Climate Dynamics

, Volume 37, Issue 1–2, pp 53–72 | Cite as

Changes in storm tracks and energy transports in a warmer climate simulated by the GFDL CM2.1 model

  • Yutian Wu
  • Mingfang Ting
  • Richard Seager
  • Huei-Ping Huang
  • Mark A. Cane
Article

Abstract

Storm tracks play a major role in regulating the precipitation and hydrological cycle in midlatitudes. The changes in the location and amplitude of the storm tracks in response to global warming will have significant impacts on the poleward transport of heat, momentum and moisture and on the hydrological cycle. Recent studies have indicated a poleward shift of the storm tracks and the midlatitude precipitation zone in the warming world that will lead to subtropical drying and higher latitude moistening. This study agrees with this key feature for not only the annual mean but also different seasons and for the zonal mean as well as horizontal structures based on the analysis of Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) CM2.1 model simulations. Further analyses show that the meridional sensible and latent heat fluxes associated with the storm tracks shift poleward and intensify in both boreal summer and winter in the late twenty-first century (years 2081–2100) relative to the latter half of the twentieth century (years 1961–2000). The maximum dry Eady growth rate is examined to determine the effect of global warming on the time mean state and associated available potential energy for transient growth. The trend in maximum Eady growth rate is generally consistent with the poleward shift and intensification of the storm tracks in the middle latitudes of both hemispheres in both seasons. However, in the lower troposphere in northern winter, increased meridional eddy transfer within the storm tracks is more associated with increased eddy velocity, stronger correlation between eddy velocity and eddy moist static energy, and longer eddy length scale. The changing characteristics of baroclinic instability are, therefore, needed to explain the storm track response as climate warms. Diagnosis of the latitude-by-latitude energy budget for the current and future climate demonstrates how the coupling between radiative and surface heat fluxes and eddy heat and moisture transport influences the midlatitude storm track response to global warming. Through radiative forcing by increased atmospheric carbon dioxide and water vapor, more energy is gained within the tropics and subtropics, while in the middle and high latitudes energy is reduced through increased outgoing terrestrial radiation in the Northern Hemisphere and increased ocean heat uptake in the Southern Hemisphere. This enhanced energy imbalance in the future climate requires larger atmospheric energy transports in the midlatitudes which are partially accomplished by intensified storm tracks. Finally a sequence of cause and effect for the storm track response in the warming world is proposed that combines energy budget constraints with baroclinic instability theory.

Keywords

Storm tracks Global warming 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments which lead to significant improvement of the paper. We also thank Nili Harnik for helpful discussions. This work was supported by NOAA CPPA Program and by NSF grant ATM-0543256. YW was also supported by NASA Headquarters under the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program -Grant NNX08AU80H.

References

  1. Bengtsson L, Hodges KI, Roeckner E (2006) Storm tracks and climate change. J Clim 19:3518–3543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackmon ML (1976) A climatological spectral study of the 500 mb geopotential height of the Northern Hemisphere. J Atmos Sci 33:1607–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carissimo BC, Oort AH, Haar THV (1985) Estimating the meridional energy transports in the atmosphere and ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 15:82–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang EK (1993) Downstream development of baroclinic waves as inferred from regression analysis. J Atmos Sci 50:2038–2053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang EKM, Lee S, Swanson KL (2002) Storm track dynamics. J Clim 15:2163–2183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charney JG (1947) The dynamics of long waves in a baroclinic westerly current. J Meteorol 4:135–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen G, Lu J, Frierson DM (2008) Phase speed spectra and the latitude of surface westerlies: interannual variability and global warming trend. J Clim 21:5942–5959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delworth TL et al (2006) GFDL’s CM2 global coupled climate models. Part I. Formulation and simulation characteristics. J Clim 19:643–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eady ET (1949) Long waves and cyclone waves. Tellus 1:33–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emanuel KA, Fantini M, Thorpe AJ (1987) Baroclinic instability in an environment of small stability to slantwise moist convection. Part I. Two-dimensional models. J Atmos Sci 44:1559–1573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frierson DMW, Held IM, Zurita-Gotor P (2006) A gray-radiation aquaplanet moist GCM. Part I. Static stability and eddy scale. J Atmos Sci 63:2548–2566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frierson DMW, Held IM, Zurita-Gotor P (2007) A gray-radiation aquaplanet moist GCM. Part II. Energy transports in altered climates. J Atmos Sci 64:1680–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fyfe JC (2003) Extratropical Southern Hemisphere cyclones: Harbingers of climate change. J Clim 16:2802–2805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gastineau G, Soden BJ (2009) Model projected changes of extreme wind events in response to global warming. Geophys Res Lett 36:L10 810. doi: 10.1029/2009GL037500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geng Q, Sugi M, (2003) Possible change of extratropical cyclone activity due to enhanced greenhouse gases and sulfate aerosols—study with a high-resolution AGCM. J Clim 16:2262–2274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green JSA (1970) Transfer properties of the large-scale eddies and the general circulation of the atmosphere. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 96:157–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gregory JM, Mitchell JFB, Brady AJ (1996) Summer drought in Northern Midlatitudes in a time-dependent CO2 climate experiment. J Clim 10:662–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall NMJ, Hoskins BJ, Valdes PJ, Senior CA (1994) Storm tracks in a high-resolution GCM with doubled carbon dioxide. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 120:1209–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen JE, Lacis A, Rind D, Russell G, Stone P, Fung I, Ruedy R, Lerner J (1984) Climate sensitivity: analysis of feedback mechanisms. In: Hansen JE, Takahashi T (eds) Climate processes and climate sensitivity, AGU Geophysical Monograph 29, Maurice Ewing vol 5. American Geophysical Union, pp 130–163Google Scholar
  20. Harnik N, Lindzen RS (1997) The effect of basic-state potential vorticity gradients on the growth of baroclinic waves and the height of the tropopause. J Atmos Sci 55:344–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hazeleger W, (2005) Can global warming affect tropical ocean heat transport?. Geophys Res Lett 32:L22 701. doi: 10.1029/2005GL023450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Held IM (1993) Large-scale dynamics and global warming. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 74:228–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Held IM, O’Brien E (1992) Quasigeostrophic turbulence in a three-layer model: effects of vertical structure in the mean shear. J Atmos Sci 49:1861–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Held IM, Soden BJ (2006) Robust response of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Clim 19:5686–5699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoskins BJ, Valdes PJ (1990) On the existence of storm-tracks. J Atmos Sci 47:1854–1864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kalnay E et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kunz T (2008) The role of breaking synoptic scale Rossby waves for the North Atlantic oscillation and its coupling with the stratosphere. Ph.D. thesis, der Universitat HamburgGoogle Scholar
  28. Lambert SJ (1995) The effect of enhanced greenhouse warming on winter cyclone frequencies and strengths. J Clim 8:1447–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lambert SJ, Fyfe JC (2006) Changes in winter cyclones frequencies and strengths simulated in enhanced greenhouse warming experiments: results from the models participating in the IPCC diagnostic exercise. Clim Dyn 26:713–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lapeyre G, Held IM (2004) The role of moisture in the dynamics and energetics of turbulent baroclinic eddies. J Atmos Sci 61:1693–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levitus S, Antonov JI, Wang J, Delworth TL, Dixon KW, Broccoli AJ (2001) Anthropogenic warming of earth’s climate system. Sci 292:267–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin SJ (2004) A vertically Lagrangian finite-volume dynamical core for global models. Mon Wea Rev 132: 2293–2307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindzen RS, Farrell BF (1980) A simple approximation result for maximum growth rate of baroclinic instabilities. J Atmos Sci 37:1648–1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lorenz EN (1955) Available potential energy and the maintenance of the general circulation. Tellus 7:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lorenz DJ, DeWeaver ET (2007) Tropopause height and zonal wind response to global warming in the IPCC scenario integrations. J Geophys Res 112:D10 119. doi: 10.1029/2006JD008087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lu J, Vecchi GA, Reichler T (2007) Expansion of the Hadley cell under global warming. Geophys Res Lett 34:L06 805. doi: 10.1029/2006GL028443 Google Scholar
  37. Lunkeit F, Fraedrich K, Bauer SE (1998) Storm tracks in a warmer climate: sensitivity studies with a simplified global circulation model. Clim Dyn 14:813–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCabe GJ, Clark MP, Serreze MC (2001) Trends in Northern Hemisphere surface cyclone frequency and intensity. J Clim 14:2763–2768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meehl GA et al (2007) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Chap. 10, pp 747–846Google Scholar
  40. Nakamura H, Sampe T, Tanimoto Y, Shimpo A (2004) Observed associations among storm tracks, jet streams and midlatitude oceanic fronts, earth’s climate: the ocean–atmosphere interaction. In: Wang C, Xie S-P, Carton JA (eds) Geophys Monogr, 147, American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 329–346Google Scholar
  41. O’Gorman PA, Schneider T (2008) Energy of midlatitude transient eddies in idealized simulations of changed climates. J Clim 21:5797–5806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pavan V (1995) Sensitivity of a multi-layer quasi-geostrophic β-channel to the vertical structure of the equilibrium meridional temperature gradient. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 122:55–72Google Scholar
  43. Pavan V, Hall N, Valdes P, Blackburn M (1999) The importance of moisture distribution for the growth and energetics of mid-latitude systems. Ann Geophys 17:242–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Randel WJ, Held IM (1991) Phase speed spectra of transient eddy fluxes and critical layer absorption. J Atmos Sci 48:688–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Russell JL, Dixon KW, Gnanadesikan A, Stouffer RJ, Toggweiler JR (2006a) The Southern Hemisphere westerlies in a warming world: propping open the door to the deep ocean. J Clim 19:6382–6390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Russell JL, Souffer RJ, Dixon KW (2006b) Intercomparison of the Southern Ocean circulations in the IPCC coupled model control simulations. J Clim 19:4560–4575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seager R, Murtugudde R, Clement AC, Herweijer C (2003) Why is there an evaporation minimum at the Equator. J Clim 16:3792–3801Google Scholar
  48. Seager R, et al (2007) Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316: 1181–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seager R, Naik N, Vecchi G (2010) Thermodynamic and dynamic causes of large-scale changes in the hydrological cycle in response to global warming. J Clim (submitted)Google Scholar
  50. Seager R. Vecchi G (2010) Global warming and the 21st century climate of southwestern North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (submitted)Google Scholar
  51. Son S-W et al (2008) The impact of stratospheric ozone recovery on the Southern Hemisphere westerly jet. Science 320: 1486–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Son S-W, Tandon NF, Polvani LM, Waugh DW (2009) Ozone hole and Southern Hemisphere climate change. Geophys Res Lett 36:L15 705. doi: 10.1029/2009GL038671 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stephenson DB, Held IM, (1993) GCM response of northern winter stationary waves and storm tracks to increasing amounts of carbon dioxide. J Clim 6:1859–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Trenberth KE, Caron JM (2001) Estimates of meridional atmosphere and ocean heat transports. J Clim 14:3433–3443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Trenberth KE, Stepaniak DP (2003) Seamless poleward atmospheric energy transports and implications for the Hadley circulation. J Clim 16:3705–3721Google Scholar
  56. Trenberth KE, Caron JM, Stepaniak DP (2001) The atmospheric energy budget and implications for surface fluxes and ocean heat transports. Clim Dyn 17:259–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Trenberth KE, Fasullo JT, Kiehl J (2009) Earth’s global energy budget. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vallis GK, (2006) Atmospheric and oceanic fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wittman MAH, Charlton AJ, Polvani LM (2007) The effect of lower stratospheric shear on baroclinic instability. J Atmos Sci 64:479–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yin H (2005) A consistent poleward shift of the storm tracks in simulations of 21st century climate. Geophys Res Lett 32: L18 701. doi: 10.1029/2005GL023684 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yutian Wu
    • 1
  • Mingfang Ting
    • 2
  • Richard Seager
    • 2
  • Huei-Ping Huang
    • 3
  • Mark A. Cane
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied Physics and Applied MathematicsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Lamont-Doherty Earth ObservatoryColumbia UniversityPalisadesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations