Advertisement

Climate Dynamics

, Volume 38, Issue 3–4, pp 573–593 | Cite as

Modeling the hydroclimatology of the midwestern United States. Part 1: current climate

  • Jonathan M. WinterEmail author
  • Elfatih A. B. Eltahir
Article

Abstract

An ensemble of six 22-year numerical experiments was conducted to evaluate the ability of Regional Climate Model version 3 (RegCM3) to simulate the energy and water budgets of the midwestern United States. RegCM3 was run using two surface physics schemes: Integrated Biosphere Simulator (IBIS) and Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme 1e (BATS1e), and two convective closure assumptions: Fritsch & Chappell (FC80) and Arakawa & Schubert (AS74). Boundary conditions were provided by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction-Department of Energy Reanalysis 2 dataset and the ECHAM5 general circulation model. A companion paper examines the American Midwest under future climate scenarios. Overall, the model that reproduces the observed seasonal cycles of the midwestern United States climate system best is RegCM3 using IBIS and the AS74 convective closure assumption. IBIS simulates shortwave radiation more accurately, while BATS1e simulates longwave radiation more accurately. Summer two-meter air temperature is overestimated by the combination of IBIS and the FC80 convective closure assumption. All models contain a wet bias and overestimate evapotranspiration during the spring. Total runoff, surface runoff, groundwater runoff, and root zone soil moisture are best simulated by RegCM3 using IBIS and the AS74 convective closure assumption. While BATS1e does capture the seasonal cycle of total runoff, gross errors in the partitioning of total runoff between surface runoff and groundwater runoff exist. The seasonal cycle of root zone soil moisture simulated by RegCM3 using IBIS and the AS74 convective closure assumption is dry, but agrees with observations during the summer. The rest of the models underestimate root zone soil moisture.

Keywords

Hydrology Regional climate modeling Midwestern United States 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, the Eltahir group, members of the Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory who aided in this research, our reviewers, and our editor. Individuals who made significant contributions to this work include Jeremy Pal and Marc Marcella. This work was funded by the National Science Foundation (Award EAR-04500341) and the Martin Family Fellowship.

References

  1. Arakawa A, Schubert WH (1974) Interaction of a cumulus cloud ensemble with large-scale environment, part 1. J Atmos Sci 31:674–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartlein P (2000) Absolute minimum temperature minus average of the coldest monthly mean temperature, sources include: Worldwide Airfield Summaries (NCDC TD-9647), Climatology of the U.S., No 20 (1951–80)Google Scholar
  3. Bell JL, Sloan LC, Snyder MA (2004) Regional changes in extreme climatic events: a future climate scenario. J Clim 17:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davies H, Turner R (1977) Updating prediction models by dynamical relaxation: an examination of the technique. Q J R Meteorol Soc 103:225–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delworth TL, Stouffer RJ, Dixon KW, Spelman MJ, Knutson TR, Broccoli AJ, Kushner PJ, Wetherald RT (2002) Review of simulations of climate variability and change with the GFDL R30 coupled climate model. Clim Dyn 19:555–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dickinson R, Henderson-Sellers A, Kennedy P (1993) Biosphere Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) version 1E as coupled to the NCAR community climate model. Technical Note TN-387+STR, National Center for Atmospheric ResearchGoogle Scholar
  7. Diffenbaugh NS, Ashfaq M, Shuman B, Williams JW, Bartlein PJ (2006) Summer aridity in the United States: response to mid-holocene changes in insolation and sea surface temperature. Geophys Res Lett 33:L22712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foley JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Levis S, Pollard D, Sitch S, Haxeltine A (1996) An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamics. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 10:603–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fritsch JM, Chappell CF (1980) Numerical prediction of convectively driven mesoscale pressure systems. Part I: convective parameterizations. J Atmos Sci 37:1722–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grell GA, Dudhia J, Stauffer D (1994) A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). Technical Note TN-398+IA, National Center for Atmospheric ResearchGoogle Scholar
  11. Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J, Yang SK, Hnilo JJ, Fiorino M, Potter GL (2002) NCEP/DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1631–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liang XZ, Li L, Kunkel KE, Ting M, Wang JXL (2004) Regional climate model simulation of U.S. precipitation during 1982–2002. Part i: annual cycle. J Clim 17:3510–3529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liang XZ, Pan J, Zhu J, Kunkel KE, Wang JXL, Dai A (2006) Regional climate model downscaling of the U.S. summer climate and future change. J Geophys Res 111:D10108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Manabe S, Wetherald RT, Milly PCD, Delworth TL, Stouffer RJ (2004) Century-scale changes in water availability: CO2 quadrupling experiment. Clim Change 64:59–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martínez-Castro D, Porfirioda Rocha R, Bezanilla-Morlot A, Alvarez-Escudero L, Reyes-Fernández JP, Silva-Vidal Y, Arritt RW (2006) Sensitivity studies of the regcm3 simulation of summer precipitation, temperature and local wind field in the Caribbean region. Theor Appl Climatol 86:5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mitchell TD, Carter TR, Jones PD, Hulme M, New M (2004) A comprehensive set of high resolution grids of monthly climate for Europe and the globe: the observed record (1901–2000) and 16 scenarios (2001–2100). Tyndall Working Paper 55, URL http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/
  17. NASA (2006) Surface radiation budget. online, URL http://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov
  18. New M, Hulme M, Jones PD (1999) Representing twentieth century space-time climate variablility. Part 1: development of a 1961–90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology. J Clim 12:829–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pal JS (2001) Modeling the role of soil moisture in North American summer climate. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  20. Pal JS, Small EE, Eltahir EAB (2000) Simulation of regional-scale water and energy budgets: representation of subgrid cloud and precipitation processes within RegCM. J Geophys Res 105:29579–29594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pal JS, Giorgi F, Bi X (2004) Consistency of recent European summer precipitation trends and extremes with future regional climate projections. Geophys Res Lett 31:L13202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pal JS, Giorgi F, Bi X, Elguindi N, Solmon F, Gao X, Rauscher SA, Francisco R, Zakey A, Winter J, Ashfaq M, Syed FS, Bell JL, Diffenbaugh NS, Karmacharya J, Konaré A, Martinez D, Da Rocha RP, Sloan LC, Steiner AL (2007) Regional climate modeling for the developing world: the ICTP RegCM3 and RegCNET. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88:1395–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramankutty N (1999) Estimating historical changes in land cover: North American croplands from 1850 to 1992. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 8:381–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Randall DA, Wood RA, Bony S, Colman R, Fichefet T, Fyfe J, Kattsov V, Pitman A, Shukla J, Srinivasan J, Stouffer RJ, Sumi A, Taylor KE (2007) Climate models and their evaluation. In: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Reynolds RW, Rayner NA, Smith TM, Stokes DC, Wang W (2002) An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate. J Clim 15:1609–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roeckner E, Bäuml G, Bonaventura L, Brokopf R, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Hagemann S, Kirchner I, Kornblueh L, Manzini E, Rhodin A, Schlese U, Schulzweida U, Tompkins A (2003) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5. Part I: model description. Tech. rep., Max-Plank Institute for MeteorologyGoogle Scholar
  27. Roeckner E, Lautenschlager M, Esch M (2006a) IPCC-AR4 MPI-ECHAM5_T63L31 MPI-OM_GR1.5L40 20C3M run no.3: atmosphere monthly mean values MPImet/MaD Germany. Tech. rep., World Data Center for ClimateGoogle Scholar
  28. Roeckner E, Lautenschlager M, Schneider H (2006b) IPCC-AR4 MPI-ECHAM5_T63L31 MPI-OM_GR1.5L40 SRESA1B run no.3: atmosphere monthly mean values MPImet/MaD Germany. Tech. rep., World Data Center for ClimateGoogle Scholar
  29. Seneviratne SI, Pal JS, Eltahir EAB, Schär C (2002) Summer dryness in a warmer climate: a process study with a regional climate model. Clim Dyn 20:69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tchotchou L, Kamga F (2010) Sensitivity of the simulated African monsoon of summers 1993 and 1999 to convective parameterization schemes in regcm3. Theor Appl Climatol 100:207–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. USGS (1996) Global 30-Arc Second Elevation Dataset (GTOPO30). online, URL http://edc.usgs.gov/products/elevation/gtopo30/gtopo30.html
  32. USGS (1997) Global land cover characterization. online, URL http://edcsns17.cr.usgs.gov/glcc/
  33. Wang G (2005) Agricultural drought in a future climate: results from 15 global climate models participating the the 4th assessment. Clim Dyn 25:739–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Winter JM, Pal JS, Eltahir EAB (2009) Coupling of integrated biosphere simulator to regional climate model version 3. J Clim 22:2743–2757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yeh PJF (2003) Representation of water table dynamics in a land surface scheme: observations, models, and analyses. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  36. Yeh PJF (2005) Representation of water table dynamics in a land surface scheme. Part I: model development. J Clim 18:1861–1880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yeh PJF, Irizarry M, Eltahir EAB (1998) Hydroclimatology of Illinois: a comparison of monthly evaporation estimates based on atmospheric water and soil water balance. J Geophys Res 103:19823–19837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zanis P, Douvis C, Kapsomenakis I, Kioutsioukis I, Melas D, Pal J (2009) A sensitivity study of the regional climate model (regcm3) to the convective scheme with emphasis in central eastern and southeastern Europe. Theor Appl Climatol 97:327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag (outside the USA) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.NASA Goddard Institute for Space StudiesNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations