Climate Dynamics

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 375–391 | Cite as

Dynamical greenhouse-plus feedback and polar warming amplification. Part II: meridional and vertical asymmetries of the global warming



This paper examines several prominent thermodynamic and dynamic factors responsible for the meridional and vertical warming asymmetries using a moist coupled atmosphere–surface radiative transportive four-box climate model. A coupled atmosphere–surface feedback analysis is formulated to isolate the direct response to an anthropogenic greenhouse gas forcing from individual local feedbacks (water vapor, evaporation, surface sensible heat flux, and ice-albedo), and from the non-local dynamical feedback. Both the direct response and response to water vapor feedback are stronger in low latitudes. The joint effect of the ice-albedo and dynamical greenhouse-plus feedbacks acts to amplify the high latitude surface warming whereas both the evaporation and dynamical greenhouse-minus feedbacks cause a reduction of the surface warming in low latitudes. The enhancement (reduction) of local feedbacks in high (low) latitudes in response to the non-local dynamic feedback further strengthens the polar amplification of the surface warming. Both the direct response and response to water vapor feedback lead to an increase of lapse rate in both low and high latitudes. The stronger total dynamic heating in the mean state in high latitudes is responsible for a larger increase of lapse rate in high latitudes in the direct response and response to water vapor feedback. The local evaporation and surface sensible heat flux feedbacks reduce the lapse rate both in low and high latitudes through cooling the surface and warming the atmosphere. The much stronger evaporation feedback leads to a final warming in low latitudes that is stronger in the atmosphere than the surface.



We are grateful for the constructive and valuable comments made by Ed Schneider, Peter Langen and an anonymous reviewer. This work was supported in part by NSF grants ATM-0403211 and ATM-0424799.


  1. Alexeev VA, Langen PL, Bates JR (2005) Polar amplification of surface warming on an aquaplanet in “ghost forcing” experiments without sea ice feedbacks. Clim Dyn 24:655–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates JR (1999) A dynamical stabilizer in the climate system: a mechanism suggested by a simple model. Tellus 51A:349–372Google Scholar
  3. Bony S et al. (2006) How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes? J Clim 19:3445–3482Google Scholar
  4. Cai M (2005) Dynamical amplification of polar warming. Geophys Res Lett 32 L22710. doi:10.1029/2005GL024481
  5. Cai M (2006) Dynamical greenhouse-plus feedback and polar warming amplification. Part I: a dry radiative-transportive climate model. Clim Dyn 26:661–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cess RD et al (1990) Intercomparison and interpretation of cloud-climate feedback processes in nineteen atmospheric general circulation models. J Geophys Res 95:16601–16615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clement A, Seager R, Cane MA, Zebiak SE (1996) An ocean dynamical thermostat. J Clim 9:2190–2196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall A (2004) The role of surface albedo feedback in climate. J Clim 17:1550–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall A, Qu X (2006) Using the current seasonal cycle to constrain snow albedo feedback in future climate change. Geophys Res Lett 33, L03502. doi:10.1029/2005GL025127
  10. Hartmann DL (1994) Global physical climatology. Academic, New York, pp 231–336Google Scholar
  11. Hartmann DL, Michelsen ML (1993) Large-scale effects on the regulation of tropical sea surface temperature. J Clim 6:2049–2062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hassol SJ (2004) Impacts of a warming arctic: arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 146Google Scholar
  13. Held IM, Soden BJ (2000) Water vapor feedback and global warming. Ann Rev Energy Environ 25:441–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoffert MI, Covey C (1992) Deriving global climate sensitivity from palaeoclimate reconstructions. Nature 360:573–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holland MM, Bitz CM (2003) Polar amplifications of climate change in coupled models. Clim Dyn 21:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Houghton JT et al (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 101–181Google Scholar
  17. Masson-Delmotte V et al (2006) Past and future polar amplification of climate change: climate model intercomparisons and ice-core constraints. Clim Dyn 26:513–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meehl GA, Washington WM, Santer BD et al. (2006) Climate change projections for the twenty-first century and climate change commitment in the CCSM3. J Clim 19:2597–2616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Newell RE (1979) Climate and the ocean. Am Sci 67:405–416Google Scholar
  20. North GR (1975) Theory of energy-balance climate models. J Atmos Sci 32:2033–2043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pierrehumbert RT (1995) Thermostats, radiator fins, and the local runaway greenhouse. J Atmos Sci 52:1784–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pierrehumbert RT (2002) The hydrological cycle in deep-time climate problems. Nature 419:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramanathan V, Collins W (1991) Thermodynamic regulation of warming by cirrus clouds deduced from observations of the 1987 El Nino. Nature 351:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schneider EK, Kirtman BP, Lindzen RS (1999) Tropospheric water vapor and climate sensitivity. J Atmos Sci 56:1649–1658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shine KP, Sinha A (1991) Sensitivity of the earth’s climate to height dependent changes in the water vapor mixing ratio. Nature 354:382–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Soden BJ, Held IM (2006) An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean-atmosphere models. J Clim 19:3354–3360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun, D-Z, Liu Z (1996) Dynamic ocean–atmosphere coupling: a thermostat for the tropics. Science 272:1148–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang MH, Hack JJ, Kiehland JT, Cess CD (1994) Diagnostic study of climate feedback processes in atmospheric general circulation models. J Geophys Res 99:5525–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MeteorologyFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations