Advertisement

Climate Dynamics

, Volume 40, Issue 11–12, pp 2801–2812 | Cite as

Multidecadal simulation of coastal fog with a regional climate model

  • Travis A. O’Brien
  • Lisa C. Sloan
  • Patrick Y. Chuang
  • Ian C. Faloona
  • James A. Johnstone
Article

Abstract

In order to model stratocumulus clouds and coastal fog, we have coupled the University of Washington boundary layer model to the regional climate model, RegCM (RegCM-UW). By comparing fog occurrences observed at various coastal airports in the western United States, we show that RegCM-UW has success at modeling the spatial and temporal (diurnal, seasonal, and interannual) climatology of northern California coastal fog. The quality of the modeled fog estimate depends on whether coast-adjacent ocean or land grid cells are used; for the model runs shown here, the oceanic grid cells seem to be most appropriate. The interannual variability of oceanic northern California summertime fog, from a multi-decadal simulation, has a high and statistically significant correlation with the observed interannual variability (r = 0.72), which indicates that RegCM-UW is capable of investigating the response of fog to long-term climatological forcing. While RegCM-UW has a number of aspects that would benefit from further investigation and development, RegCM-UW is a new tool for investigating the climatology of coastal fog and the physical processes that govern it. We expect that with appropriate physical parameterizations and moderate horizontal resolution, other climate models should be capable of simulating coastal fog. The source code for RegCM-UW is publicly available, under the GNU license, through the International Centre for Theoretical Physics.

Keywords

Regional climate model Marine stratocumulus Planetary boundary layer Cloud topped boundary layer Turbulence closure Coastal climate Coastal fog Sequoia sempervirens Redwood 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their deep gratitude to Professor Christopher Bretherton of the University of Washington for kindly sharing his turbulence closure model code with us. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers, whose thorough comments and suggestions improved the focus and clarity of this manuscript, and Professor Filippo Giorgi, who has kindly provided travel support for the lead author to work with the RegCM developers at ICTP on two occasions. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. ATM-0533482-001 and ATM-0736046-001. This work was partially supported by a grant from the California Energy Commission and a grant from the UC Santa Cruz STEPS Institute. This research was partially supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 as part of the Regional and Global Climate Modeling Program (RGCM). Figures were prepared using the NCAR Command Language (NCL 2012).

References

  1. Bretherton CS, McCaa JR, Grenier H (2004) A new parameterization for shallow cumulus convection and its application to marine subtropical cloud-topped boundary layers. Mon Wea Rev 132(4):864–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burk SD, Thompson WT (1996) The summertime low-level jet and marine boundary layer structure along the california coast. Mon Wea Rev 124(4):668–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dawson TE (1998) Fog in the California redwood forest: ecosystem inputs and use by plants. Oecologia 117(4):476–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dickinson R, Henderson-Sellers A, Kennedy P (1993) Biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS) version 1e as coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model. Tech. rep., NCAR/TN-387+STRGoogle Scholar
  5. Filonczuk MK, Cayan DR, Riddle LG (1995) Variability of marine fog along the california coast. Tech. rep., UC San Diego: Scripps Institution of Oceanography, retreived from http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2kc7x97f
  6. Garreaud R, Barichivich J, Christie DA, Maldonado A (2008) Interannual variability of the coastal fog at Fray Jorge relict forests in semiarid Chile. J Geophys Res 113(G4):G04,011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giorgi F, Coppola E, Solmon F, Mariotti L, Sylla M, Bi X, Elguindi N, Diro GT, Nair V, Giuliani G, Cozzini S, Guettler I, O’Brien TA, Tawfik A, Shalaby A, Zakey A, Steiner A, Stordal F, Sloan L, Brankovic C (2012) RegCM4: model description and preliminary tests over multiple CORDEX domains. Clim Rev 52:7–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grell G (1993) Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus parameterizations. Mon Wea Rev 121:764–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grenier H, Bretherton CS (2001) A moist PBL parameterization for large-scale models and its application to subtropical cloud-topped marine boundary layers. Mon Wea Rev 129(3):357–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnstone JA, Dawson TE (2010) Climatic context and ecological implications of summer fog decline in the coast redwood region. Proc Nat Acad Sci 107(10):4533–4538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J, Yang SK, Hnilo JJ, Fiorino M, Potter GL (2002) NCEP–DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83(11):1631–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. King M, Radke L, Hobbs P (1993) Optical properties of marine stratocumulus clouds modified by ships. J Geophys Res 98:2729–2739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koračin D, Dorman CE (2001) Marine atmospheric boundary layer divergence and clouds along California in June 1996. Mon Wea Rev 129(8):2040–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koračin D, Lewis J, Thompson WT, Dorman CE, Businger JA (2001) Transition of stratus into fog along the California coast: observations and modeling. J Atmos Sci 58(13):1714–1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koračin D, Businger J, Dorman C, Lewis J (2005) Formation, evolution, and dissipation of coastal sea fog. Bound Layer Met 117(3):447–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. LaDochy S (2005) The disappearance of dense fog in Los Angeles: another urban impact?. Phys Geogr 26(3):177–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leipper DF (1994) Fog on the U.S. west coast: a review. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 75:229–240Google Scholar
  18. Limm E, Simonin K, Bothman A, Dawson T (2009) Foliar water uptake: a common water acquisition strategy for plants of the redwood forest. Oecologia 161(3):449–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin W, Zhang M, Loeb NG (2009) Seasonal variation of the physical properties of marine boundary layer clouds off the California Coast. J Clim 22(10):2624–2638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. NCL (2012) The NCAR Command Language (Version 5.2.1) [Software]. Boulder, CO: UCAR/NCAR/CISL/VETS, http://dx.doi.org/10.5065/D6WD3XH5
  21. O’Brien TA, Chuang PY, Sloan LC, Faloona IC, Rossiter DL (2012) Coupling a new turbulence parametrization to RegCM adds realistic stratocumulus clouds. Geosci Model Dev 5(4):989–1008Google Scholar
  22. Pal J, Small E, Eltahir E (2000) Simulation of regional-scale water and energy budgets: representation of subgrid cloud and precipitation processes within RegCM. J Geophys Res Atmos 105:29579–29594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pal JS, Giorgi F, Bi X, Elguindi N, Solomon F, Gao X, Francisco R, Zakey A, Winter J, Ashfaq M, Syed F, Bell JL, Diffenbaugh NS, Karmacharya J, Konare A, Martinez D, da Rocha RP, Sloan LC, Steiner A (2007) The ICTP RegCM3 and RegCNET: regional climate modeling for the developing world. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88(9):1395–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reynolds RW, Rayner NA, Smith TM, Stokes DC, Wang W (2002) An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate. J Clim 15(13):1609–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schubert WH, Wakefield JS, Steiner EJ, Cox SK (1979a) Marine stratocumulus convection. Part I: governing equations and horizontally homogeneous solutions. J Atmos Sci 36(7):1286–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schubert WH, Wakefield JS, Steiner EJ, Cox SK (1979b) Marine stratocumulus convection. Part II: horizontally inhomogeneous solutions. J Atmos Sci 36(7):1308–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Simonin KA, Santiago LS, Dawson TE (2009) Fog interception by Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) crowns decouples physiology from soil water deficit. Plant Cell Environ 32(7):882–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stull RB (2009) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology, atmospheric and oceanographic sciences library, vol 13. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  29. Szczodrak M, Austin P, Krummel P (2001) Variability of optical depth and effective radius in marine stratocumulus clouds. J Atmos Sci 58(19):2912–2926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang L, Wang Y, Lauer A, Xie SP (2011) Simulation of seasonal variation of marine boundary layer clouds over the eastern pacific with a regional climate model. J Clim 24:3190–3210Google Scholar
  31. Witiw M, LaDochy S (2008) Trends in fog frequencies in the Los Angeles basin. Atmos Res 87(3–4):293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Travis A. O’Brien
    • 1
    • 4
  • Lisa C. Sloan
    • 1
  • Patrick Y. Chuang
    • 1
  • Ian C. Faloona
    • 2
  • James A. Johnstone
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Earth and Planetary SciencesUniversity of California, Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.Department of Land, Air, and Water ResourcesUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA
  3. 3.Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and OceanUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  4. 4.Lawrence Berkeley National LabBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations