Climate Dynamics

, Volume 41, Issue 11–12, pp 2797–2815 | Cite as

Intercomparison between observed and simulated variability in global ocean heat content using empirical mode decomposition, part I: modulated annual cycle

  • Xianyao Chen
  • Yuanling Zhang
  • Min Zhang
  • Ying Feng
  • Zhaohua Wu
  • Fangli Qiao
  • Norden Eh Huang
Article

Abstract

This study proposes a new more precise and detailed method to examine the performance of IPCC AR4 models in simulation of nonlinear variability of global ocean heat content (OHC) on the annual time scale during 1950–1999. The method is based on the intercomparison of modulated annual cycle (MAC) of OHC and its instantaneous frequency (IF), derived by Empirical Mode Decomposition and Hilbert-Huang Transformation. In addition to indicate the general agreement in gross features globally between models and observation, our results point out the problems both in observation and in modeling. In the well observed Northern Hemisphere, models exhibit extremely good skills to capture nonlinear annual variability of OHC. The simulated MACs are highly correlated with observations (>0.95) and the IF of MACs varies coherently with each other. However, in sparsely observed Southern Hemisphere (SH), even though the simulated MACs highly correlate with observations, the IF shows significant difference. This comparisons show that the models exhibit coherent variability of IF of MACs in SH with each other, but not with observations, revealing the problems in the objective analyzed dataset using sparse observations. In the well observed tropic region, the models lack the coherence with the observations, indicating inadequate physics of the models in the tropical area. These results illustrate that the proposed method can be used routinely to identify problems in both models and in observation of the global ocean as a critical component of global climate change.

Keywords

Ocean heat content Modulated annual cycle Empirical mode decomposition Instantaneous frequency Instantaneous amplitude CMIP3 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This works was supported by National Science Foundation of China 41176029 and 41106033, Public science and technology research funds projects of ocean 201105019, and Chinese Polar Research Project CHINARE2012-04-04. ZW and NEH were supported by a grant from Federal Highway Administration, DTFH61-08-00028, and grants from NSC, NSC95-2119-M-008-031-MY3, NSC97-2627-B-008-007, and a grant from NCU 965941.

Supplementary material

382_2012_1554_MOESM1_ESM.docx (71 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 72 kb)

References

  1. Antonov JI, Levitus S, Boyer TP (2004) Climatological annual cycle of ocean heat content. Geophys Res Lett 31(4):L04304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett TP, Pierce DW, Schnur R (2001) Detection of anthropogenic climate change in the world’s oceans. Science 292:270–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell TL, Kundu PK (2000) Dependence of satellite sampling error on monthly averaged rain rates: comparison of simple models and recent studies. J Clim 13:449–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen XY, Wu ZH, Huang NE (2010) The time-dependent intrinsic correlation based on the empirical mode decomposition. Adv Adap Data Anal 2:233–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fedorov AV, Philander SG (2000) Is El Nino changing? Science 288:1997–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gleckler P, Sperber KR, AchutaRao K (2006) Annual cycle of global ocean heat content: observed and simulated. J Geophys Res 111:C06008. doi:10.1029/2005JC003223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gleckler P, Taylor K, Doutriaux C (2008) Performance metrics for climate models. J Geophys Res 113:D06104. doi:10.1029/2007JD008972 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gregory JM, Banks HT, Stott PA, Lowe JA, Palmer MD (2004) Simulated and observed decadal variability in ocean heat content. Geophys Res Lett 31:L15312. doi:10.1029/2004GL020258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gu D, Philander SG, McPhaden MJ (1997) The seasonal cycle and its modulation in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 27:2209–2218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansen J, Nazarenko L, Ruedy R, Sato M, Willis J, Del Genio A, Koch D, Lacis A, Lo K, Menon S (2005) Earth’s energy imbalance: confirmation and implications. Science 308:1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hsu CP, Wallace JM (1976) The global distribution of the annual and semiannual cycles in precipitation. Mon Weather Rev 104:1093–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang NE, Wu Z (2008) A review on Hilbert-Huang transform: method and its applications to geophysical studies. Rev Geophys 46:RG2006Google Scholar
  13. Huang N, Shen Z, Long S, Wu M, Shih H, Zheng Q, Yen N, Tung C, Liu H (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc Lond 454:903–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang NE, Wu Z, Long SR, Arnold KC, Chen X, Blank K (2009) On instantaneous frequency. Adv Adap Data Anal 1:177–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingleby B, Huddleston M (2007) Quality control of ocean temperature and salinity profiles—historical and real-time data. J Mar Sys 65:158–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, p 996Google Scholar
  17. Ishii M, Kimoto M, Sakamoto K, Iwasaki S-I (2006) Steric sea level changes estimated from historical ocean subsurface temperature and salinity analyses. J Oceanogr 62:155–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kiktev D, Caesar J, Alexander LV, Shiogama H, Collier M (2007) Comparison of observed and multimodeled trends in annual extremes of temperature and precipitation. Geophys Res Lett 34:L10702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirtman BP, Fan Y, Schneider EK (2002) The COLA global coupled and anomaly coupled ocean–atmosphere GCM. J Clim 15:2301–2320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knutti R, Abramowitz G, Collins M, Eyring V, Gleckler PJ, Hewitson B, Mearns L (2010) Good practice guidance paper on assessing and combining multi model climate projections. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) Meeting Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Expert Meeting on Assessing and Combining Multi Model Climate Projections. IPCC Working Group I Technical Support Unit, University of Bern, BernGoogle Scholar
  21. Levitus S, Boyer TP, Conkright ME, O’Brien T, Antonov J, Stephens C, Stathoplos L, Johnson D, Gelfeld R (1998) World Ocean Database 1998, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 18. NOAA, Silver SpringGoogle Scholar
  22. Levitus S, Antonov JI, Wang J, Delworth TL, Dixon KW, Broccoli AJ (2001) Anthropogenic warming of Earth’s climate system. Science 292:267–270. doi:10.1126/science.1058154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levitus S, Antonov JI, Bouer TP, Locarnini RA, Garcia HE, Mishonov AV (2009) Global ocean heat content 1955–2008 in light of recently revealed instrumentation problems. Geophys Res Lett 36:L07608. doi:10.1029/2008GL037155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Locarnini RA, Mishonov AV, Antonov JI, Boyer TP, Garcia HE, Baranova OK, Zweng MM, Johnson DR (2010) World Ocean Atlas 2009, volume 1: temperature. In: Levitus S (ed) NOAA Atlas NESDIS 68. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., p 184Google Scholar
  25. Lyman JM, Good SA, Gouretski VV, Ishii M, Johnson GC, Palmer MD, Smith DM, Willis JK (2010) Robust warming of the global upper ocean. Nature 465:334–337. doi:10.1038/nature09043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meehl GA, Boer GJ, Covey C, Latif M, Stouffer RJ (2000) The coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP). Bull Amer Meteor Soc 81:313–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meehl GA, Covey C, McAvaney B, Latif M, Stouffer RJ (2005) Overview of the coupled model intercomparison project. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 86:89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pezzulli S, Stephenson DB, Hannachi A (2005) The variability of seasonality. J Clim 18:71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pincus R, Batstone CP, Hofmann RJP, Taylor KE, Glecker PJ (2008) Evaluating the present day simulation of clouds, precipitation, and radiation in climate models. J Geophys Res 113:D14209. doi:10.1029/2007JD009334
  30. Reichert BK, Schnur R, Bengtsson L (2002) Global ocean warming tied to anthropogenic forcing. Geophys Res Lett 29:1525. doi:10.1029/2001GL013954 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reichler T, Kim J (2008) How well do coupled models simulate today’s climate? Bull Amer Meteor Soc 89(3):303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sun S, Hansen JE (2003) Climate simulations for 1951–2050 with a coupled atmosphere-ocean model. J Clim 16:2807–2826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Talley LD, Pickard GL, Emery WJ, Swift JH (2011) Descriptive physical oceanography, an introduction. ELSEVIER Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  34. Wu Z, Huang NE (2009) Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise-assisted data analysis method. Adv Adap Data Anal 1:1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu Z, Schneider EK, Kirtman BP, Sarachik ES, Huang NE, Tucker CJ (2008) The modulated annual cycle: an alternative reference frame for climate anomalies. Clim Dyn 31:823–841. doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0437-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xue Y, Balmaseda MA, Boyer TP, Ferry N, Good SA, Ishikawa I, Kumar A, Rienecker M, Rosati AJ, Yin Y (2012) A comparative analysis of upper ocean heat content variability from an ensemble of operational ocean reanalyses J Clim 25:6905–6929. doi:10.1171/JCLO-D-11-00542.1 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xianyao Chen
    • 1
  • Yuanling Zhang
    • 1
  • Min Zhang
    • 1
  • Ying Feng
    • 1
  • Zhaohua Wu
    • 2
  • Fangli Qiao
    • 1
  • Norden Eh Huang
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Data Analysis and Applications, The First Institute of OceanographyState Oceanic AdministrationQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  3. 3.National Central UniversityChung-LiTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations