Climate Dynamics

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 117–132

Effects of land use change on North American climate: impact of surface datasets and model biogeophysics

  • K. W. Oleson
  • G. B. Bonan
  • S. Levis
  • M. Vertenstein
Article

Abstract

This study examines the impact of historical land-cover change on North American surface climate, focusing on the robustness of the climate signal with respect to representation of sub-grid heterogeneity and land biogeophysics within a climate model. We performed four paired climate simulations with the Community Atmosphere Model using two contrasting land models and two different representations of land-cover change. One representation used a biome classification without subgrid-scale heterogeneity while the other used high-resolution satellite data to prescribe multiple vegetation types within a grid cell. Present-day and natural vegetation datasets were created for both representations. All four sets of climate simulations showed that present-day vegetation has cooled the summer climate in regions of North America compared to natural vegetation. The simulated magnitude and spatial extent of summer cooling due to land-cover change was reduced when the biome-derived land-cover change datasets were replaced by the satellite-derived datasets. The diminished cooling is partly due to reduced intensity of agriculture in the satellite-derived datasets. Comparison of the two land-surface models showed that the use of a comparatively warmer and drier land model in conjunction with satellite-derived datasets further reduced the simulated magnitude of summer cooling. These results suggest that the cooling signal associated with North American land-cover change is robust but the magnitude and therefore detection of the signal depends on the realism of the datasets used to represent land-cover change and the parametrisation of land biogeophysics.

References

  1. Betts RA (2001) Biogeophysical impacts of land use on present-day climate: near-surface temperature change and radiative forcing. Atmos Sci Lett 1, DOI:10.1006/asle.2001.0023Google Scholar
  2. Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci Bull 24: 43–69Google Scholar
  3. Bonan GB (1996) A Land Surface model (LSM version 1.0) for ecological, hydrological, and atmospheric studies: technical description and user’s guide. NCAR Tech Note NCAR/TN-417+STR, pp 150Google Scholar
  4. Bonan GB (1997) Effects of land use on the climate of the United States. Clim Change 37: 449–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonan GB (1998) The land surface climatology of the NCAR Land Surface Model coupled to the NCAR community climate model. J Clim 11: 1307–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonan GB (1999) Frost followed the plow: Impacts of deforestation on the climate of the United States. Ecol Appl 9: 1305–1315Google Scholar
  7. Bonan GB (2001) Observational evidence for reduction of daily maximum temperature by croplands in the Midwest United States. J Clim 14: 2430–2442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonan GB, Oleson KW, Vertenstein M, Levis S, Zeng X, Dai Y, Dickinson RE, Yang Z-L (2002a) The land surface climatology of the Community Land Model coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model. J Clim 15: 3123–3149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonan GB, Levis S, Kergoat L, Oleson KW (2002b) Landscapes as patches of plant functional types: an integrating concept for climate and ecosystem models. Global Biogeochem Cycles 16: DOI 10.1029/2000GB001360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bounoua L, DeFries R, Collatz GJ, Sellers P, Khan H (2002) Effects of land cover conversion on surface climate. Clim Change 52: 29–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brovkin V, Ganopolski A, Claussen M, Kubatzki C, Petoukhov V (1999) Modelling climate response to historical land cover change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 8: 509–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins WD and co-authors (2003) Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM2). Available at http://www.ccsm.ucar.edu/models/atm-cam/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  13. Dorman JL, Sellers PJ (1989) A global climatology of albedo, roughness length and stomatal resistance for atmospheric general circulation models as represented by the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB). J Appl Meteorol 28: 834–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldewijk KK (2001) Estimating global land use change over the past 300 years: The HYDE database. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 15: 417–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Govindasamy B, Duffy PB, Caldeira K (2001) Land use changes and Northern Hemisphere cooling. Geophys Res Lett 28: 291–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen JE, Sato M, Lacis A, Ruedy R, Tegen I, Mathews E (1998) Climate forcings in the Industrial era. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95: 12,753–12,758Google Scholar
  17. Matthews HD, Weaver AJ, Eby M, Meissner KJ (2003) Radiative forcing of climate by historical land cover change. Geophys Res Lett 30: DOI 10.1029/2002GL016098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ramankutty N, Foley JA (1999) Estimating historical changes in global land cover: croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochem Cycles 13: 997–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ramankutty N, Goldewijk KK, Leemans R, Foley J, Oldfield F (2001) Land cover change over the last three centuries due to human activities. Global Change Newsl 47: 17–19Google Scholar
  20. Zhou L, Dickinson RE, Tian Y, Zeng X, Dai Y, Yang Z-L, Schaaf CB, Gao F, Jin Y, Strahler A, Myneni RB, Yu H,, Wu W, Shaikh M (2003) Comparison of seasonal and spatial variations of albedos from Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Common Land Model. J Geophys Res 108: DOI 10.1029/2002JD003326Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag  2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. W. Oleson
    • 1
  • G. B. Bonan
    • 1
  • S. Levis
    • 1
  • M. Vertenstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Climate and Global Dynamics DivisionNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations