Climate Dynamics

, Volume 40, Issue 3–4, pp 585–599 | Cite as

Resolution dependence of tropical cyclone formation in CMIP3 and finer resolution models

  • Kevin Walsh
  • Sally Lavender
  • Enrico Scoccimarro
  • Hiroyuki Murakami
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Detection of tropical lows is performed in a suite of climate model simulations using objectively-determined detection thresholds that are resolution-dependent. It is found that there is some relationship between model resolution and tropical cyclone formation rate even after the resolution-dependent tropical cyclone detection threshold is applied. The relationship is investigated between model-simulated tropical cyclone formation and a climate-based tropical cyclone Genesis Potential Index (GPI). It is found that coarser-resolution models simulate the GPI better than they simulate formation of tropical cyclones directly. As a result, there appears to be little relationship from model to model between model GPI and the directly-simulated cyclone formation rate. Statistical analysis of the results shows that the main advantage of increasing model resolution is to give a considerably better pattern of cyclone formation. Finer resolution models also simulate a slightly better pattern of GPI, and for these models there is some relationship between the pattern of GPI simulated by each model and that model’s pattern of simulated tropical cyclone formation.

Keywords

Tropical cyclones Climate modelling 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the ARC Network for Earth System Science, Woodside Energy, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Climate Adaptation Flagship and their respective institutions for providing funding for this work. We would also like to thank Deborah Abbs of CSIRO for her detailed comments on an earlier draft of this work. We would like to thank CSIRO for the use of their tropical cyclone detection routine. We would also like to thank Aurel Moise of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, and Aaron McDonough and Peter Edwards of CSIRO for assistance with obtaining CMIP3 model output.

References

  1. Bender MA, Knutson TR, Tuleya RE, Sirutis JJ, Vecchi GA, Garner ST, Held IM (2010) Modelled impact of anthropogenic warming of the frequency of intense Atlantic hurricanes. Science 327:454–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Betts AK (1986) A new convective adjustment scheme. Part I: observational and theoretical basis. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 112:677–691Google Scholar
  3. Bister M, Emanuel K (1997) The genesis of Hurricane Guillermo: TEXMEX analyses and a modelling study. Mon Weather Rev 125:1397–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bony S, Sud Y, Lau KM, Susskind J, Saha S (1997) Comparison and satellite assessment of NASA/DAO and NCEP–NCAR reanalyses over tropical ocean: atmospheric hydrology and radiation. J Clim 10:1441–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Camargo SJ, Sobel AH (2004) Formation of tropical storms in an atmospheric general circulation model. Tellus 56A:56–67Google Scholar
  6. Camargo SJ, Barnston AG, Zebiak SE (2005) A statistical assessment of tropical cyclones in atmospheric general circulation models. Tellus 57A:589–604Google Scholar
  7. Camargo SJ, Sobel AH, Barnston AG, Emanuel KA (2007) Tropical cyclone genesis potential index in climate models. Tellus 59A:428–443Google Scholar
  8. Camargo SJ, Wheeler MC, Sobel AH (2009) Diagnosis of the MJO modulation of tropical cyclogenesis using an empirical index. J Atmos Sci 66:3061–3074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charney JG, Eliassen A (1964) On the growth of the hurricane depression. J Atmos Sci 21:68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen SS, Price JF, Zhao W, Donelan MA, Walsh EJ (2007) The CBLAST-Hurricane program and the next-generation fully coupled atmosphere-wave-ocean models for hurricane research and prediction. Bull Amer Meteorol Soc 88:311–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daloz A-S, Chauvin F, Walsh K, Lavender S, Abbs D, Roux F (2012) The ability of GCMs to simulate tropical cyclones and their precursors over the North Atlantic main development region. Clim Dyn (in press)Google Scholar
  12. DelSole T, Shukla J (2010) Model fidelity versus skill in seasonal forecasting. J Clim 23:4794–4806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emanuel KA (1991) A scheme for representing cumulus convection in large-scale models. J Atmos Sci 48:2313–2335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emanuel KA, Nolan DS (2004) Tropical cyclone activity and global climate. In: Proceedings of 26th conference on hurricanes and tropical meteorology, American Meteorological Society, pp 240–241Google Scholar
  15. Evans JL, Shemo RE (1996) A procedure for automated satellite-based identification and climatology development of various classes of organized convection. J Appl Meteor 35:638–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fu X, Wang B (2009) Critical roles of the stratiform rainfall in sustaining the Madden–Julian oscillation: GCM experiments. J Clim 22:3939–3959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gentry MS, Lackmann GM (2010) Sensitivity of simulated tropical cyclone structure and intensity to horizontal resolution. Mon Weather Rev 138:688–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray WM (1968) Global view of the origin of tropical disturbances and storms. Mon Weather Rev 110:572–586Google Scholar
  19. Gray WM (1975) Tropical cyclone genesis. Dept. of Atmos. Sci. Paper No. 232, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO, 121 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Gregory D, Rowntree PR (1990) A mass flux convection scheme with representation of cloud ensemble characteristics and stability-dependent closure. Mon Weather Rev 118:1483–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hendricks EA, Montgomery MT, Davis CA (2004) The role of “vortical” hot towers in the formation of tropical cyclone Diana (1984). J Atmos Sci 61:1209–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J, Yang S-K, Hnilo JJ, Fiorino M, Potter GL (2002) NCEP-DEO AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1631–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Knapp KR, Kruk MC, Levinson DH, Diamond HJ, Neumann CJ (2010) The International Best Track archive for climate stewardship (IBTrACS). Bull Amer Meteor Soc 91:363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knutson TR, Landsea C, Emanuel K (2010a) Tropical cyclones and climate change: a review. In: Chan JCL, Kepert J (eds) Global perspectives on tropical cyclones. World Scientific, pp 243–286Google Scholar
  25. Knutson TR, McBride JL, Chan J, Emanuel K, Holland G, Landsea C, Held I, Kossin JP, Srivastava AK, Sugi M (2010b) Tropical cyclones and climate change. Nat Geosci 3:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kofron DE, Ritchie EA, Tyo JS (2010) Determination of a consistent time for the extratropical transition of tropical cyclones. Part I: examination of existing methods for finding “ET Time”. Mon Weather Rev 138:4328–4343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. LaRow TE, Lim Y-K, Shin DW, Chassignet EP, Cocke S (2008) Atlantic basin seasonal hurricane simulations. J Clim 21:3191–3206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lavender SL, Walsh KJE (2011) Dynamically downscaled simulations of Australian region tropical cyclones in current and future climates. Geophys Res Lett. doi: 10.1029/2011GL047499 Google Scholar
  29. Lin J-L, Kiladis GN, Mapes BE, Weickman KM, Sperber KR, Lin W, Wheeler MC, Schubert SD, Del Genio A, Donner LJ, Emori S, Gueremy J-F, Hourdin F, Rasch PJ, Roeckner E, Scinocca JF (2006) Tropical intraseasonal variability in 14 IPCC AR4 climate models. Part I: convective signals. J Clim 19:2665–2690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Madden RA, Julian PR (1971) Detection of a 40–50 day oscillation in the zonal wind in the tropical Pacific. J Atmos Sci 28:702–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Madec G, Delecluse P, Imbard M, Levy C (1998) OPA 8.1 Ocean general circulation model reference manual, Internal Rep. 11, Inst. Pierre-Simon Laplace, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  32. McBride JL, Zehr R (1981) Observational analysis of tropical cyclone formation. Part II: comparison of non-developing versus developing systems. J Atmos Sci 38:1132–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McDonald RE, Bleaken DG, Cresswell DR (2005) Tropical storms: representation and diagnosis in climate models and the impacts of climate change. Clim Dyn 25:19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mizuta R, Oouchi K, Yoshimura H, Noda A, Katayama K, Yukimoto S, Hosaka M, Kusunoki S, Kawai H, Nakagawa M (2006) 20-km-mesh global climate simulations using JMA-GSM model–mean climate states. J Meteor Soc Japan 84:165–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moorthi S, Suarez MJ (1992) Relaxed Arakawa-Schubert. A parameterization of moist convection for general circulation models. Mon Weather Rev 120:978–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Murakami H, Sugi M (2010) Effect of model resolution on tropical cyclone climate projections. SOLA 6:73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Murakami H, Wang Y, Yoshimura H, Mizuta R, Sugi M, Shindo E, Adachi Y, Yukimoto S, Hosaka M, Kitoh A, Ose T, Kusunoki S (2012a) Future changes in tropical cyclone activity projected by the new high-resolution MRI-AGCM. J Clim (in press)Google Scholar
  38. Murakami H, Mizuta R, Shindo E (2012b) Future changes in tropical cyclone activity projected by multi-physics and multi-SST ensemble experiments using the 60-km-mesh MRI-AGCM. Clim Dyn (in press)Google Scholar
  39. Nordeng TE (1994) Extended versions of the convective parameterization scheme at ECMWF and their impact on the mean and transient activity of the model in the tropics. Technical Memorandum No. 206, European centre for medium-range weather forecasts, reading, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  40. Palmen E (1956) A review of knowledge on the formation and development of tropical cyclones. In: Proceedings of Tropical Cyclone symposium, Brisbane, Australian Bureau of Meteorology, P.O. Box 1289, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, pp 213–232Google Scholar
  41. Pezza AB, Simmonds I (2005) The first South Atlantic hurricane: Unprecedented blocking, low shear and climate change. Geophys Res Lett 32, doi: 10.1029/2005GL023390
  42. Randall DA, Pan D-M (1993) Implementation of the Arakawa-Schubert cumulus parameterization with a prognostic closure. In: Emanuel KA, Raymond DJ (eds) The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models. American Meteorological Society Monograph 46, pp 137–144Google Scholar
  43. Roeckner E, Bauml G, Bonaventura L, Brokopf R, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Hagemann S, Kirchner I, Kornblueh L, Manzini E, Rhodin A, Schlese U, Schulzweida U, Tompkins A (2003) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5. Part I: model description. Rep. No. 349, Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, 127 ppGoogle Scholar
  44. Rotunno R, Emanuel KA (1987) An air–sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones. Part II: evolutionary study using a nonhydrostatic axisymmetric numerical model. J Atmos Sci 44:542–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Royer J-F, Chauvin F, Timbal B, Araspin P, Grimal D (1998) A GCM study of the impact of greenhouse gas increase on the frequency of occurrence of tropical cyclones. Clim Change 38:307–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scoccimarro E, Gualdi S, Bellucci A, Sanna A, Fogli PG, Manzini E, Vichi M, Oddo P, Navarra A (2011) Effects of tropical cyclones on ocean heat transport in a high resolution coupled general circulation model. J Clim 24:4368–4384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seo K-H, Wang W (2010) The Madden–Julian Oscillation simulated in the NCEP climate forecast system model: the importance of stratiform heating. J Clim 23:4770–4793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shapiro MA, Keyser D (1990) Fronts, jet streams and the tropopause. In: Newton CW, Holopainen EO (eds) Extratropical cyclones: the Erik Palmen memorial volume. Amer Meteorol Soc, pp 167–191Google Scholar
  49. Taylor KE (2001) Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J Geophys Res 106:7183–7192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thorncroft C, Hodges K (2001) African easterly wave variability and its relationship to Atlantic tropical cyclone activity. J Clim 14:1166–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tiedtke M (1989) A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon Weather Rev 117:1779–1800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tippett MK, Camargo SJ, Sobel AH (2011) A Poisson regression index for tropical cyclone genesis and the role of large-scale vorticity in genesis. J Clim 24:2335–2357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tokioka T, Yamazaki K, Kitoh A, Ose T (1988) The equatorial 30–60-day oscillation and the Arakawa-Schubert penetrative cumulus parameterization. J Meteor Soc Japan 66:883–901Google Scholar
  54. Uppala SM, Kållberg PW, Simmons AJ, Andrae U, Bechtold VDC, Fiorino M, Gibson JK, Haseler J, Hernandez A, Kelly GA, Li X, Onogi K, Saarinen S, Sokka N, Allan RP, Andersson E, Arpe K, Balmaseda MA, Beljaars ACM, Berg LVD, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Caires S, Chevallier F, Dethof A, Dragosavac M, Fisher M, Fuentes M, Hagemann S, Hólm E, Hoskins BJ, Isaksen L, Janssen PAEM, Jenne R, Mcnally AP, Mahfouf J-F, Morcrette J-J, Rayner NA, Saunders RW, Simon P, Sterl A, Trenberth KE, Untch A, Vasiljevic D, Viterbo P, Woollen J (2005) The ERA-40 re-analysis. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 131:2961–3012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vecchi GA, Soden BJ (2007) Effect of remote sea surface temperature change on tropical cyclone potential intensity. Nature 450:1066–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vitart F, Anderson JL (2001) Sensitivity of Atlantic tropical storm frequency to ENSO and interdecadal variability of SSTs in an ensemble of AGCM integrations. J Clim 14:533–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vitart F, Anderson JL, Sirutis J, Tuleya RE (2001) Sensitivity of tropical storms simulated by a general circulation model to changes in cumulus parameterization. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 127:25–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walsh K, Fiorino M, Landsea C, McInnes K (2007) Objectively-determined resolution-dependent threshold criteria for the detection of tropical cyclones in climate models and reanalyses. J Clim 20:2307–2314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walsh K, Lavender S, Murakami H, Scoccimarro E, Caron L-P, Ghantous M (2010) The tropical cyclone climate model intercomparison project. Hurricanes and climate (2nd edn). Springer, New York, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  60. Wang W, Schlesinger ME (1999) The dependence on convection parameterization of the tropical intraseasonal oscillation simulated by the UIUC 11-layer atmospheric GCM. J Clim 12:1423–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yokoi S, Takayabu YN, Chan JCL (2009) Tropical cyclone genesis frequency over the western North Pacific simulated in medium-resolution coupled general circulation models. Clim Dyn 33:665–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yoshimura S, Sugi M, Murakami H, Kusunoki S (2011) Tropical cyclone frequency and its changes in a 20C-21C simulation by a global atmospheric model. Presented at the 3rd international summit on hurricanes and climate change, Rhodes, Greece, June 27–July 2, 2011Google Scholar
  63. Zhang GJ, McFarlane NA (1995) Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian climate centre general circulation model. Atmos Ocean 33:407–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhao M, Held IM, Lin S-J, Vecchi GA (2009) Simulations of global hurricane climatology, interannual variability, and response to global warming using a 50 km resolution GCM. J Clim 22:6653–6678CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Walsh
    • 1
  • Sally Lavender
    • 2
  • Enrico Scoccimarro
    • 3
  • Hiroyuki Murakami
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Earth SciencesUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric ResearchAspendaleAustralia
  3. 3.Instituto Nazionale di Geofisica e VulcanologiaBolognaItaly
  4. 4.JAMSTEC Meteorological Research InstituteTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations