Climate Dynamics

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 495–511

Changes in frost days in simulations of twentyfirst century climate



Global coupled climate model simulations of twentieth and twentyfirst century climate are analyzed for changes in frost days (defined as nighttime minima less than freezing). The model simulations agree with the observed pattern for late twentieth century of a greater decrease of frost days in the west and southwest USA compared to the rest of the country, and almost no change in frost days in fall compared to relatively larger decreases in spring. Associated with general increases of nighttime minimum temperatures, in the future climate with increased greenhouse gases (GHGs) the number of frost days is fewer almost everywhere, but there are greatest decreases over the western parts of the continents. The numbers of frost days are most consistently related to sea level pressure, with more frost days occurring when high pressure dominates on the monthly time scale in association with clearer skies and lower nighttime minimum temperatures. Spatial patterns of relative changes of frost days are indicative of regional scale atmospheric circulation changes that affect nighttime minimum temperatures. Increases of soil moisture and clouds also contribute, but play secondary roles. The linkages among soil moisture, clouds, sea level pressure, and diurnal temperature range are quantified by a statistical multiple regression model. Coefficients for present and future climate are similar among the predictors, indicating physical processes that affect frost days in present and future climates do not appreciably change. Only the intercept changes in association with the significant warming of the mean climate state. This study highlights the fact that, though there is a general decrease in the number of frost days with global warming, the processes that affect the pattern of those changes, and thus the regional changes of frost days, are influenced by several interrelated physical processes, with changes in regional atmospheric circulation generally being most important.


  1. Ammann C, Meehl GA, Washington WM, Zender C (2003) A monthly and latitudinally varying volcanic forcing data set in simulations of twentieth century climate. Geophys Res Lett 30: 10.1029/2003GLO16875RRGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonsal BR, Zhang X, Vincent LA, Hogg WD (2001) Characteristics of daily and extreme temperatures over Canada. J Clim 14: 1959–1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cubasch U, Meehl Ga, Boer GJ, Stouffer RJ, Dix M, Noda A, Senoir CA, Raper S, Yap KS (2001) Projections of future climate change. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer P, van der Linden P, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CI (eds) Climate change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp 525–582Google Scholar
  4. Dai A, Trenberth KE, Karl TR (1999) Effects of clouds, soil moisture, precipitation, and water vapor on diurnal temperature range. J Clim 12: 2451–2473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dai A, Wigley TML, Boville BA, Kiehl JT, Buja LE (2001) Climates of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries simulated by the NCAR Climate System Model. J Clim 14: 485–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delworth TL, Mahlman JD, Knutson TR (1999) Changes in heat index associated with CO2-induced global warming. Clim Change 43: 369–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Easterling DR, Meehl GA, Parmesan C, Changnon S, Karl TR, Mearns LO (2000) Climate extremes: observations, modeling and impacts. Sci 289: 2068–2074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Easterling DR (2002) Recent changes in frost days and the frost-free season in the United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83: 1327–1332Google Scholar
  9. Frich P, Alexander LV, Della-Marta P, Gleason B, Haylock M, Klein Tank AMG, Peterson T (2002) Observed coherent changes in climate extremes during the second half of the twentieth century. Clim Res 19: 193–212Google Scholar
  10. Fyfe JC, Boer GJ, Flato GM (1999) The Arctic and Antarctic Oscillations and their projected changes under global warming. Geophys Res Lett 26: 1601–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gillett NP, Allen MR, McDonald RE, Senior CA, Shindell DT, Schmidt GA (2002) How linear is the Arctic Oscillation response to greenhouse gases? J Geophys Res 107: 10.1029/2001JD000589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heino R and coauthors (1999) Progress in the study of climate extremes in northern and central Europe. Clim Change 42: 151–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1998) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Meehl GA, Zwiers F, Evans J, Knutson T, Mearns L, Whetton P (2000) Trends in extreme weather and climate events: issues related to modeling extremes in rojections of future climate change. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81: 427–436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meehl GA, Gent P, Arblaster JM, Otto-Bliesner B, Brady E, Craig A (2001) Factors that affect amplitude of El Nino in global coupled climate models. Clim Dyn 17: 515–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meehl GA, Washington WM, Wigley TML, Arblaster JM Dai A (2003) Solar and greenhouse forcing and climate response in the 2othe century. J Clim 16: 426–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meehl GA, Washington WM, Arblaster JM, Hu A (2004a) Factors affecting climate sensitivity in global coupled models. J Clim 17: 1584–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meehl, GA, Washington WM, Ammann C, Arblaster JM, Wigley TML, Tebaldi C (2004b) Combinations of natural and anthropogenic forcings and 20th century Climate. J Clim in pressGoogle Scholar
  19. Parmesan C, Root TL, Willig MR (2000) Impacts of extreme weather and climate on terrestrial biota. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81: 443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stone DA, Weaver AJ (2002) Daily maximum and minimum temperature trends in a climate model. Geophys Res Lett 29: 10.1029/2001GL14556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Washington WM, Weatherly JW, Meehl GA, Semtner Jr. AJ, Bettge TW, Craig AP, Strand Jr. WG, Arblaster JM, Wayland VB, James R, Zhang Y (2000) Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations. Clim Dyn 16: 755–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag  2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations