Climate Dynamics

, Volume 28, Issue 7–8, pp 661–682

Evolution of model systematic errors in the Tropical Atlantic Basin from coupled climate hindcasts

Article

Abstract

Significant systematic errors in the tropical Atlantic Ocean are common in state-of-the-art coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation models. In this study, a set of ensemble hindcasts from the NCEP coupled forecast system (CFS) is used to examine the initial growth of the coupled model bias. These CFS hindcasts are 9-month integrations starting from perturbed real-time oceanic and atmospheric analyses for 1981–2003. The large number of integrations from a variety of initial states covering all months provides a good opportunity to examine how the model systematic errors grow. The monthly climatologies of ensemble hindcasts from various initial months are compared with both observed and analyzed oceanic and atmospheric datasets. Our analyses show that two error patterns are dominant in the hindcasts. One is the warming of the sea surface temperature (SST) in the southeastern tropical Atlantic Ocean. This error grows faster in boreal summer and fall and peaks in November–December at round 2°C in the open ocean. It is caused by an excessive model surface shortwave radiative flux in this region, especially from boreal summer to fall. The excessive radiative forcing is in turn caused by the CFS inability to reproduce the observed amount of low cloud cover in the southeastern ocean and its seasonal increase. According to a comparison between the seasonal climatologies from the CFS hindcasts and a long-term simulation of the atmospheric model forced with observed SST, the CFS low cloud and radiation errors are inherent to its atmospheric component. On the other hand, the SST error in CFS is a major cause of the model’s southward bias of the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) in boreal winter and spring. An analysis of the SST errors of the 6-month ensemble hindcasts by seven coupled models in the Development of a European Multimodel Ensemble System for Seasonal-to-Interannual Prediction project shows that this SST error pattern is common in coupled climate hindcasts. The second error pattern is an excessive deepening of the model thermocline depth to the north of the equator from the western coast toward the central ocean. This error grows fastest in boreal summer. It is forced by an overly strong local anticyclonic surface wind stress curl and is in turn related to the weakened northeast trade winds in summer and fall. The thermocline error in the northwest delays the annual shoaling of the equatorial thermocline in the Gulf of Guinea remotely through the equatorial waveguide.

References

  1. Behringer DW, Xue Y (2004) Evaluation of the global ocean data assimilation system at NCEP: the Pacific Ocean. In: Eighth symposium on integrated observing and assimilation systems for atmosphere, ocean, land surface. AMS 84th Annual Meeting, Seattle, Washington, January 11–15Google Scholar
  2. Bretherton CS, Uttal T, Fairall CW, Yuter SE, Weller RA, Baumgardner D, Comstock K, Wood R, Raga GB (2004) The Epic 2001 stratocumulus study. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85:967–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carton JA, Chang C-Y, Grodsky S, Nigam S, Wang J (2005) Relationship of the tropical Atlantic to West African rainfall in the NCEP coupled model. US CLIVAR Atlantic Science Conference, January 31–February 2, 2005, Rosensthiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science at the University of Miami, MiamiGoogle Scholar
  4. Chou S-H, Nelkin E, Ardizzone J, Atlas R, Shie C-L (2003) Surface turbulent heat and momentum fluxes over global oceans based on the Goddard satellite retrievals, version 2 (GSSTF2). J Clim 16:3256–3273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davey M, Huddleston M, Sperber K, Braconnot P, Bryan F, Chen D, Colman R, Cooper C, Cubasch U, Delecluse P, DeWitt D, Fairhead L, Flato G, Gordon C, Hogan T, Ji M, Kimoto M, Kitoh A, Knutson T, Latif M, Le Treut H, Li T, Manabe S, Mechoso C, Meehl G, Power S, Roeckner E, Terray L, Vintzileos A, Voss R, Wang B, Washington W, Yoshikawa I, Yu J, Yukimoto S, Zebiak S (2002) STOIC: a study of coupled model climatology and variability in tropical ocean regions. Clim Dyn 18:403–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garzoli SL, Katz EJ (1983) The forced annual reversal of the Atlantic North Equatorial Countercurrent. J Phys Oceanogr 13:2082–2090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gordon CT, Rosati A, Gudgel R (2000) Tropical sensitivity of a coupled model to specified ISCCP low clouds. J Clim 13:2239–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gudgel RG, Rosati A, Gordon CT (2001) The sensitivity of a coupled atmospheric–oceanic GCM to prescribed low-level clouds over the ocean and tropical landmasses. Mon Weather Rev 129:2103–2115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang B, Hu Z-Z (2006) Cloud-SST feedback in southeastern tropical Atlantic anomalous events. J Geophys Res (in press)Google Scholar
  10. Huang B, Shukla J (2005) Ocean–atmosphere interactions in the tropical and subtropical Atlantic Ocean. J Clim 18:1652–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang B (2004) Remotely forced variability in the tropical Atlantic Ocean. Clim Dyn 23:133–152, doi:10.1007/s00382-004-0443-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang B, Schopf PS, Shukla J (2004) Intrinsic ocean–atmosphere variability in the tropical Atlantic Ocean. J. Clim 17:2058–2077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang B, Schneider EK (1995) The response of an ocean general circulation model to surface wind stress produced by an atmospheric general circulation model. Mon Weather Rev 123:3059–3085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu Z-Z, Huang B (2006) The predictive skill and the most predictable pattern in the tropical Atlantic: the effect of ENSO. Mon Weather Rev (in press)Google Scholar
  15. Kalnay E. Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Jenne R, Joseph D (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen WJ, Yang S-K, Hnilo JJ, Fiorino M, Potter GL (2002) NCEP–DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1631–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ma CC, Mechoso CR, Robertson AW, Arakawa A (1996) Peruvian stratus clouds and the tropical Pacific circulation: a coupled ocean–atmosphere GCM study. J Clim 9:1635–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mayer D, Molinari RL, Festa JF (1998) The mean and annual cycle of upper layer temperature fields in relation to Sverdrup dynamics within the gyres of the Atlantic Ocean. J Geophys Res 103:18545–18566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mechoso CR, Robertson AW, Barth N, Davey MK, Delecluse P, Gent PR, Ineson S, Kirtman B, Latif M, Le Treut H, Nagai T, Neelin JD, Philander SGH, Polcher J, Schopf PS, Stockdale T, Suarez MJ, Terray L, Thual O, Tribbia JJ (1995) The seasonal cycle over the tropical Pacific in coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation models. Mon Weather Rev 123:2825–2838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meehl GA, Arblaster JM (1998) The Asian-Australian monsoon and El Niño-Southern Oscillation in the NCAR climate system model. J Clim 11:1356–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Merle J, Arnault S (1985) Seasonal variability of the surface dynamic topography in the tropical Atlantic Ocean. J Mar Res 43:267–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Neelin JD, Latif M, Allaart MAF, Cane MA, Cubasch U, Gates WL, Gent PR, Ghil M, Gordon C, Lau NC, Mechoso CR, Meehl GA, Oberhuber JM, Philander SGH, Schopf PS, Sperber KR, Sterl KR, Tokioka T, Tribbia J, Zebiak SE (1992) Tropical air–sea interaction in general circulation models. Clim Dyn 7:73–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pacanowski RC, Griffies SM (1998) MOM 3.0 manual, NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  24. Palmer TN, Alessandri A, Andersen U, Cantelaube P, Davey M, Délécluse P, Déqué M, Díez E, Doblas-Reyes FJ, Feddersen H, Graham R, Gualdi S, Guérémy JF, Hagedorn R, Hoshen M, Keenlyside N, Latif M, Lazar A, Maisonnave E, Marletto V, Morse AP, Orfila B, Rogel P, Terres JM, Thomson MC (2004) Development of a European multimodel ensemble system for seasonal-to-interannual prediction. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85:853–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peng P, Zhang Q, Kumar A, van den Dool H, Wang W, Saha S, Pan H (2004) Variability, predictability, and prediction of DJF climate in NCEP Coupled Forecast System (CFS). In: Proceedings of the 29th climate prediction and diagnostics workshop. MadisonGoogle Scholar
  26. Philander SGH, Gu D, Lambert G, Li T, Halpern D, Lau N-C, Pacanowski RC (1996) Why the ITCZ is mostly north of the equator. J Clim 9:2958–2972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reynolds RW, Rayner NA, Smith TM, Stokes DC, Wang W (2002) An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate. J Clim 15:1609–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rossow WB, Dueñas EN (2004) The international satellite cloud climatology project (ISCCP) web site: an online resource for research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85:167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saha S, Nadiga S, Thiaw C, Wang J, Wang W, Zhang Q, van den Dool HM, Pan H-L, Moorthi S, Behringer D, Stokes D, Pena M, Lord S, White G, Ebisuzaki W, Peng P, Xie P (2006) The NCEP climate forecast system. J Clim 19:3483–3517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schneider EK, Kirtman BP, Fan Y, Zhu Z (2001) Retrospective ENSO forecasts: the effect of ocean resolution. COLA technical report, vol 109, 27ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Schneider EK, Zhu Z, Giese BS, Huang B, Kirtman BP, Shukla J, Carton JA (1997) Annual cycle and ENSO in a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. Mon Weather Rev 125:680–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schopf PS, Loughe A (1995) A reduced gravity isopycnal ocean model: Hindcasts of El Niño. Mon Weather Rev 123:2839–2863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith TM Reynolds RW, Livezey RE, Stokes DC (1996) Reconstruction of historical sea surface temperatures using empirical orthogonal functions. J Clim 9:1403–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Uppala SM, Kållberg PW, Simmons AJ, Andrae U, da Costa Bechtold V, Fiorino M, Gibson JK, Haseler J, Hernandez A, Kelly GA, Li X, Onogi K, Saarinen S, Sokka N, Allan RP, Andersson E, Arpe K, Balmaseda MA, Beljaars ACM, van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Caires S, Chevallier F, Dethof A, Dragosavac M, Fisher M, Fuentes M, Hagemann S, Hólm E, Hoskins BJ, Isaksen L, Janssen PAEM, Jenne R, McNally AP, Mahfouf J-F, Morcrette J-J, Rayner NA, Saunders RW, Simon P, Sterl A, Trenberth KE, Untch A, Vasiljevic D, Viterbo P, Woollen J (2005) The ERA-40 re-analysis. Quart J R Meteorol Soc 131:2961–3012, doi:10.1256/qj.04.176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang W, Saha S, Pan H-L, Nadiga S, White G (2005) Simulation of ENSO in the new NCEP coupled forecast system model (CFS03). Mon Weather Rev 133:1574–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xie P (2005) Searching into the cause of southward displacement of ITCZ in CFS simulation. http://www.nws.noaa.gov/ost/climate/STIP/CFS_news_071505.htm
  37. Xie P, Arkin PA (1996) Analyses of global monthly precipitation using gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model predictions. J Clim 9:840–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yu J-Y, Mechoso CR (1999) Links between annual variations of Peruvian stratus clouds and of SST in the eastern equatorial Pacific. J Clim 12:3305–3318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang Y, Rossow WB, Lacis AA (2004) Calculation of radiative fluxes from the surface to top of atmosphere based ISCCP and other global data sets: refinements of the radiative transfer model and the input data. J Geophys Res 109, doi:10.1029/2003JD004457Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Climate Dynamics, College of ScienceGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere StudiesInstitute of Global Environment and SocietyCalvertonUSA
  3. 3.RSIS/Climate Prediction CenterNational Centers for Environmental Prediction/NOAACamp SpringsUSA

Personalised recommendations