Climate Dynamics

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 1527–1542 | Cite as

Albedo enhancement over land to counteract global warming: impacts on hydrological cycle

Article

Abstract

A recent modelling study has shown that precipitation and runoff over land would increase when the reflectivity of marine clouds is increased to counter global warming. This implies that large scale albedo enhancement over land could lead to a decrease in runoff over land. In this study, we perform simulations using NCAR CAM3.1 that have implications for Solar Radiation Management geoengineering schemes that increase the albedo over land. We find that an increase in reflectivity over land that mitigates the global mean warming from a doubling of CO2 leads to a large residual warming in the southern hemisphere and cooling in the northern hemisphere since most of the land is located in northern hemisphere. Precipitation and runoff over land decrease by 13.4 and 22.3%, respectively, because of a large residual sinking motion over land triggered by albedo enhancement over land. Soil water content also declines when albedo over land is enhanced. The simulated magnitude of hydrological changes over land are much larger when compared to changes over oceans in the recent marine cloud albedo enhancement study since the radiative forcing over land needed (−8.2 W m−2) to counter global mean radiative forcing from a doubling of CO2 (3.3 W m−2) is approximately twice the forcing needed over the oceans (−4.2 W m−2). Our results imply that albedo enhancement over oceans produce climates closer to the unperturbed climate state than do albedo changes on land when the consequences on land hydrology are considered. Our study also has important implications for any intentional or unintentional large scale changes in land surface albedo such as deforestation/afforestation/reforestation, air pollution, and desert and urban albedo modification.

Supplementary material

382_2011_1256_MOESM1_ESM.doc (104 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 104 kb)

References

  1. Akbari H, Menon S, Rosenfeld A (2009) Global cooling: increasing world-wide urban albedos to offset CO2. Climatic Change 94(3–4):275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen MR, Ingram WJ (2002) Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. Nature 419(6903):224–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews T, Forster PM, Gregory JM (2009) A surface energy perspective on climate change. J Clim 22:2557–2570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angel R (2006) Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point (L1). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(46):17184–17189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bala G et al (2007) Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(16):6550–6555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bala G, Duffy PB, Taylor KE (2008) Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(22):7664–7669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bala G, Caldeira K, Nemani R (2010) Fast versus slow response in climate change: implications for the global hydrological cycle. Clim Dyn 35(2–3):423–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bala G et al (2010b) Albedo enhancement of marine clouds to counteract global warming: impacts on the hydrological cycle. Clim Dyn. doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0868-1
  9. Ban-Weiss G, Cao L, Bala G, Caldeira K (2011) Dependence of climate forcing and response on the altitude of black carbon aerosols. Clim Dyn. doi:10.1007/s00382-011-1052-y
  10. Betts RA et al (2007) Projected increase in continental runoff due to plant responses to increasing carbon dioxide. Nature 448(7157):1037–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boer GJ (2011) The ratio of land to ocean temperature change under globalwarming. Clim Dyn. doi:10.1007/s00382-011-1112-3
  12. Boucher O, Jones A, Betts RA (2009) Climate response to the physiological impact of carbon dioxide on plants in the Met Office Unified Model HadCM3. Clim Dyn 32(2–3):237–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bower K, Choularton T, Latham J, Sahraei J, Salter S (2006) Computational assessment of a proposed technique for global warming mitigation via albedo-enhancement of marine stratocumulus clouds. Atmos Res 82(1–2):328–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cao L, Bala G, Caldeira K, Nemani R, Ban-Weiss G (2009) Climate response to physiological forcing of carbon dioxide simulated by the coupled Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3.1) and Community Land Model (CLM3.0). Geophys Res Lett (in press)Google Scholar
  15. Cao L, Bala G, Caldeira K, Nemani R, Ban-Weiss G (2010) Importance of carbon dioxide physiological forcing to future climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(21):9513–9518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Charney JG (1975) Dynamics of deserts and drought in sahel. QJ Roy Meteorol Soc 101(428):193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Collins WD et al (2006) The formulation and atmospheric simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3). J Clim 19(11):2144–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crutzen PJ (2006) Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Clim Chang 77(3–4):211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doughty CE, Field CB, McMillan AMS (2011) Can crop albedo be increased through the modification of leaf trichomes, and could this cool regional climate? Clim Chang 104:379–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doutriaux-Boucher M, Webb MJ, Gregory JM, Boucher O (2009) Carbon dioxide induced stomatal closure increases radiative forcing via a rapid reduction in low cloud. Geophys Res Lett 36: L02703. doi:10.1029/2008gl036273
  21. Early JT (1989) The space based solar shield to offset greenhouse effect. J Brit Interplanet Soc 42:567–569Google Scholar
  22. Evans JRG, Stride EPJ, Edirisinghe MJ, Andrews DJ, Simons RR (2010) Can oceanic foams limit global warming? Clim Res 42(2):155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flannery BP, Kheshgi H, Marland G, MacCracken MC (1997) Geoengineering climate. In: Watts R (ed) Engineering response to global climate change. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 403–421Google Scholar
  24. Forster PM, Blackburn M, Glover R, Shine KP (2000) An examination of climate sensitivity for idealised climate change experiments in an intermediate general circulation model. Clim Dyn 16(10–11):833–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gedney N et al (2006) Detection of a direct carbon dioxide effect in continental river runoff records. Nature 439(7078):835–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gibbard S, Caldeira K, Bala G, Phillips TJ, Wickett M (2005) Climate effects of global land cover change. Geophys Res Lett 32(23): L23705. doi:10.1029/2005GL024550
  27. Gregory J, Webb M (2008) Tropospheric adjustment induces a cloud component in CO2 forcing. J Clim 21(1):58–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gregory JM et al (2004) A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys Res Lett 31(3): L03205. doi:10.1029/2003GL018747
  29. Hansen J et al (2005) Efficacy of climate forcings. J Geophys Res Atmos 110(D18): D18104. doi:10.1029/2005JD005776
  30. Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R (1997) Radiative forcing and climate response. J Geophys Res Atmos 102(D6):6831–6864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Held IM, Soden BJ (2006) Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Clim 19(21):5686–5699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Holton J (1992) An introduction to dynamics meteorology. Academic Press, New York, p 511Google Scholar
  33. IPCC (1990) Climate change: the IPCC scientific assessment. contribution of working group 1 to the first assessent report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group i to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones A, Haywood J, Boucher O (2009) Climate impacts of geoengineering marine stratocumulus clouds. J Geophys Res Atmos 114: D10106. doi:10.1029/2008JD011450
  36. Jones A, Haywood J, Boucher O (2011) A comparison of the climate impacts of geoengineering by stratospheric SO(2) injection and by brightening of marine stratocumulus cloud. Atmos Sci Lett 12(2):176–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Joshi MM, Gregory JM, Webb MJ, Sexton DMH, Johns TC (2008) Mechanisms for the land/sea warming contrast exhibited by simulations of climate change. Clim Dyn 30(5):455–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Konwar M et al (2010) Suppression of warm rain by aerosols in rain-shadow areas of India. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 10:17009–17027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lambert FH, Webb MJ, Joshi MM (2011) The relationship between land-ocean surface temperature contrast and radiative forcing. J Clim 24(13):3239–3256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Latham J (1990) Control of global warming. Nature 347(6291):339–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Latham J (2002) Amelioration of global warming by controlled enhancement of the albedo and longevity of low-level maritime clouds. Atmos Sci Lett. doi:10.1006/Asle.2002.0048
  42. Latham J et al (2008) Global temperature stabilization via controlled albedo enhancement of low-level maritime clouds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 366(1882):3969–3987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lenton TM, Vaughan NE (2009) The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering options. Atmos Chem Phys 9(15):5539–5561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. NAS (1992) Policy implications of greenhouse warming: mitigation, adaptation and the science base. National Academy of Sciences. National Academy Press, Washington D.C, Chap 28 (Geoengineering), pp. 433–464Google Scholar
  45. Oleson KW, Bonan GB, Feddema J (2010) Effects of white roofs on urban temperature in a global climate model. Geophys Res Lett 37Google Scholar
  46. PSAC (1965) Restoring the quality of our environment, appendix Y4, atmospheric carbon dioxide, 111–133, report by the US President’s Scientific Advisory Committee, The White House, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  47. Ridgwell A, Singarayer JS, Hetherington AM, Valdes PJ (2009) Tackling regional climate change by leaf albedo bio-geoengineering. Curr Biol 19(2):146–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Robock A, Oman L, Stenchikov GL (2008) Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections. J Geophys Res 113:D16101. doi:10.1029/2008JD010050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robock A, Marquardt A, Kravitz B, Stenchikov G (2009) Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering. Geophys Res Lett 36: L19703. doi:10.1029/2009GL039209
  50. Rosenfeld D (2000) Suppression of rain and snow by urban and industrial air pollution. Science 287(5459):1793–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosenfeld D et al (2007) Inverse relations between amounts of air pollution and orographic precipitation. Science 315(5817):1396–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rosenfeld D et al (2008) Aircraft measurements of the impacts of pollution aerosols on clouds and precipitation over the Sierra Nevada. J Geophys Res Atmos 113(D15): D15203. doi:10.1029/2007JD009544
  53. Royal Society Report (2009) Geoengineering the climate; science, governance and uncertainty. RS Policy document 10/09, London, ISBN: 978-0-85403-773-5Google Scholar
  54. Seifritz W (1989) Mirrors to halt global warming. Nature 340(6235):603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shine KP, Cook J, Highwood EJ, Joshi MM (2003) An alternative to radiative forcing for estimating the relative importance of climate change mechanisms. Geophys Res Lett 30(20): 2047. doi:10.1029/2003GL018141
  56. Sutton RT, Dong BW, Gregory JM (2007) Land/sea warming ratio in response to climate change: IPCC AR4 model results and comparison with observations. Geophys Res Lett 34(2): L02701. doi:10.1029/2006GL028164
  57. Zwiers F, von Storch H (1995) Taking serial correlation into account in tests of the mean. J Clim 8:336–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Divecha Center for Climate Change and Center for Atmospheric and Oceanic SciencesIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations