Climate Dynamics

, Volume 32, Issue 7–8, pp 1065–1079 | Cite as

The three dimensional structure of the atmospheric energy budget: methodology and evaluation

Article

Abstract

Studies of the vertically-integrated energy and moisture budgets of the atmosphere are expanded to three dimensions. The vertical integrals of the moisture, energy and heat budget equations computed analytically act as a very strong constraint on any local computational results of the vertical structure. This paper focuses on the methodology and difficulties in closing the budgets and satisfying constraints, given the need to use a pressure coordinate because model coordinates all differ. Vertical interpolation destroys delicate mass balances and can lead to inconsistencies, such as from how geopotential or vertical motion is computed. Using the advective rather than flux form of the equations greatly reduces the contamination from these effects. Results are documented for January 1989 using European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts reanalysis (ERA-40) data. The moistening, diabatic heating and total energy forcing of the atmosphere are computed as a residual from the analyses using the moisture, dry energy (dry static energy plus kinetic energy) and total atmospheric (moist static plus kinetic) energy equations. The components from the monthly averaged flow and transients, as a function of layer in the atmosphere, and as quasi-horizontal and vertical fluxes of dry static, latent and kinetic energy are examined. Results show the moistening of the atmosphere at the surface, its release as latent heat in precipitation and transformation into dry static energy, and thus net radiative cooling as a function of height and location. The vertically integrated forcings computed from the model parameterizations are compared with available observations and budget-derived values, and large ERA-40 model biases are revealed in radiation and precipitation. The energy and moisture budget-derived quantities are more realistic, although results depend on the quality of the analyses which are not constructed to conserve mass, moisture or energy, owing to analysis increments.

Keywords

Atmospheric energy Atmospheric moisture Atmospheric vertical structure Reanalyses Model biases 

References

  1. Adler RF, Huffman GJ, Chang A, Ferraro R, Xie P, Janowiak J, Rudolf B, Schneider U, Curtis S, Bolvin D, Gruber A, Susskind J, Arkin P, Nelkin E (2003) The version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979–present). J Hydrometeor 4:1147–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boville BA (1985) The thermal balance of the NCAR Community Climate Model. J Atmos Sci 42:695–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fasullo JT, Trenberth KE (2008a) The annual cycle of the energy budget: global mean and land-ocean exchanges. J Clim 21 (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Fasullo JT, Trenberth KE (2008b) The annual cycle of the energy budget: Meridional structures and poleward transports. J Clim 21 (in press)Google Scholar
  5. Hoskins BJ, Sardeshmukh PD (1987) A diagnostic study of the dynamics of the Northern Hemisphere winter of 1985–86. Q J R Meteorol Soc 113:759–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007. The physical science basis. Contribution of WG 1 to the 4th assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis MC, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 996 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson RH, Ciesielski PE (2000) Rainfall and radiative heating rates from TOGA COARE atmospheric budgets. J Atmos Sci 57:1497–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Li L, Ingersoll AP, Jiang X, Feldman D, Yung Y (2007) Lorenz energy cycle of the global atmosphere based on reanalysis datasets. Geophys Res Lett 34:L16813. doi:10.1029/2007GL029985
  9. Tian B, Zhang GJ, Ramanathan V (2001) Heat balance in the Pacific Warm Pool atmosphere during TOGA COARE and CEPEX. J Clim 14:1881–1893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Trenberth KE (1991a) Climate diagnostics from global analyses: conservation of mass in ECMWF analyses. J Clim 4:707–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Trenberth KE (1991b) Storm tracks in the southern hemisphere. J Atmos Sci 48:2159–2178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Trenberth KE (1997) Using atmospheric budgets as a constraint on surface fluxes. J Clim 10:2796–2809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Trenberth KE, Fasullo J (2008) An observational estimate of ocean energy divergence. J Phys Oceanogr (in press)Google Scholar
  14. Trenberth KE, Smith L (2006) The vertical structure of temperature in the tropics: different flavors of El Niño. J Clim 19:4956–4970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Trenberth KE, Stepaniak DP (2002) A pathological problem with NCEP reanalyses in the stratosphere. J Clim 15:690–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Trenberth KE, Stepaniak DP (2003a) Co-variability of components of poleward atmospheric energy transports on seasonal and interannual timescales. J Clim 16:3691–3705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Trenberth KE, Stepaniak DP (2003b) Seamless poleward atmospheric energy transports and implications for the Hadley circulation. J Clim 16:3706–3722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Trenberth KE, Stepaniak DP (2004) The flow of energy through the Earth’s climate system. 2004. Q J R Meteor Soc 130:2677–2701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Trenberth KE, Caron JM, Stepaniak DP (2001) The atmospheric energy budget and implications for surface fluxes and ocean heat transports. Clim Dyn 17:259–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Trenberth KE, Fasullo J, Smith L (2005) Trends and variability in column-integrated water vapor. Clim Dyn 24:741–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Trenberth KE, Hurrell JW, Solomon A (1995) Conservation of mass in three dimensions. J Clim 8:692–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Trenberth KE, Stepaniak DP, Caron JM (2000) The global monsoon as seen through the divergent atmospheric circulation. J Clim 13:3969–3993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Trenberth KE, Stepaniak DP, Caron JM (2002a) Accuracy of atmospheric energy budgets from analyses. J Clim 15:3343–3360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Trenberth KE, Stepaniak DP, Caron JM (2002b) Interannual variations in the atmospheric heat budget. J Geophys Res 107:D8. doi:10.1029/2000JD000297
  25. Trenberth KE, Caron JM, Stepaniak DP, Worley S (2002c) The evolution of El Niño Southern Oscillation and global atmospheric surface temperatures. J Geophys Res 107:D8. doi:10.1029/2000JD000298
  26. Trenberth KE., Smith L, Qian T, Dai A, Fasullo J (2007) Estimates of the global water budget and its annual cycle using observational and model data. J Hydrometeor 8:758–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Uppala SM, Kållberg PW, Simmons AJ, Andrae U, da Costa Bechtold V, Fiorino M, Gibson JK, Haseler J, Hernandez A, Kelly GA, Li X, Onogi K, Saarinen S, Sokka N, Allan RP, Andersson E, Arpe K, Balmaseda MA, Beljaars ACM, van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Caires S, Dethof A, Dragosavac M, Fisher M, Fuentes M, Hagemann S, Hólm E, Hoskins BJ, Isaksen L, Janssen PAEM, McNally AP, Mahfouf J-F, Jenne R, Morcrette J-J, Rayner NA, Saunders RW, Simon P, Sterl A, Trenberth KE, Untch A, Vasiljevic D, Viterbo P, Woollen J (2005) The ERA-40 reanalysis. Q J R Meteor Soc 131:2961–3012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yanai M, Esbensen S, Chu J-H (1973) Determination of bulk properties of tropical cloud clusters from large-scale heat and moisture budgets. J Atmos Sci 30:611–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yanai M, Chu J-H, Stark TE, Nitta T (1976) Response of deep and shallow tropical maritime cumuli to large-scale processes. J Atmos Sci 33:976–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yanai M, Tomita T (1998) Seasonal and interannual variability of atmospheric heat sources and moisture sinks as determined from NCEP-NCAR reanalyses. J Clim 11:463–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yu R, Zhang M, Cess RD (1999) Analysis of the atmospheric energy budget: a consistency study of available data sets. J Geophys Res 104:9655–9661CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations