The CLIVAR C20C project: skill of simulating Indian monsoon rainfall on interannual to decadal timescales. Does GHG forcing play a role?
The ability of atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs), that are forced with observed sea surface temperatures (SSTs), to simulate the Indian monsoon rainfall (IMR) variability on interannual to decadal timescales is analyzed in a multimodel intercomparison. The multimodel ensemble has been performed within the CLIVAR International “Climate of the 20th Century” (C20C) Project. This paper is part of a C20C intercomparison of key climate time series. Whereas on the interannual timescale there is modest skill in reproducing the observed IMR variability, on decadal timescale the skill is much larger. It is shown that the decadal IMR variability is largely forced, most likely by tropical sea surface temperatures (SSTs), but as well by extratropical and especially Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) related SSTs. In particular there has been a decrease from the late 1950s to the 1990s that corresponds to a general warming of tropical SSTs. Using a selection of control integrations from the World Climate Research Programme’s (WCRP’s) Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3 (CMIP3), it is shown that the increase of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the twentieth century has not significantly contributed to the observed decadal IMR variability.
KeywordsClimate variability Multimodel ensembles Indian monsoon ENSO–monsoon relation Interannual-to-decadal predictability
- Folland CK, Shukla J, Kinter J, Rodwell MJ (2002) The climate of the twentieth century project. CLIVAR Exchanges 7(2):37–39Google Scholar
- Hegerl GC, Zwiers FW, Braconnot P, Gillett NP, Luo Y, Marengo Orsini JA, Nicholls N, Penner JE, Stott PA (2007) Understanding and attributing climate change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Hurrell JW, Hoerling MP, Phillips AS, Xu T (2004) Twentieth century North Atlantic climate change. Part I: Assessing determinism. Clim Dyn 23(3–4):371–389Google Scholar
- Keenlyside NS, Latif M, Jungclaus J, Kornblueh L, Roeckner E (2008) Advancing decadal-scale climate prediction in the North Atlantic sector. Nature 453. doi:10.1038/nature06921
- Parthasarathy B, Munot AA, Kothawale DR (1995) Monthly and seasonal rainfall series for All-India homogeneous regions and meteorological subdivisions: 1871–1994. Contributions from Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Research Report RR-065, August 1995, PuneGoogle Scholar
- Scaife AA, Kucharski F, Folland CK, Kinter J, Fereday D, Fischer A, Grainger S, Jin K, Knight JR, Kusunoki S, Nath MJ, Nakaegawa T, Pegion P, Schubert S, Sporyshev P, Syktus J, Voldaire A, Yoon JH, Zhou T (2008) The CLIVAR C20C project: selected 20th century climate events. Climate Dyn (submitted)Google Scholar
- Wang B, Ding Q, FuX, Kang I-S, Jin K, Shukla J, Doblas-Reyes F (2005) Fundamental challenge in simulation and prediction of summer monsoon rainfall. Geophys Res Lett 32. doi:10.1029/2005GL022734
- Zhou T, Wu B, Scaife AA, Li L, Fischer A, Voldaire A, Wang B, Folland CK, Fereday D, Kucharski F, Kinter J, Jin KE, Nath MJ, Lau N-C, Pegion P, Kusunoki S, Nakaegawa T, Syktus J (2008) The CLIVAR C20C Project: Which components of the Asian-Australian Monsoon variability are forced and reproducible? Climate Dyn (submitted)Google Scholar