Climate Dynamics

, Volume 32, Issue 7–8, pp 1003–1014 | Cite as

Precipitation interannual variability in South America from the WCRP-CMIP3 multi-model dataset

Article

Abstract

The ability of coupled climate models from the WCRP-CMIP3 multi-model dataset to reproduce the interannual seasonal variability of precipitation in South America and the influence of the Southern Annular Mode (SAM) and El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on such variability is examined. Models are able to reproduce the northward migration of the precipitation variability maximum during autumn and winter and its later return towards the south during spring and summer as well as the high variability throughout the year in southern Chile. Nevertheless, most of them have problems in representing accurately the variability associated with the South Atlantic convergence zone during summer and the typical maximum of variability in the subtropical continent during autumn and winter. The annular-like structure characteristic of the SAM influence on the Southern Hemisphere circulation is basically simulated by all models, but they have serious deficiencies in representing the observed relationship between SAM and both precipitation and circulation anomalies in South America. In addition, most of the models are not able to reproduce the typical wavetrains observed in the circulation anomalies in the Southern Hemisphere associated to ENSO. Only few models, previously identified as those with reasonable ENSO representation at the equatorial Pacific, have evidences of such wavetrains. Coherently, they exhibit the best representation of the ENSO signal in the South American precipitation. Results show that considerable improvement in the model representation of the climate variability in South America and in the associated large-scale teleconnections is still needed.

Keywords

South American climate Coupled climate models WCRP-CMIP3 multi-model dataset Southern Annular Mode ENSO events 

References

  1. AchutaRao K, Sperber K (2006) ENSO simulation in coupled ocean-atmosphere models: are the current models better? Clim Dyn. doi:10.1007/s00382-006-0119-7
  2. Carvalho L, Ch Jones, Ambrizzi T (2005) Opposite phases of the Antarctic oscillation and relationships with intraseasonal to interannual activity in the tropics during the Austral summer. J Clim 18:702–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dai A (2006) Precipitation characteristics in eighteen coupled climate models. J Clim 19:4605–4630. doi:10.1175/JCLI3884.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delworth T et al (2006) GFDL’s CM2 global coupled climate models––part 1: formulation and simulation characteristics. J Clim 19:643–674Google Scholar
  5. Ghil M, Mo K (1991) Intraseasonal oscillations in the global atmosphere. Part II: Southern hemisphere. J Atmos Sci 48:780–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gong D, Wang S (1999) Definition of Antarctic oscillation index. Geophys Res Lett 26(4):459–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grimm A, Barros V, Doyle M (2000) Climate variability in southern South America associated with El Niño and La Niña events. J Clim 13:35–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guilyardi E (2006) El Niño-mean state-seasonal cycle interactions in a multi-model ensemble. Clim Dyn 26:329–348. doi:10.1007/s00382-005-0084-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hasumi H et al (2004) K-1 coupled GCM (MIRCO) description. K-1 technical report no. 1, 34 pp. Available at http://www.ccsr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/kyosei/hasumi/MIROC/techrepo.pdf
  10. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 996 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Joseph R, Nigam S (2006) ENSO evolution and teleconnections in IPCC’s twentieth-century climate simulations: realistic representation? J Clim 19:4360–4377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kalnay E et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR reanalysis 40-year project. Bull Am Meteor Soc 77:437–471Google Scholar
  13. Karoly D (1989) Southern hemisphere circulation features associated with El Niño––Southern oscillation events. J Clim 2:1239–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leloup J, Lengaigne M, Boulanger J-P (2008) Twentieth century ENSO characteristics in the IPCC database. Clim Dyn 30:277–291. doi:10.1007/s00382-007-0284-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marti O et al (2005) The new IPSL climate system model: IPSL-CM4. Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Paris, 84 pp. Available at http://dods.ipsl.jussieu.fr/omamce/IPSLCM4/DocIPSLCM4/FILES/DocIPSLCM4_color.pdf
  16. Miller R, Schmidt G, Shindell D (2006) Forced annular variations in the 20th century intergovernmental panel on climate change fourth assessment report models. J Geophys Res 111:D18101. doi:10.1029/2005JD006323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mo K (2000) Relationships between low-frequency variability in the Southern hemisphere and sea surface temperature anomalies. J Clim 13:3599–3620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Raphael M, Holland M (2006) Twentieth century simulation of the Southern hemisphere climate in coupled models. Part 1: large scale circulation variability. Clim Dyn 26:217–228. doi:10.1007/s00382-005-0082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roeckner E et al (2003) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5. Part I: model description. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Rep. vol 349, 127 pp. Available at MPI for Meteorology, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  20. Salas-Mélia D, Chauvin F, Déqué M, Douville H, Gueremy J, Marquet P, Planton S, Royer J, Tyteca S (2005) Description and validation of the CNRM-CM3 global coupled model. CNRM working note 103Google Scholar
  21. Schmidt G et al (2006) Present day atmospheric simulations using GISS model E: comparison to in situ, satellite and reanalysis data. J Clim 19:153–192Google Scholar
  22. Silvestri G, Vera C (2003) Antarctic oscillation signal on precipitation anomalies over southeastern South America. Geophys Res Lett 30(21). doi:10.1029/2003GL018277
  23. Thompson D, Wallace J (2000) Annular modes in the extratropical circulation, part I: month-to-month variability. J Clim 13:1000–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vera C, Silvestri G, Barros V, Carril A (2004) Differences in El Niño response over the Southern hemisphere. J Clim 17:1741–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vera C, Silvestri G, Liebmann B, González P (2006a) Climate change scenarios for seasonal precipitation in South America from IPCC-AR4 models. Geophys Res Lett 33:L13707. doi:10.1029/2006GL025759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vera C, Higgins W, Amador J, Ambrizzi T, Garreaud R, Gochis D, Gutzler D, Lettenmaier D, Marengo J, Mechoso C, Nogues-Paegle J, Silva Dias P, Zhang C (2006b) Toward a unified view of the American monsoon systems. J Clim 19:4977–5000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xie P, Arkin P (1997) Global precipitation: a 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model outputs. Bull Am Meteor Soc 78:2539–2558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yukimoto S, Noda A, Kitoh A, Hosaka M, Yoshimura H, Uchiyama T, Shibata K, Arakawa O, Kusunoki S (2006) Present-day climate and climate sensitivity in the Meteorological Research Institute coupled GCM version 2.3 (MRI-CGCM2.3). J Meteor Soc Jpn 84:333–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhou J, Lau K (2001) Principal modes of interannual and decadal variability of summer rainfall over South America. Int J Climatol 21:1623–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DCAO, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Centro de Investigaciones del Mar y la Atmósfera (CIMA)/CONICET-UBAUniversidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations