Climate Dynamics

, Volume 39, Issue 1–2, pp 277–285 | Cite as

The sensitivity of the meridional overturning circulation to modelling uncertainty in a perturbed physics ensemble without flux adjustment

  • Laura C. Jackson
  • Michael Vellinga
  • Glen R. Harris
Article

Abstract

Ocean dynamics play a key role in the climate system, by redistributing heat and freshwater. The uncertainty of how these processes are represented in climate models, and how this uncertainty affects future climate projections can be investigated using perturbed physics ensembles of global circulation models (GCMs). Techniques such as flux adjustments should be avoided since they can impact the sensitivity of the ensemble to the imposed forcing. In this study a method for developing an coupled ensemble with a GCM that does not use flux adjustment is presented. The ensemble is constrained by using information from a prior ensemble with a mixed layer ocean coupled to an atmosphere GCM, to reduce drifts in the coupled ensemble. Constraints on parameter perturbations are derived by using observational constraints on surface temperature, and top of the atmosphere radiative fluxes. As an example of such an ensemble developed with this methodology, uncertainty in response of the meridional overturning circulation (MOC) to increased CO2 concentrations is investigated. The ensemble mean MOC strength is 17.1 Sv and decreases by 2.1 Sv when greenhouse gas concentrations are doubled. No rapid changes or shutdown of the MOC are seen in any of the ensemble members. There is a strong negative relationship between global mean temperature and MOC strength across the ensemble which is not seen in a multimodel ensemble. A positive relationship between climate sensitivity and the decrease of MOC strength is also seen.

Keywords

Climate Ensemble MOC GCM 

References

  1. Brierley CM, Collins M, Thorpe AJ (2010) The impact of perturbations to ocean-model parameters on climate and climate change in a coupled model. Clim Dyn 34:325–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Collins M, Booth BBB, Bhaskaran B, Harris GR, Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Webb MJ (2011) Climate model errors, feedbacks and forcings: a comparison of perturbed physics and multi-model ensembles. Clim Dyn 36:1737–1766Google Scholar
  3. Cubasch U, Meehl G, Boer G, Stouffer R, Dix M, Noda A, Senior C, Raper S, Yap K (2001) Projections of future climate change. In: Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of working group 1 to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 526–582Google Scholar
  4. Cunningham S, Kanzow T, Rayner D, Baringer M, Johns W, Marotzke J, Longworth H, Grant E, Hirschi J, Beal L, Meinen C, Bryden H (2007) Temporal variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 26.5°N. Science 317:935–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dijkstra H, Neelin J (1999) Imperfections of the thermohaline circulation: multiple equilibria and flux correction. J Clim 12:1382–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gordon C, Cooper C, Senior C, Banks H, Gregory J, Johns T, Mitchell J, Wood R (2000) The simulation of sst, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the hadley centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Clim Dyn 16:147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gregory JM, Dixon KW, Stouffer RJ, Weaver AJ, Driesschaert E, Eby M, Fichefet T, Hasumi H, Hu A, Jungclaus JH, Kamenkovich IV, Levermann A, Montoya M, Murakami S, Nawrath S, Oka A, Sokolov AP, Thorpe RB (2005) A model intercomparison of changes in the Atlantic thermohaline circulation in response to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration. Geophys Res Lett 32. doi:10.1029/2005GL023209
  8. Kanzow T, Cunningham C, Rayner D, Hirschi J, Johns W, Baringer M, Bryden H, Beal L, Meinen C, Marotzke J (2007) Observed flow compensation associated with the moc at 26.5°N in the Atlantic. Science 317:938–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Knutti R, Allen MR, Friedlingstein P, Gregory JM, Hegerl GC, Meehl GA, Meinshausen M, Murphy JM, Plattner GK, Raper SCB, Stocker TF, Stott PA, Teng H, Wigley TML (2008) A review of uncertainties in global temperature projections over the twenty-first century. J Clim 21:2651–2663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marotzke J, Stone P (1995) Atmospheric transports, the thermohaline circulation, and flux adjustments in a simple coupled model. J Phys Oceanogr 25:1350–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Meehl G, Covey C, Delworth T, Latif M, McAvaney B, Mitchell J, Stouffer R, Taylor K (2007) The wcrp cmip3 multimodel dataset—a new era in climate change research. BAMS 9:1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Murphy JDS, Barnett D, Jones G, Webb M, Collins M, Stainforth D (2004) Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430:768–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. New M, Hulme M, Jones P (1999) Representing twentieth century space-time climate variability. Part 1: development of a 1961-90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology. J Clim 12:829–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pope V, Gallani M, Rowntree P, Stratton R (2000) The impact of new physical parameterizations in the hadley centre climate model: Hadam3. Clim Dyn 16:123–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rayner N, Parker D, Horton E, Folland C, Alexander L, Rowell D, Kent E, Kaplan A (2003) Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J Geophys Res 108:4407. doi:10.1029/2002JD002670 Google Scholar
  16. Stainforth D, Alna T, Christensen C, Collins M, Faull N, Frame D, Kettleborough J, Knight S, Martin A, Murphy J, Piani C, Sexton D, Smith L, Spicer R, Thorpe A, Allen M (2005) Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature 433:403–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stouffer RJ, Yin J, Gregory JM, Dixon KW, Spelman MJ, Hurlin W, Weaver AJ, Eby M, Flato GM, Hasumi H, Hu A, Jungclaus JH, Kamenkovich IV, Levermann A, Montoya M, Murakami S, Nawrath S, Oka A, Peltier WR, Robitaille DY, Sokolov A, Vettoretti G, Weber SL (2006) Investigating the causes of the response of the thermohaline circulation to past and future climate changes. J Clim 19:1365–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thorpe R, Gregory J, Johns T, Wood R, Mitchell J (2001) Mechanisms determining the Atlantic thermohaline circulation response to greenhouse gas forcing in a non-flux-adjusted coupled climate model. J Clim 14:3102–3116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vellinga M, Wood R (2002) Global climatic impacts of a collapse of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation. climatic change. Clim Change 54:251–?267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vellinga M, Wu P (2008) Relations between northward ocean and atmosphere energy transports in a coupled climate model. J Clim 21:561–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Webb M, Senior C, Sexton D, Ingram W, Williams K, Ringer M, McAvaney B, Colman R, Soden B, Gudgel R, Knutson T, Emori S, Ogura T, Tsushima Y, Andronova N, Li B, Musat I, Bony S, Taylor K (2006) On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two gcm ensembles. Clim Dyn 27:17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams K, Senior C, Mitchell J (2001) Transient climate change in the hadley centre models: the role of physical processes. J Clim 14:2659–2674CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown Copyright 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura C. Jackson
    • 1
  • Michael Vellinga
    • 1
  • Glen R. Harris
    • 1
  1. 1.Met Office Hadley CentreExeterUK

Personalised recommendations