Climate Dynamics

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 549–566 | Cite as

Future changes of El Niño in two global coupled climate models

  • Gerald A. Meehl
  • Haiyan Teng
  • Grant Branstator


Idealized forcing experiments with 1% per year CO2 increase to stabilized doubled and quadrupled CO2, twenty-first century transient scenario experiments (SRES scenarios A1B and B1), and stabilized twenty-second century A1B and B1 experiments with two global coupled climate models (PCM and CCSM3) are analyzed for possible future changes of El Niño events. With increased CO2 in the models, there is a reduction of amplitude of El Niño events. This is particularly apparent with larger forcing in the stabilized 4×CO2 experiment in PCM and the stabilized greenhouse gas A1B experiment in CCSM3, where the reduction of amplitude is outside the range of the inherent multi-century variability of El Niño in the control runs of the models and is statistically significant. With moderately increased forcing (stabilized 2×CO2 in PCM and the stabilized B1 experiment in CCSM3), the reduction in amplitude is evident, but it is not significant. The change in El Niño behavior with larger forcing is attributed to the change in base state temperature in the equatorial Pacific, which is similar with increased greenhouse gases (GHGs) in both models. Positive temperature anomalies in and below the thermocline, associated with a reduction of the trade winds, and weakened Pacific Ocean subtropical cells, produce a less intense thermocline, and consequently lower amplitude El Niño events. The previously noted intensification of El Niño tropical precipitation anomalies in a warmer mean base state that applied when there was no appreciable change in El Niño amplitude does not hold in the present study where the El Niño events decrease in magnitude in a future warmer climate. North American surface temperature anomalies associated with El Niño are reduced and become less significant in the future events, with the anomalously deepened Aleutian low in the North Pacific weakened and moved eastward with greater radiative forcing. Part of this is attributed to the smaller amplitude events and thus lower amplitude teleconnections as indicated by contrasting composites of medium and high amplitude El Niño events from the control runs. The change in midlatitude base state circulation also contributes to the change in El Niño teleconnections. The effects of this change in base state on the weakened El Niño teleconnections over North America are confirmed in sensitivity experiments with a version of the atmospheric model in which heating anomalies are specified to mimic El Niño events in a base state changed due to increased GHGs.


Precipitation Anomaly Global Couple Climate Model Parallel Climate Model Future Warm Climate Twentieth Century Simulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors acknowledge Robert Tomas and Aixue Hu for their valuable contributions to this analysis, and Mat Collins and Eric Guilyardi for constructive and useful reviews of the manuscript. This work was supported in part by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research, U.S. Department of Energy, as part of its Climate Change Prediction Program, and by the Weather and Climate Impact Assessment Initiative at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.


  1. Achutarao K, Sperber K (2006) ENSO simulation in coupled ocean-atmosphere models: are the current models better? Clim Dyn (in press)Google Scholar
  2. Ammann C, Meehl GA, Washington WM, Zender C (2003) A monthly and latitudinally varying volcanic forcing dataset in simulations of twentieth century climate. Geophys Res Lett 30 (12):1657, doi:10.1029/2003GL016875RRGoogle Scholar
  3. Arblaster JM, Meehl GA (2006) Contribution of various external forcings to trends in the Southern Annular Mode. J Clim (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Arblaster JM, Meehl GA, Moore A (2002) Interdecadal modulation of Australian rainfall. Clim Dyn 18:519–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Branstator G (1983) Horizontal energy propagation in a barotropic atmosphere with meridional and zonal structure. J Atmos Sci 40:1689–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Branstator G (2002) Circumglobal teleconnections, the jet stream waveguide, and the North Atlantic oscillation. J Clim 15:1893–1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Branstator G, Haupt S (1998) An empirical model of barotropic atmospheric dynamics and its response to tropical forcing. J Clim 11:2645–2667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Capotondi A et al (2006) Spatial and temporal structure of ENSO in 20th century coupled simulations. Ocean Model (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Chen X, Kimoto M, Takahashi M (2005) Changes in ENSO in response to greenhouse warming as simulated by the CCSR/NIES/FRCGC coupled GCM. SOLA 1:149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins M (2000a) Understanding uncertainties in the response of ENSO to greenhouse warming. Geophys Res Lett 27:3509–3513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins M (2000b) The El Niño Southern Oscillation in the second Hadley centre coupled model and its response to greenhouse warming. J Clim 13:1299–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins WD et al (2006) The community climate system model: CCSM3. J. Clim (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Cubasch U, Meehl GA, Boer GJ, Stouffer RJ, Dix M, Noda A, Senior CA, Raper S, Yap KS (2001) Projections of future climate change. In: Houghton JT., Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden P, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CI (eds) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the 3rd assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 525–582Google Scholar
  14. Dai A, Meehl GA, Washington WM,Wigley TML (2001) Ensemble simulations of 21st century climate changes: Business as usual vs. CO2 stabilization. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:2377–2388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dai A, Hu A, Meehl GA, Washington WM, Strand WG (2005) Atlantic thermohaline circulation in a coupled general circulation model: unforced variations vs. forced changes. J Clim 18:3270–3293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deser C, Capotondi A, Saravanan R, Phillips A (2006) Tropical Pacific and Atlantic climate variability in CCSM3. J Clim (in press)Google Scholar
  17. Dickinson RE, Oleson KW, Bonan GB, Hoffman F, Thornton P, Vertenstein M, Yang Z-L, Zeng X (2006) The community land model and its climate statistics as a component of the community climate system model. J Clim (in press)Google Scholar
  18. Guilyardi E et al (2004) Representing El Niño in coupled ocean-atmosphere GCMs: the dominant role of the atmospheric component. J Clim 17:4623–4629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guilyardi E (2005) El Niño-mean state-seasonal cycle interactions in a multi-model ensemble. Clim Dyn DOI 10.1007/s00382-005-0084-6Google Scholar
  20. Holland MM, Bitz CM, Hunke EC, Lipscomb WH, Schramm JL (2006) Influence of the sea ice thickness distribution on polar climate in CCSM3. J Clim (in press)Google Scholar
  21. Hoskins BJ, Simmons AJ, Andrews DC (1977) Energy dispersion in a barotropic atmosphere. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 103:553–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joseph R, Nigam S (2006) ENSO evolution and teleconnections in IPCC 20th century climate simulations: Realistic representation? J Clim (in press)Google Scholar
  23. Kaplan A, Kushnir Y, Cane MA, Blumenthal MB (1997) Reduced space optimal analysis for historical datasets: 136 years of Atlantic sea surface temperatures. J Geophys Res 102:27835–27860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kleeman R, McCreary JP, Klinger BA (1999) A mechanism for the decadal variation of ENSO. Geophys Res Lett 26:1743–1747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knutson TR, Manabe S (1998) Model assessment of decadal variability and trends in the tropical. Pacific Ocean J Clim 11:2273–2296Google Scholar
  26. Latif M et al (2001) ENSIP: the El Niño simulation intercomparison project. Clim Dyn 18:255–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. van Loon H, Meehl GA, Milliff R (2003) The Southern Oscillation in the early 1990s. Geophys Res Lett 30:1478, doi:10.1029/2002GL016307Google Scholar
  28. McPhaden MJ, Zhang D (2002) Slowdown of the meridional overturning circulation in the upper Pacific Ocean. Nature 415:603–608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Meehl GA (1987) The annual cycle and interannual variability in the tropical Pacific and Indian Ocean regions. Mon Weather Rev 115:27–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meehl GA, Arblaster JM (2003) Mechanisms of projected future changes in south Asian monsoon precipitation. Clim Dyn 21:659–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meehl GA, Branstator GW, Washington WM (1993) Tropical Pacific interannual variability and CO2 climate change. J Clim 6:42–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meehl GA, Gent P, Arblaster JM, Otto-Bliesner B, Brady E, Craig A (2001) Factors that affect amplitude of El Niño in global coupled climate models. Clim Dyn 17:515–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meehl GA, Washington WM, Wigley TML, Arblaster JM, Dai A (2003) Solar and greenhouse gas forcing and climate response in the 20th century. J Clim 16:426–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meehl GA, Washington WM, Ammann C, Arblaster JM, Wigley TML, Tebaldi C (2004a) Combinations of natural and anthropogenic forcings and 20th century climate. J Clim 17:3721–3727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meehl GA, Washington WM, Ammann C, Arblaster JM, Wigley TML, Tebaldi C (2004b) Combinations of natural and anthropogenic forcings and 20th century climate. J Clim 17:3721–3727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meehl GA, Washington WM, Collins WD, Arblaster JM, Hu A, Buja LE, Strand WG, Teng H (2005) How much more global warming and sea level rise? Science 307:1769–1772CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Meehl GA, Washington WM, Santer BD, Collins WD, Arblaster JM, Hu A, Lawrence D, Teng H, Buja LE, Strand WG (2006) Climate change in the 20th and 21st centuries and climate change commitment in the CCSM3. J Clim (in press)Google Scholar
  38. Merryfield W (2006) Changes to ENSO under CO2 doubling in the IPCC AR4 coupled climate models. J Clim (in press)Google Scholar
  39. Nonaka M, Xie S-P, McCreary JP (2001) Decadal variations in the subtropical cells and equatorial Pacific SST. Geophys Res Lett 29:1116, doi: 10.1029/2001GL013676Google Scholar
  40. van Oldenborgh G, Philip S, Collins M (2005) El Niño in a changing climate: A multi-model study. Ocean Sci Discuss 2:267–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ropelewski CE, Halpert MS (1987) Global and regional scale precipitation patterns associated with the El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Mon Weather Rev 115:1606–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Santer BD, Wehner MF, Wigley TML, Sausen R, Meehl GA, Taylor KE, Ammann C, Arblaster JM, Washington WM, Boyle JS, Bruggemann W (2003a) Contributions of anthropogenic and natural forcing to recent tropopause height changes. Science 301:479–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Santer BD, Wigley TML, Meehl GA, Wehner MF, Mears C, Schabel M, Wentz FJ, Ammann C, Arblaster JM, Bettge T, WashingtonWM, Taylor KE, Boyle JS, Bruggemann W, Doutriaux C (2003b) Influence of satellite data uncertainties on the detection of externally-forced climate change. Science 300:1280–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Selten FM, Branstator GW, Dijkstra HA, Kliphuis M (2004) Tropical origins for recent and future Northern Hemisphere climate change. Geophys Res Lett 31:L21205, doi:10.1029/2004GL020739Google Scholar
  45. Solomon A, McCreary Jr JP, Kleeman R, Klinger BA (2003) Interannual and decadal variability in an intermediate coupled model of the Pacific region. J Clim 16:383–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Timmermann A (1999) Detecting the nonstationary response of ENSO to greenhouse warming. J Atmos Sci 56:2313–2325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Timmermann A, Oberhuber J, Bacher A, Esch M, Latif M, Roeckner E (1999) Increased El Niño frequency in a climate model forced by future greenhouse warming. Nature 398:694–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wallace JM, Gutzler DS (1981) Teleconnections in the geopotential height field during the Northern Hemisphere winter. Mon Weather Rev 109:784–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Washington WM, Weatherly JW, Meehl GA, Semtner Jr AJ, Bettge TW, Craig AP, Strand Jr. WG, Arblaster JM, Wayland VB, James R, Zhang Y (2000) Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations. Clim. Dyn 16:755–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yasunari T (1991) ``The monsoon year”–a new concept of the climatic year in the tropics. Bull Am Meteorol. Soc 72:1331–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald A. Meehl
    • 1
  • Haiyan Teng
    • 1
  • Grant Branstator
    • 1
  1. 1.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulder COUSA

Personalised recommendations