Climate Dynamics

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 473–487 | Cite as

Sensitivity of last glacial maximum climate to sea ice conditions in the Nordic Seas

  • Øyvind Byrkjedal
  • Nils Gunnar Kvamstø
  • Marius Meland
  • Eystein Jansen


Published reconstructions of last glacial maximum (LGM) sea surface temperatures and sea ice extent differ significantly. We here test the sensitivity of simulated North Atlantic climates to two different reconstructions by using these reconstructions as boundary conditions for model experiments. An atmospheric general circulation model has been used to perform two simulations of the (LGM) and a modern-day control simulation. Standard (CLIMAP) reconstructions of sea ice and sea surface temperatures have been used for the first simulation, and a set of new reconstructions in the Nordic Seas/Northern Atlantic have been used for the second experiment. The new reconstruction is based on 158 core samples, and represents ice-free conditions during summer in the Nordic Seas, with accordingly warmer sea surface temperatures and less extensive sea ice during winter as well. The simulated glacial climate is globally 5.7 K colder than modern day, with the largest changes at mid and high latitudes. Due to more intense Hadley circulation, the precipitation at lower latitudes has increased in the simulations of the LGM. Relative to the simulation with the standard CLIMAP reconstructions, reduction of the sea ice in the North Atlantic gives positive local responses in temperature, precipitation and reduction of the sea level pressure. Only very weak signatures of the wintertime Icelandic Low occur when the standard CLIMAP sea surface temperature reconstruction is used as the lower boundary condition in LGM. With reduced sea ice conditions in the Nordic Seas, the Icelandic Low becomes more intense and closer to its present structure. This indicates that thermal forcing is an important factor in determining the strength and position of the Icelandic Low. The Arctic Oscillation is the most dominant large scale variability feature on the Northern Hemisphere in modern day winter climate. In the simulation of the LGM with extensive sea ice this pattern is significantly changed and represents no systematic large scale variability over the North Atlantic. Reduction of the North Atlantic sea ice extent leads to stronger variability in monthly mean sea level pressure in winter. The synoptic variability appears at a lower level in the simulation when standard reconstructions of the sea surface in the LGM are used. A closer inspection of storm tracks in this model experiment shows that that the synoptic lows follow a narrow band along the ice edge during winter. The trajectories of synoptic lows are not constrained to the sea ice edge to the same degree when the sea ice extent is reduced. Seasonally open waters in the Nordic Seas in the new reconstruction apparently act as a moisture source, consistent with the current understanding of the rapid growth of the Fennoscandian and Barents Ice Sheets, during the LGM. The signal from the intensified thermal forcing in the North Atlantic in Boreal winter is carried zonally by upper tropospheric waves, and thus generates non-local responses to the changed sea ice cover.



This work has been supported by Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Bergen and by MACESIZ, Marine Climate and Ecosystems in the Seasonal Ice Zone, founded by the Research Council of Norway. This is publication number A 112 from the Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research.


  1. Bentsen M, Drange H, Furevik T, Zhou T (2004) Simulated variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. Clim Dyn 22:701–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonfils CJ, Lewden D, Taylor KE (1998) Documentation of the PMIP models. PCMDI Report,
  3. Boulton GS (1979) Glacial history of the spitsbergen archipelago and the problem of a barents shelf ice sheet. Boreas 8:31–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CLIMAP (1981) Seasonal reconstruction of the Earth’s surface at the last glacial maximum. Series, Map and Chart vol. 36. Geologocal Society of America, 18 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Dai A, Fung IY, DelGenio AD (1997) Surface observed global land precipitation variations during 1900–88. J Clim 10:2943–2962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Denton GH, Hughes TJ (eds) (1981) The last great ice sheets. Wiley, New York, pp 484Google Scholar
  7. Deque M, Dreveton C, Braun A, Cariolle D (1994) The arpege/Ifs atmosphere model – a contribution to the french community climate modeling. Clim Dyn 10:249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deque M, Marquet P, Jones RG (1998) Simulation of climate change over Europe using a global variable resolution general circulation model. Clim Dyn 14:173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deque M, Piedelievre JP (1995) High-Resolution climate simulation over Europe. Clim Dyn 11:321–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dong B, Valdes PJ (1998) Simulations of the last glacial maximum climates using a general circulation model: prescribed versus computed sea surface temperatures. Clim Dyn 14:571–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elverhoi A, Svendsen JI, Solheim A, Andersen ES, Milliman J, Mangerud J, Hooke RL (1995) Late quaternary sediment yield from the high arctic svalbard area. J Geol 103:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall NMJ, Valdes PJ, Dong BW (1996) The maintenance of the last great ice sheets: a UGAMP GCM study. J Clim 9:1004–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hebbeln D, Dokken T, Andersen ES, Hald M, Elverhoi A (1994) Moisture supply for northern ice-sheet growth during the last glacial maximum. Nature 370:357–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hodges KI (1994) A general-method for tracking analysis and its application to meteorological data. Mon Weather Rev 122:2573–2586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hodges KI (1995) Feature tracking on the unit-sphere. Mon Weather Rev 123:3458–3465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hodges KI (1996) Spherical nonparametric estimators applied to the UGAMP model integration for AMIP. Mon Weather Rev 124:2914–2932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodges KI (1999) Adaptive constraints for feature tracking. Mon Weather Rev 127:1362–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoskins BJ, Karoly DJ (1981) The steady linear response of a spherical atmosphere to thermal and orographic forcing. J Atmos Sci 38:1179–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hurrell JW (1995) Decadal trends in the north-atlantic Oscillation – regional temperatures and precipitation. Science 269:676–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hurrell JW, VanLoon H (1997) Decadal variations in climate associated with the north Atlantic oscillation. Clim Change 36:301–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Joussaume S, Taylor KE (1995) Status of the paleoclimate modeling intercomparison project (PMIP). In: Proceedings of the first international AMIP scientific conference. WCRP Report, pp 425–430Google Scholar
  22. Joussaume S, Taylor KE (2001) The paleoclimate modelling intercomparison project. In: Proceedings of the third PMIP Workshop, WCRP report WCRP-111, pp 43–49Google Scholar
  23. Kushnir Y, Robinson WA, Blade I, Hall NMJ, Peng S, Sutton R (2002) Atmospheric GCM response to extratropical SST anomalies: synthesis and evaluation. J Clim 15:2233–2256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kutzbach JE (1988) Climatic changes of the last 18,000 years - observations and model simulations. Science 241:1043–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lautenschlager M, Herterich K (1990) Atmospheric response to ice-age conditions – climatology near the earths surface. J Geophys Res-Atmos 95:22547–22557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mangerud J, Astakhov V, Svendsen JI (2002) The extent of the Barents-Kara ice sheet during the last glacial maximum. Quaternary Sci Rev 21:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meland MY, Jansen E, Elderfield H (2005) Constraints on SST estimates for the northern North Atlantic/Nordic seas during the LGM. Quaternary Sci Rev 24(7–9):835–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. North GR, Bell TL, Cahalan RF, Moenig FJ (1982) Sampling errors in the stimation of empirical orthogonal functions. Mon Weather Rev 110:699–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peltier WR (1994) Ice-age paleotopography. Science 265:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pflaumann U, Duprat J, Pujol C, Labeyrie LD (1996) SIMMAX: a modern analog technique to deduce Atlantic sea surface temperatures from planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Paleoceanography 11:15–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pflaumann U, Sarnthein M, Chapman M, d’Abreu L, Funnell B, Huels M, Kiefer T, Maslin M, Schulz H, Swallow J, van Kreveld S, Vautravers M, Vogelsang E, Weinelt M (2003) Glacial North Atlantic: sea-surface conditions reconstructed by GLAMAP 2000. Paleoceanography 18(3):1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pinot S, Ramstein G, Marsiat I, de Vernal A, Peyron O, Duplessy JC, Weinelt M (1999) Sensitivity of the European LGM climate to North Atlantic sea-surface temperature. Geophys Res Lett 26:1893–1896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reynolds RW, Smith TM (1995) A high-resolution global sea-surface temperature climatology. J Clim 8:1571–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rogers JC (1997) North Atlantic storm track variability and its association to the north Atlantic oscillation and climate variability of northern Europe. J Clim 10:1635–1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosell-Mele A, Comes P (1999) Evidence for a warm last glacial maximum in the Nordic seas or an example of shortcomings in U-37(K)’ and U-37(K) to estimate low sea surface temperature? Paleoceanography 14:770–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sarnthein M, Jansen E, Weinelt M, Arnold M, Duplessy JC, Erlenkeuser H, Flatoy A, Johannessen G, Johannessen T, Jung S, Koc N, Labeyrie L, Maslin M, Pflaumann U, Schulz H (1995) Variations in atlantic surface ocean paleoceanography, 50-Degrees-80-Degrees-N - A time-slice record of the last 30,000 years. Paleoceanography 10:1063–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shin SI, Liu Z, Otto-Bliesner B, Brady EC, Kutzbach JE, Harrison SP (2003) A simulation of the last glacial maximum climate using the NCAR-CCSM. Clim Dyn 20:127–151Google Scholar
  38. Thompson DWJ, Wallace JM (1998) The Arctic oscillation signature in the wintertime geopotential height and temperature fields. Geophys Res Lett 25:1297–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trenberth KE, Hurrell JW (1994) Decadal atmosphere-ocean variations in the Pacific. Clim Dyn 9:303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. de Vernal A, Hillaire-Marcel C, Turon JL, Matthiessen J (2000) Reconstruction of sea-surface temperature, salinity, and sea-ice cover in the northern North Atlantic during the last glacial maximum based on dinocyst assemblages. Can J Earth Sci 37:725–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Veum T, Jansen E, Arnold M, Beyer I, Duplessy JC (1992) Water mass exchange between the North-Atlantic and the norwegian sea during the past 28,000 years. Nature 356:783–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wagner T, Henrich R (1994) Organo- and lithofacies of TOC-lead glacial/interglacial deposits in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea: sedimentary and diagenetic responses to paleoceanographic and paleoclimatic changes. Mar Geol 120:335–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wallace JM, Gutzler DS (1981) Teleconnections in the geopotential height field during the northern hemisphere winter. Mon Weather Rev 109:784–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weinelt M, Sarnthein M, Pflaumann U, Schulz H, Jung SJA, Erlenkeuser H (1996) Ice-free Nordic seas during the last glacial maximum? Potential sites of deepwater formation. Paleoclimates 1:283–309Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Øyvind Byrkjedal
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nils Gunnar Kvamstø
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marius Meland
    • 1
    • 3
  • Eystein Jansen
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Bjerknes Centre for Climate ResearchUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  2. 2.Geophysical InstituteUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  3. 3.Department of Earth ScienceUniversity of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations