Advertisement

Climate Dynamics

, Volume 24, Issue 2–3, pp 297–307 | Cite as

A world without Greenland: impacts on the Northern Hemisphere winter circulation in low- and high-resolution models

  • M. M. JungeEmail author
  • R. Blender
  • K. Fraedrich
  • V. Gayler
  • U. Luksch
  • F. Lunkeit
Article

Abstract

To investigate the effect of Greenland’s orography on the northern hemisphere winter circulation experiments with an atmospheric GCM are conducted: a perturbed integration where standard orography is reduced to sea level in the Greenland area is compared to a standard orography control integration. The outcome of these experiments suggests that the existence of high mountains at Greenland causes a reinforcement of the stationary wave field in the Atlantic sector, colder temperatures to the west of Greenland and warmer temperatures to the east and south, over the North Atlantic. The impact on the flow field cannot be understood in the framework of standing Rossby waves, but it indicates a resonance between remotely forced stationary waves and local (thermo-) dynamics. The pattern of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), in particular the northern centre, lies further to the east in the flat-Greenland experiment compared to the control run and the observations. Together with the fact that the climatological low-pressure system around Iceland hardly shifts, this suggests that the location of the NAO is not necessarily tied to the time mean pressure distributions. Considering the model resolution as a parameter, experiments with a high resolution (T106) suggest that the near-field changes are represented sufficiently by a T42 resolution, a standard resolution used in state-of-the-art coupled climate models. In contrast, far-field changes depend critically on model resolution. Hemispheric circulation and temperature changes differ substantially from low to high resolution, and generalized statements about the impact of Greenland’s orography cannot be made.

Keywords

Geopotential Height North Atlantic Oscillation North Atlantic Oscillation Index Teleconnection Pattern Geopotential Height Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are greatly indebted to the Model and Data group, Hamburg, for providing the reanalysis data (ECMWF/DWD/DKRZ: 1996). We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions and comments on the manuscript. They helped to improve the presentation of our results. We thank Rita Seiffert for providing the cyclone-track statistics. This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within the Sonderforschungsbereich 512: Tiefdruckgebiete und Klimasystem des Nordatlantiks.

References

  1. Ambaum MHP, Hoskins BJ, Stephenson DB (2001) Arctic Oscillation or North Atlantic Oscillation. J Climate 14:3495–3507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacher A, Oberhuber JM, Roeckner E (1998) ENSO dynamics and seasonal cycle in the tropical Pacific as simulated by the ECHAM4 / OPYC3 coupled general circulation model. Clim Dyn 14:431–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blender R, Fraedrich K, Lunkeit F (1997) Identification of cyclone track regimes in the North Atlantic. Quart J R Met Soc 123:727–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charney J, Eliassen A (1949) A numerical model for prediciting the perturbations of the middle latitude westerlies Tellus 1:38–54Google Scholar
  5. Christoph M, Ulbrich U, Oberhuber JM, Roeckner E (2000) The Role of Ocean Dynamics for Low-Frequency Fluctuations of the NAO in a Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere GCM. J Climate 13:2536–2549Google Scholar
  6. Crowley TJ, Baum SK (1995) Is the Greenland Ice Sheet bistable?. Paleoceanography 10:357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dong B, Valdes PJ (2000) Climates at the Last Glacial Maximum: Influence of Model Horizontal Resolution. J Climate 13:1554–1573Google Scholar
  8. Gregory JM, Huybrechts P, Raper SCB (2004) Threatened loss of the Greenland ice-sheet. Nature 428:616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Held IM (1983) Stationary and quasi-stationary eddies in the extratropical troposphere. In: Hoskins BJ, Pearce DP (eds) Large-Scale dynamical processes in the atmosphere. Academic Press, London pp 127–168Google Scholar
  10. Hoskins B, Karoly DJ (1981) The steady linear response of a spherical atmosphere to thermal and orographic forcing. J Atmos Sci 38:1179–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kristjánsson JE, McInnes H (1999) The impact of Greenland on cyclone evolution in the North Atlantic. Quart J R Met Soc 125:2819–2834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lau N (1988) Variability of the observed midlatitude storm tracks in relation to low-frequency changes in the circulation pattern. J Atmos Sci 45:2718–2743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marshall J, Kushnir Y, Battisti D, Chang P, Czaja A, Dickson R, Hurrell J, McCartney M, Saravanan R, Visbeck M (2001) North Atlantic climate variability: phenomena, impacts and mechanisms. Int J Climat 21:1863–1898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. May W (2001) Impact of horizontal resolution on the simulation of seasonal climate in the Atlantic/European area for present and future times. Climate Research 16:203–223Google Scholar
  15. Merkel U, Latif M (2002) A High Resolution AGCM Study of the El Niño Impact on the North Atlantic/European Sector. Geophys Res Lett 29:10.1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Petersen GN, Kristjánsson JE, Ólafsson H (2004) Greenland and the northern hemisphere winter circulation. Tellus A 56:102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Plumb RA (1985) On the three-dimensional propagation of stationary waves. J Atmos Sci 42:217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ringler TD, Cook KH (1995) Orographically induced stationary waves: dependence on latitude. J Atmos Sci 52:2548–2560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roeckner E, Arpe K, Bengtsson L, Christoph M, Claussen M, Dümenil L, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Schlese U, Schulzweida U (1996) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-4 Tech rep. Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  20. Rogers JC (1990) Patterns of low-frequency monthly sea level pressure variability (1899-1986) and associated wave cyclone frequencies. J Climate 3:1364–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rogers JC (1997) North Atlantic storm track variability and its association to the North Atlantic Oscillation and climate variability of northern Europe. J Climate 10:1635–1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schwierz CB (2001) Interactions of Greenland-scale orography and extra-tropical synoptic-scale flow Tech rep. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  23. Seager R, Battisti DS, Yin J, Gordon N, Naik N, Clement AC, Cane MA (2002) Is the Gulf Stream responsible for Europe’s mild winters?. Quart J R Met Soc 128:2569–2586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sickmöller M, Blender R, Fraedrich K (2000) Observed winter cyclone tracks in the northern hemisphere in re-analysed ECMWF data. Quart J R Met Soc 126:591–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thompson DWJ, Wallace JM (2000) Annular modes in the extratropical circulation Part I: month-to-month variability. J Climate 13:1000–1016Google Scholar
  26. Toniazzo T, Gregory JM, Huybrechts P (2004) Climatic Impact of a Greenland Deglaciation and Its Possible Irreversibility. J Climate 17:21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ulbrich U, Christoph M (1999) A shift of the NAO and increasing storm track activity over Europe due to anthropogenic greenhouse gas forcing. Clim Dyn 15:551–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wallace M, Gutzler G (1981) Teleconnections in the geopotential height field during the northern hemisphere winter. Mon Weath Rev 109:784–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. M. Junge
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. Blender
    • 1
  • K. Fraedrich
    • 1
  • V. Gayler
    • 2
  • U. Luksch
    • 1
  • F. Lunkeit
    • 1
  1. 1.Meteorologisches InstitutUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Modelle und Daten am Max-Planck-Institut für MeteorologieHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations