Intercomparison between observed and simulated variability in global ocean heat content using empirical mode decomposition, part I: modulated annual cycle
This study proposes a new more precise and detailed method to examine the performance of IPCC AR4 models in simulation of nonlinear variability of global ocean heat content (OHC) on the annual time scale during 1950–1999. The method is based on the intercomparison of modulated annual cycle (MAC) of OHC and its instantaneous frequency (IF), derived by Empirical Mode Decomposition and Hilbert-Huang Transformation. In addition to indicate the general agreement in gross features globally between models and observation, our results point out the problems both in observation and in modeling. In the well observed Northern Hemisphere, models exhibit extremely good skills to capture nonlinear annual variability of OHC. The simulated MACs are highly correlated with observations (>0.95) and the IF of MACs varies coherently with each other. However, in sparsely observed Southern Hemisphere (SH), even though the simulated MACs highly correlate with observations, the IF shows significant difference. This comparisons show that the models exhibit coherent variability of IF of MACs in SH with each other, but not with observations, revealing the problems in the objective analyzed dataset using sparse observations. In the well observed tropic region, the models lack the coherence with the observations, indicating inadequate physics of the models in the tropical area. These results illustrate that the proposed method can be used routinely to identify problems in both models and in observation of the global ocean as a critical component of global climate change.
KeywordsOcean heat content Modulated annual cycle Empirical mode decomposition Instantaneous frequency Instantaneous amplitude CMIP3
This works was supported by National Science Foundation of China 41176029 and 41106033, Public science and technology research funds projects of ocean 201105019, and Chinese Polar Research Project CHINARE2012-04-04. ZW and NEH were supported by a grant from Federal Highway Administration, DTFH61-08-00028, and grants from NSC, NSC95-2119-M-008-031-MY3, NSC97-2627-B-008-007, and a grant from NCU 965941.
- Huang NE, Wu Z (2008) A review on Hilbert-Huang transform: method and its applications to geophysical studies. Rev Geophys 46:RG2006Google Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, p 996Google Scholar
- Knutti R, Abramowitz G, Collins M, Eyring V, Gleckler PJ, Hewitson B, Mearns L (2010) Good practice guidance paper on assessing and combining multi model climate projections. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) Meeting Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Expert Meeting on Assessing and Combining Multi Model Climate Projections. IPCC Working Group I Technical Support Unit, University of Bern, BernGoogle Scholar
- Levitus S, Boyer TP, Conkright ME, O’Brien T, Antonov J, Stephens C, Stathoplos L, Johnson D, Gelfeld R (1998) World Ocean Database 1998, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 18. NOAA, Silver SpringGoogle Scholar
- Locarnini RA, Mishonov AV, Antonov JI, Boyer TP, Garcia HE, Baranova OK, Zweng MM, Johnson DR (2010) World Ocean Atlas 2009, volume 1: temperature. In: Levitus S (ed) NOAA Atlas NESDIS 68. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., p 184Google Scholar
- Pincus R, Batstone CP, Hofmann RJP, Taylor KE, Glecker PJ (2008) Evaluating the present day simulation of clouds, precipitation, and radiation in climate models. J Geophys Res 113:D14209. doi:10.1029/2007JD009334
- Talley LD, Pickard GL, Emery WJ, Swift JH (2011) Descriptive physical oceanography, an introduction. ELSEVIER Press, NYGoogle Scholar