The global energy balance from a surface perspective
- 4k Downloads
In the framework of the global energy balance, the radiative energy exchanges between Sun, Earth and space are now accurately quantified from new satellite missions. Much less is known about the magnitude of the energy flows within the climate system and at the Earth surface, which cannot be directly measured by satellites. In addition to satellite observations, here we make extensive use of the growing number of surface observations to constrain the global energy balance not only from space, but also from the surface. We combine these observations with the latest modeling efforts performed for the 5th IPCC assessment report to infer best estimates for the global mean surface radiative components. Our analyses favor global mean downward surface solar and thermal radiation values near 185 and 342 Wm−2, respectively, which are most compatible with surface observations. Combined with an estimated surface absorbed solar radiation and thermal emission of 161 and 397 Wm−2, respectively, this leaves 106 Wm−2 of surface net radiation available globally for distribution amongst the non-radiative surface energy balance components. The climate models overestimate the downward solar and underestimate the downward thermal radiation, thereby simulating nevertheless an adequate global mean surface net radiation by error compensation. This also suggests that, globally, the simulated surface sensible and latent heat fluxes, around 20 and 85 Wm−2 on average, state realistic values. The findings of this study are compiled into a new global energy balance diagram, which may be able to reconcile currently disputed inconsistencies between energy and water cycle estimates.
KeywordsEarth Radiation Budget Surface energy balance Global climate models Global energy balance Surface/Satellite observations CMIP5/IPCC-AR5 model evaluation
This study is supported by the National Centre for Competence in Climate Research (NCCR Climate) of the Swiss National Science Foundation as part of the NCCR Project HyClim. We are grateful to Prof. Atsumu Ohmura for numerous discussions and for his leadership in the establishment of GEBA and BSRN. We highly acknowledge Barbara Schär for the design of the global energy balance figure. We would like to thank Dr. Guido Muller for processing the BSRN data and Dr. Urs Beyerle and Dr. Thierry Corti for all their efforts to download the immense CMIP5 dataset. We acknowledge the international modeling groups for providing their data for analysis, the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) for collecting and archiving the model data, the JSC/CLIVAR Working Group on Coupled Modelling (WGCM) and their Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) and Climate Simulation Panel for organizing the model data analysis activity, and the IPCC WG1 TSU for technical support. The IPCC Data Archive at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is supported by the Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy. We would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge many hard working site scientists, as listed in http://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.40092.d001. BSRN data used in this study are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.792618. We dedicate this study to our dear friend and colleague Ellsworth G. Dutton, who passed away the day this paper was accepted. His enthusiasm and devotion as BSRN project manager over 20 years was invaluable for the success of BSRN.
- Kato S, Rose F, Sun-Mack S, Miller W, Chen Y, Rutan D, Stephens G, Loeb N, Minnis P, Wielicki B, Winker D, Charlock T, Stackhouse P, Xu K, Collins W (2011) Improvements of top-of-atmosphere and surface irradiance computations with calipso-, cloudsat-, and modis-derived cloud and aerosol properties. J Geophys Res 116:D19209. doi: 10.1029/2011JD016050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kato S, Loeb NG, Rose FG, Doelling DR, Rutan DA, Caldwell TE, Yu L, Weller R. Surface irradiances consistent with CERES-derived top-of-atmosphere shortwave and longwave irradiances. J Clim (in press)Google Scholar
- Markovic M, Jones CG, Vaillancourt PA, Paquin D, Winger K, Paquin-Ricard D (2008) An evaluation of the surface radiation budget over North America for a suite of regional climate models against surface station observations. Clim Dyn 31(7–8):779–794. doi: 10.1007/s00382-008-0378-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Michalsky J, Dutton EG, Nelson D, Wendell J, Wilcox S, Andreas A, Gotseff P, Myers D, Reda I, Stoffel T, Behrens K, Carlund T, Finsterle W, Halliwell D (2011) An extensive comparison of commercial pyrheliometers under a wide range of routine observing conditions. J Atmos Ocean Tech 28(6):752–766. doi: 10.1175/2010jtecha1518.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ohmura A, Gilgen H, Wild M (1989) Global energy balance archive GEBA, world climate program—water project a7. Zuercher Geografische Schriften 34. ZuerichGoogle Scholar
- Ohmura A, Dutton EG, Forgan B, Frohlich C, Gilgen H, Hegner H, Heimo A, Konig-Langlo G, McArthur B, Muller G, Philipona R, Pinker R, Whitlock CH, Dehne K, Wild M (1998) Baseline surface radiation network (bsrn/wcrp): new precision radiometry for climate research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79(10):2115–2136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Philipona R, Dutton EG, Stoffel T, Michalsky J, Reda I, Stifter A, Wendling P, Wood N, Clough SA, Mlawer EJ, Anderson G, Revercomb HE, Shippert TR (2001) Atmospheric longwave irradiance uncertainty: pyrgeometers compared to an absolute sky-scanning radiometer, atmospheric emitted radiance interferometer, and radiative transfer model calculations. J Geophys Res Atmos 106(D22):28129–28141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Uppala SM, Kallberg PW, Simmons AJ, Andrae U, Bechtold VD, Fiorino M, Gibson JK, Haseler J, Hernandez A, Kelly GA, Li X, Onogi K, Saarinen S, Sokka N, Allan RP, Andersson E, Arpe K, Balmaseda MA, Beljaars ACM, Van De Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Caires S, Chevallier F, Dethof A, Dragosavac M, Fisher M, Fuentes M, Hagemann S, Holm E, Hoskins BJ, Isaksen L, Janssen PAEM, Jenne R, McNally AP, Mahfouf JF, Morcrette JJ, Rayner NA, Saunders RW, Simon P, Sterl A, Trenberth KE, Untch A, Vasiljevic D, Viterbo P, Woollen J (2005) The ERA-40 re-analysis. Q J Royal Meteorol Soc 131(612):2961–3012. doi: 10.1256/Qj.04.176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wild M, Grieser J, Schaer C (2008) Combined surface solar brightening and increasing greenhouse effect support recent intensification of the global land-based hydrological cycle. Geophys Res Lett 35(17):L17706. doi: 10.1029/2008gl034842
- Zhang YC, Rossow WB, Lacis AA, Oinas V, Mishchenko MI (2004) Calculation of radiative fluxes from the surface to top of atmosphere based on ISCCP and other global data sets: refinements of the radiative transfer model and the input data. J Geophys Res Atmos 109(D19):D19105. doi: 10.1029/2003jd004457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar