Projected changes in drought occurrence under future global warming from multi-model, multi-scenario, IPCC AR4 simulations
- 4.4k Downloads
Recent and potential future increases in global temperatures are likely to be associated with impacts on the hydrologic cycle, including changes to precipitation and increases in extreme events such as droughts. We analyze changes in drought occurrence using soil moisture data for the SRES B1, A1B and A2 future climate scenarios relative to the PICNTRL pre-industrial control and 20C3M twentieth century simulations from eight AOGCMs that participated in the IPCC AR4. Comparison with observation forced land surface model estimates indicates that the models do reasonably well at replicating our best estimates of twentieth century, large scale drought occurrence, although the frequency of long-term (more than 12-month duration) droughts are over-estimated. Under the future projections, the models show decreases in soil moisture globally for all scenarios with a corresponding doubling of the spatial extent of severe soil moisture deficits and frequency of short-term (4–6-month duration) droughts from the mid-twentieth century to the end of the twenty-first. Long-term droughts become three times more common. Regionally, the Mediterranean, west African, central Asian and central American regions show large increases most notably for long-term frequencies as do mid-latitude North American regions but with larger variation between scenarios. In general, changes under the higher emission scenarios, A1B and A2 are the greatest, and despite following a reduced emissions pathway relative to the present day, the B1 scenario shows smaller but still substantial increases in drought, globally and for most regions. Increases in drought are driven primarily by reductions in precipitation with increased evaporation from higher temperatures modulating the changes. In some regions, increases in precipitation are offset by increased evaporation. Although the predicted future changes in drought occurrence are essentially monotonic increasing globally and in many regions, they are generally not statistically different from contemporary climate (as estimated from the 1961–1990 period of the 20C3M simulations) or natural variability (as estimated from the PICNTRL simulations) for multiple decades, in contrast to primary climate variables, such as global mean surface air temperature and precipitation. On the other hand, changes in annual and seasonal means of terrestrial hydrologic variables, such as evaporation and soil moisture, are essentially undetectable within the twenty-first century. Changes in the extremes of climate and their hydrological impacts may therefore be more detectable than changes in their means.
KeywordsSoil Moisture Palmer Drought Severity Index Future Climate Scenario Drought Duration Variable Infiltration Capacity
This work was partly supported by U.S. Department of Energy grant 983338. We acknowledge the modeling groups for making their simulations available for analysis, the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) for collecting and archiving the CMIP3 model output, and the WCRP’s Working Group on Coupled Modeling (WGCM) for organizing the model data analysis activity. The WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset is supported by the Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy. We would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments that helped improve this work.
- Achuta Rao K, Sperber KR (2006) ENSO simulation in coupled ocean–atmosphere models: are the current models better? Clim Dyn. doi: 10.1007/s00382-006-0119-7
- Guo ZC, Dirmeyer PA (2006) Evaluation of the second global soil wetness project soil moisture simulations: 1. Intermodel comparison. J Geophys Res Atmos 111(D22):14Google Scholar
- IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. In: Houghton JT et al (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 944 ppGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 996 ppGoogle Scholar
- Jansen E, Overpeck J, Briffa KR, Duplessy J-C, Joos F, Masson-Delmotte V, Olago D, Otto-Bliesner B, Peltier WR, Rahmstorf S, Ramesh R, Raynaud D, Rind D, Solomina O, Villalba R, Zhang D (2007) Palaeoclimate. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell KE, 22 coauthors (2004) The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system. J Geophys Res 109:D07S90. doi: 10.1029/2003JD003823
- Nakićenović N, Davidson O, Davis G, Grübler A, Kram T, Rovere ELL, Metz B, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Sankovski A, Shukla P, Swart R, Watson R, Dadi Z (2000) Emissions scenarios—summary for policymakers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- NRC (2003) Understanding climate change feedbacks. Report of the Panel on Climate Change Feedbacks, National Research Council. National Academies Press, Washington, 166ppGoogle Scholar
- Wilhite DA (2000) Drought as a natural hazard: concepts and definitions. In: Wilhite DA (Ed) Drought: a global assessment. Routledge, New York, pp 3–18Google Scholar
- Wood EF, Lettenmaier DP, Liang X, Lohmann D, Boone A, Chang S, Chen F, Dai YJ, Dickinson RE, Duan QY, Ek M, Gusev YM, Habets F, Irannejad P, Koster R, Mitchell KE, Nasonova ON, Noilhan J, Schaake J, Schlosser A, Shao YP, Shmakin AB, Verseghy D, Warrach K, Wetzel P, Xue YK, Yang ZL, Zeng QC (1998) The project for intercomparison of land-surface parameterization schemes (PILPS) phase 2(c) Red-Arkansas River basin experiment: 1. Experiment description and summary intercomparisons. Global Planet Change 19:115–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar