 + CMIP5 models reproduce this regime shift, with the other models remaining locked in one of the two regimes. The modelled shortwave feedback nonlinearity increases with ENSO amplitude and the amplitude of this feedback in the spring strongly relates with the models ability to simulate ENSO phase locking. In a final stage, a subset of metrics is proposed in order to synthesize the ability of each CMIP3 and CMIP5 models to simulate ENSO main characteristics and key atmospheric feedbacks.
KeywordsCMIP5 Model Zonal Wind Stress CMIP5 Ensemble ENSO Amplitude Atmospheric Feedback
We acknowledge the support from the European Union EUCLIPSE project (ENV/244067, FP7), the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche projects ANR-10-Blanc-616 METRO. We also acknowledge the CMIP3 and CMIP5 modelling groups, the ESG and PRODIGUER data distribution systems. We thank the two anonymous reviewers who helped to improve this manuscript.
- Dommenget D, Haase S, Bayr T, Frauen C (2013) Analysis of the slab ocean El Niño atmospheric feedbacks in observed and simulated ENSO dynamics. Clim Dyn (submitted)Google Scholar
- Dufresne JL, et al (2013) Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5. Clim DynGoogle Scholar
- Guilyardi E, Wittenberg A (2010) ENSO and tropical Pacific metrics for CMIP5. IPCC Expert meeting on Assessing and Combining Multi Model Climate Projections, Boulder, USA, January 2010Google Scholar
- Wang C, Picaut J (2004) Understanding ENSO physics: a review. Geophys Monogr AGU 147:21–48Google Scholar
- Wittenberg AT, Rosati T, Held I (2003) ENSO in the GFDL coupled model. Eighth Annual CCSM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO, UCAR. Available online at http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/atw/research/conf/ccsm8/talk.pdf
- Xie S-P (2005) The shape of continents, air-sea interaction, and the rising branch of the Hadley circulation. The Hadley circulation: present, past and future. In Diaz HF, Bradley RS (eds) Advances in global change research, vol 21. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 121–152Google Scholar
- Yu J-Y, Kim ST (2010) Identification of Central-Pacific and Eastern-Pacific types of ENSO in CMIP3 models. Geophys Res Lett 37:L15705Google Scholar