Climate Dynamics

, Volume 26, Issue 7–8, pp 713–728 | Cite as

Changes in winter cyclone frequencies and strengths simulated in enhanced greenhouse warming experiments: results from the models participating in the IPCC diagnostic exercise



The effect of enhanced greenhouse warming on the behaviour of mid-latitude cyclones is examined for changes in the total number of cyclone events and for changes in the number of intense events using the daily averaged mean sea level pressure simulated by coupled climate models participating in the IPCC AR4 (Fourth Assessment Report) diagnostic exercise. Results are presented for a set of scenarios which were produced using a wide range of increasing levels of greenhouse gases. For the enhanced greenhouse warming experiments, the models simulated a reduction in the total number of events and an increase in the number of intense events. This is a robust result, which essentially all the models exhibit. Comparison of the results for each of the scenarios shows that the magnitude of the changes in the number of simulated events increases with increasing levels greenhouse gas forcing used in the scenarios. Even though the numbers of events change, there is no apparent change seen in the geographical distribution of the events, i.e. there is no obvious change in the positions of the storm tracks seen on hemispheric charts. This was also evident in the results for the filtered variance of the meridional wind which was used as a proxy for cyclone activity. In spite of this, it is possible that small shifts in the storm tracks, which are difficult to resolve with the relatively coarse grid used for analysis, could occur.


  1. Bleck R (2002) An oceanic general circulation model framed in hybrid isopycnic-cartesian coordinates. Ocean Model 4:55–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boer GJ, McFarlane NA, Lazare M (1992) Greenhouse gas-induced climate change simulated with the CCC second generation general circulation model. J Climate 5:1045–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Delworth TL, Broccoli AJ, Rosati A, Stouffer RJ, Balaji V, Beelsey JA, Cooke WF, Dixon KW, Dunne J, Dunne KA, Durachta JW, Findell KL, Ginoux P, Gnanadesikan A, Gordon CT, Griffies SM, Gudgel R, Harrison MJ, Held IM, Hemler RS, Horowitz LW, Klein SA, Knutson TR, Kushner PJ, Langenhorst AR, Lee H-C, Lin S-J, Lu J, Malyshev SL, Milly PCD, Ramaswamy V, Russell J, Schwarzkopf MD, Shevliakova E, Sirutis JJ, Spelman MJ, Stern WF, Winton M, Wittenberg AT, Wyman B, Zeng F, Zhang R (2005) GFDL’s CM2 global coupled climate models. Part I: formulation and simulation characteristics. J Climate (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Diansky NA, Volodin EM (2002) Simulation of present day climate with a coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation model. Izv Atmos Ocean Phys (English Translation) 36(6):732–747Google Scholar
  5. Gnanadesikan A, Griffies SM, Dixon K, Balaji V, Barreiro M, Beesley JA, Cooke W, Delworth T, Dunne JP, Gerdes R, Harrison MJ, Held I, Hurlin WJ, Lee HC, Liang Z, Nong G, Pacanowski RC, Rosati A, Russell J, Samuels BL, Spelman M, Sweeney C, Stouffer RJ, Vecchi G, Winton M, Wittenberg A, Zeg F, Zhang R (2005) GFDL’s CM2 global coupled climate models. Part II: the baseline ocean simulation. J Climate (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, Van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds) (2001) Climate change 2001, the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Lambert SJ (1995) The effect of enhanced greenhouse warming on winter cyclone frequencies and strengths. J Climate 8:1447–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lambert SJ (2004) Changes in winter cyclone frequencies and strengths in transient enhanced greenhouse warming simulations using two coupled climate models. Atmos Ocean 42:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lambert SJ, Sheng J, Boyle JS (2002) Winter cyclone frequencies in thirteen models participating in the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP1). Climate Dynam 19:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marsland SJ, Haak H, Jungclaus JH, Latif M, Roske F (2003) The Max Planck Institute global ocean/sea-ice model with orthogonal curvilinear coordinates. Ocean Model 5:91–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Petterssen S (1956) Weather analysis and forecasting, vol 1. McGraw-Hill, New York, 422 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Roechner E, Bauml G, Bonaventura L, Brokopf R, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Hagemann S, Kirchner I, Kornblueh L, Manzini E, Rhodin A, Schlese U, Schulzweida U, Tompkins A (2003) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5. Part I: model description. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Rep. 349, 127 pp (Available from MPI for Meteorology, Bundesstr. 53, Hamburg, Germany)Google Scholar
  13. Russell GL, Miller JR, Rind D (1995) A coupled atmosphere-ocean model for transient climate change studies. Atmos Ocean 33:683–730Google Scholar
  14. Russell GL, Miller JR, Rind D, Ruedy RA, Schmidt GA, Sheth S (2000) Comparison of model and observed regional temperature changes during the past 40 years. J Geophys Res 105:14891–14898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmidt GA, Ruedy R, Hansen JE, Aleinov I, Bell N, Bauer M, Bauer S, Cairns B, Canuto V, Cheng Y, Del Gerio A, Faluvegi G, Friend AD, Hall TM, Hu Y, Kelley M, Kiang NY, Koch D, Lacis AA, Lerner J, Lo KK, Miller RL, Nazarenko L, Onas V, Perlwitz J, Perlwitz J, Rind D, Romanou A, Russell GL, Sato M, Shindell D, Stone PH, Sun S, Tausnev N, Thresher D, Yao M-S (2005) Present day atmospheric simulations using GISS Model E: comparison to in-situ satellite and reanalysis data. J Climate (in press)Google Scholar
  16. Sutcliffe RC, Forsdyke AG (1950) The theory and use of upper air thickness patterns in forecasting. Q J R Meteor Soc 76:189–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Washington WM, Weatherly JW, Meehl GA, Semtner AJ, Bettge TW, Craig AP, Strand WG, Arblaster J, Wayland VB, James R, Zhang Y (2000) Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations. Climate Dynam 16:755–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yukimoto SA, Noda A, Kitoh A, Sugi M, Kitamura Y, Hosaka M, Shibata K, Maeda S, Uchiyama T (2001) The new Meteorological Research Institute coupled GCM (MRI-CGCM2). Pap Meteor Geophys 51:47–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis Meteorological Service of CanadaUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations